H12-725_V4.0 Exam Dumps : HCIP-Security V4.0 Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Aggressive modeis a faster IKE Phase 1 negotiation method butdoes not support NAT traversal (NAT-T) with AH.

NAT-T only works with ESP, because:

AH includes the original IP header in its integrity check, which breaks when NAT modifies the IP address.

ESP works with NAT-Tsince it does not include the original IP header in its integrity check.

Why is this statement false?

AH does not support NAT-T, soAH+ESP cannot be used in NAT traversal scenarios.

HCIP-Security References:

Huawei HCIP-Security Guide → IPsec VPN NAT Traversal

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Nginx logs store detailed HTTP request information, including:

RequestedURLs

ClientIP addresses

Query parameters(which may contain SQL injection attempts)

SQL injection detection using logs:

SuspiciousSQL keywordsin GET/POST requests (e.g., ' OR 1=1 -- or UNION SELECT).

Repeated attack attemptsfrom a single source IP.

Why is this statement true?

Nginx logs provide full request details, enabling engineers to detect SQL injection attempts.

HCIP-Security References:

Huawei HCIP-Security Guide → Web Attack Detection & Log Analysis

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Inbound bandwidth= Trafficenteringthe firewall.

Outbound bandwidth= Trafficleavingthe firewall.

Correct answer:

A. Private → Public traffic is controlled by outbound bandwidth.

Why are the other options incorrect?

Bis incorrect because public → private traffic is controlled byinbound bandwidth, not outbound.

Cis incorrect because inbound bandwidth does not apply to private → public traffic.

Dis incorrect because public → private traffic is controlled by inbound bandwidth.

HCIP-Security References:

Huawei HCIP-Security Guide → Firewall Virtual System Bandwidth Control