Databricks-Certified-Associate-Developer-for-Apache-Spark-3.0 Exam Dumps : Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.0 Exam

Explanation

transactionsDf.repartition(transactionsDf.rdd.getNumPartitions()+2)

Correct. The repartition operator is the correct one for increasing the number of partitions. calling getNumPartitions() on DataFrame.rdd returns the current number of partitions.

transactionsDf.coalesce(10)

No, after this command transactionsDf will continue to only have 8 partitions. This is because coalesce() can only decreast the amount of partitions, but not increase it.

transactionsDf.repartition(transactionsDf.getNumPartitions()+2)

Incorrect, there is no getNumPartitions() method for the DataFrame class.

transactionsDf.coalesce(transactionsDf.getNumPartitions()+2)

Wrong, coalesce() can only be used for reducing the number of partitions and there is no getNumPartitions() method for the DataFrame class.

transactionsDf.repartition(transactionsDf._partitions+2)

No, DataFrame has no _partitions attribute. You can find out the current number of partitions of a DataFrame with the DataFrame.rdd.getNumPartitions() method.

More info: pyspark.sql.DataFrame.repartition — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation, pyspark.RDD.getNumPartitions — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 3, QUESTION NO: 23 (Databricks import instructions)

Explanation

Correct code block:

def count_to_target(target):

if target is None:

return

result = list(range(target))

return result

count_to_target_udf = udf(count_to_target, ArrayType(IntegerType()))

transactionsDf.select(count_to_target_udf('predError'))

Output of correct code block:

+--------------------------+

|count_to_target(predError)|

+--------------------------+

| [0, 1, 2]|

| [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]|

| [0, 1, 2]|

| null|

| null|

| [0, 1, 2]|

+--------------------------+

This QUESTION NO: is not exactly easy. You need to be familiar with the syntax around UDFs (user-defined functions). Specifically, in this QUESTION NO: it is important to pass the correct types

to the udf

method - returning an array of a specific type rather than just a single type means you need to think harder about type implications than usual.

Remember that in Spark, you always pass types in an instantiated way like ArrayType(IntegerType()), not like ArrayType(IntegerType). The parentheses () are the key here - make sure you do not

forget those.

You should also pay attention that you actually pass the UDF count_to_target_udf, and not the Python method count_to_target to the select() operator.

Finally, null values are always a tricky case with UDFs. So, take care that the code can handle them correctly.

More info: How to Turn Python Functions into PySpark Functions (UDF) – Chang Hsin Lee – Committing my thoughts to words.

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 3, QUESTION NO: 24 (Databricks import instructions)

Explanation

Correct code block:

spark.createDataFrame([("red",), ("blue",), ("green",)], ["color"])

The createDataFrame syntax is not exactly straightforward, but luckily the documentation (linked below) provides several examples on how to use it. It also shows an example very similar to the

code block presented here which should help you answer this QUESTION NO: correctly.

More info: pyspark.sql.SparkSession.createDataFrame — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 2, QUESTION NO: 23 (Databricks import instructions)