Databricks-Certified-Associate-Developer-for-Apache-Spark-3.0 Exam Dumps : Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.0 Exam

Explanation

Correct code block:

transactionsDf.join(broadcast(itemsDf), "transactionId", "left_semi")

This QUESTION NO: is extremely difficult and exceeds the difficulty of questions in the exam by far.

A first indication of what is asked from you here is the remark that "the query should be executed in an optimized way". You also have qualitative information about the size of itemsDf and

transactionsDf. Given that itemsDf is "very small" and that the execution should be optimized, you should consider instructing Spark to perform a broadcast join, broadcasting the "very small"

DataFrame itemsDf to all executors. You can explicitly suggest this to Spark via wrapping itemsDf into a broadcast() operator. One answer option does not include this operator, so you can disregard

it. Another answer option wraps the broadcast() operator around transactionsDf - the bigger of the two DataFrames. This answer option does not make sense in the optimization context and can

likewise be disregarded.

When thinking about the broadcast() operator, you may also remember that it is a method of pyspark.sql.functions. One answer option, however, resolves to itemsDf.broadcast([...]). The DataFrame

class has no broadcast() method, so this answer option can be eliminated as well.

All two remaining answer options resolve to transactionsDf.join([...]) in the first 2 gaps, so you will have to figure out the details of the join now. You can pick between an outer and a left semi join. An

outer join would include columns from both DataFrames, where a left semi join only includes columns from the "left" table, here transactionsDf, just as asked for by the question. So, the correct

answer is the one that uses the left_semi join.

Explanation

Correct code block:

transactionsDf.select("storeId").printSchema()

The difficulty of this QUESTION NO: is that it is hard to solve with the stepwise first-to-last-gap approach that has worked well for similar questions, since the answer options are so different from

one

another. Instead, you might want to eliminate answers by looking for patterns of frequently wrong answers.

A first pattern that you may recognize by now is that column names are not expressed in quotes. For this reason, the answer that includes storeId should be eliminated.

By now, you may have understood that the DataFrame.limit() is useful for returning a specified amount of rows. It has nothing to do with specific columns. For this reason, the answer that resolves to

limit("storeId") can be eliminated.

Given that we are interested in information about the data type, you should QUESTION NO: whether the answer that resolves to limit(1).columns provides you with this information. While

DataFrame.columns is a valid call, it will only report back column names, but not column types. So, you can eliminate this option.

The two remaining options either use the printSchema() or print_schema() command. You may remember that DataFrame.printSchema() is the only valid command of the two. The select("storeId")

part just returns the storeId column of transactionsDf - this works here, since we are only interested in that column's type anyways.

More info: pyspark.sql.DataFrame.printSchema — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 3, QUESTION NO: 57 (Databricks import instructions)

Explanation

itemsDf.sample(fraction=0.1, seed=87238)

Correct. If itemsDf has 10,000 rows, this code block returns about 1,000, since DataFrame.sample() is never guaranteed to return an exact amount of rows. To ensure you are not returning

duplicates, you should leave the withReplacement parameter at False, which is the default. Since the QUESTION NO: specifies that the same rows should be returned even if the code block is run

twice,

you need to specify a seed. The number passed in the seed does not matter as long as it is an integer.

itemsDf.sample(withReplacement=True, fraction=0.1, seed=23536)

Incorrect. While this code block fulfills almost all requirements, it may return duplicates. This is because withReplacement is set to True.

Here is how to understand what replacement means: Imagine you have a bucket of 10,000 numbered balls and you need to take 1,000 balls at random from the bucket (similar to the problem in the

question). Now, if you would take those balls with replacement, you would take a ball, note its number, and put it back into the bucket, meaning the next time you take a ball from the bucket there

would be a chance you could take the exact same ball again. If you took the balls without replacement, you would leave the ball outside the bucket and not put it back in as you take the next 999

balls.

itemsDf.sample(fraction=1000, seed=98263)

Wrong. The fraction parameter needs to have a value between 0 and 1. In this case, it should be 0.1, since 1,000/10,000 = 0.1.

itemsDf.sampleBy("row", fractions={0: 0.1}, seed=82371)

No, DataFrame.sampleBy() is meant for stratified sampling. This means that based on the values in a column in a DataFrame, you can draw a certain fraction of rows containing those values from

the DataFrame (more details linked below). In the scenario at hand, sampleBy is not the right operator to use because you do not have any information about any column that the sampling should

depend on.

itemsDf.sample(fraction=0.1)

Incorrect. This code block checks all the boxes except that it does not ensure that when you run it a second time, the exact same rows will be returned. In order to achieve this, you would have to

specify a seed.

More info:

- pyspark.sql.DataFrame.sample — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

- pyspark.sql.DataFrame.sampleBy — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

- Types of Samplings in PySpark 3. The explanations of the sampling… | by Pinar Ersoy | Towards Data Science