Databricks-Certified-Associate-Developer-for-Apache-Spark-3.0 Exam Dumps : Databricks Certified Associate Developer for Apache Spark 3.0 Exam

Explanation

Correct code block: transactionsDf.drop("productId", "f")

This QUESTION NO: requires a lot of thinking to get right. For solving it, you may take advantage of the digital notepad that is provided to you during the test. You have probably seen that the code

block

includes multiple errors. In the test, you are usually confronted with a code block that only contains a single error. However, since you are practicing here, this challenging multi-error QUESTION

NO: will

make it easier for you to deal with single-error questions in the real exam.

The select operator should be replaced by a drop operator, the column names should be listed directly as arguments to the operator and not as a list, and all column names should be expressed as

strings without being wrapped in a col() operator.

Correct! Here, you need to figure out the many, many things that are wrong with the initial code block. While the QUESTION NO: can be solved by using a select statement, a drop statement, given

the

answer options, is the correct one. Then, you can read in the documentation that drop does not take a list as an argument, but just the column names that should be dropped. Finally, the column

names should be expressed as strings and not as Python variable names as in the original code block.

The column names should be listed directly as arguments to the operator and not as a list.

Incorrect. While this is a good first step and part of the correct solution (see above), this modification is insufficient to solve the question.

The column names should be listed directly as arguments to the operator and not as a list and following the pattern of how column names are expressed in the code block, columns productId and f

should be replaced by transactionId, predError, value and storeId.

Wrong. If you use the same pattern as in the original code block (col(productId), col(f)), you are still making a mistake. col(productId) will trigger Python to search for the content of a variable named

productId instead of telling Spark to use the column productId - for that, you need to express it as a string.

The select operator should be replaced by a drop operator, the column names should be listed directly as arguments to the operator and not as a list, and all col() operators should be removed.

No. This still leaves you with Python trying to interpret the column names as Python variables (see above).

The select operator should be replaced by a drop operator.

Wrong, this is not enough to solve the question. If you do this, you will still face problems since you are passing a Python list to drop and the column names are still interpreted as Python variables

(see above).

More info: pyspark.sql.DataFrame.drop — PySpark 3.1.2 documentation

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 3, QUESTION NO: 30 (Databricks import instructions)

While only one of these code blocks works, the DataFrame API is pretty flexible when it comes to accepting columns into the pow() method. The following code blocks would also work:

transactionsDf.withColumn("predErrorSquared", pow("predError", 2))

transactionsDf.withColumn("predErrorSquared", pow("predError", lit(2)))

Static notebook | Dynamic notebook: See test 1, QUESTION NO: 26 (Databricks import instructions) ,

Explanation

Correct code block:

transactionsDf.join(broadcast(itemsDf), "transactionId", "left_semi")

This QUESTION NO: is extremely difficult and exceeds the difficulty of questions in the exam by far.

A first indication of what is asked from you here is the remark that "the query should be executed in an optimized way". You also have qualitative information about the size of itemsDf and

transactionsDf. Given that itemsDf is "very small" and that the execution should be optimized, you should consider instructing Spark to perform a broadcast join, broadcasting the "very small"

DataFrame itemsDf to all executors. You can explicitly suggest this to Spark via wrapping itemsDf into a broadcast() operator. One answer option does not include this operator, so you can disregard

it. Another answer option wraps the broadcast() operator around transactionsDf - the bigger of the two DataFrames. This answer option does not make sense in the optimization context and can

likewise be disregarded.

When thinking about the broadcast() operator, you may also remember that it is a method of pyspark.sql.functions. One answer option, however, resolves to itemsDf.broadcast([...]). The DataFrame

class has no broadcast() method, so this answer option can be eliminated as well.

All two remaining answer options resolve to transactionsDf.join([...]) in the first 2 gaps, so you will have to figure out the details of the join now. You can pick between an outer and a left semi join. An

outer join would include columns from both DataFrames, where a left semi join only includes columns from the "left" table, here transactionsDf, just as asked for by the question. So, the correct

answer is the one that uses the left_semi join.