CTFL-AcT Exam Dumps : ISTQB Certified Tester - Acceptance Testing (CT-AcT)

Performance testing assesses how a system behaves under specific conditions, typically focusing on responsiveness, stability, and resource usage. The type of performance test depends on the workload model:

Load testing evaluates performance under expected peak usage.

Stress testing pushes the system beyond its capacity to assess limits.

Endurance/stability testing checks for performance degradation over extended periods.

Option A correctly describes that performance test types are determined by the workload simulation strategy.

Other options:

B confuses performance with security testing — malicious attack robustness is a security focus, not performance.

C is partly correct but less comprehensive than A. While testing should simulate realistic conditions, categorization into stress/load/endurance is better aligned with workload modeling.

D is misleading — performance tests validate systems against performance requirements; they are not primarily used to define them.

Answer: A. Depending on the model used to simulate the workload, performance tests are called load, stress or endurance / stability tests.

Effective test reporting should be tailored to the audience’s role and needs. Project managers are typically concerned with high-level progress, schedules, risks, and milestones. Progress trend charts (e.g., test execution over time, defect trends) provide insights into how the project is advancing and help identify delays or bottlenecks.

Option B is correct as it fits the informational needs of a project manager.

Other options:

A: Defect reports are too detailed for steering groups, which prefer strategic summaries or risk reports.

C: Pie charts may provide high-level summaries, but development teams usually need detailed defect or test result data.

D: System users (e.g., customers) are not responsible for project risks and would not benefit from test risk rankings.

Answer: B. Progress trend charts for the project manager

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation (Approx. 200 words):

Acceptance criteria should focus on business-relevant outcomes that are specific, testable, and observable. In this user story, the goal is to validate that the registration functionality is available and behaves as expected.

Let's analyze each proposition:

i) “A registration form is displayed on the screen.”

→ Valid. It is observable, specific, and directly aligned with the user story.

ii) “The form is written in the Groovy language; the cursor is initially set on the ‘login’ field...”

→ Invalid as acceptance criteria. It contains implementation details (e.g., “Groovy language”) irrelevant to business stakeholders. Also, low-level UI behavior like cursor position is overly technical and not a business-driven criterion.

iii) “I cannot register myself if the login I choose is used by another player.”

→ Valid. It defines system behavior based on a business rule (unique login) and is testable.

iv) “After successful registration process I am informed about it by an e-mail.”

→ Valid. It describes a user-visible outcome after registration, which is observable and testable.

Correct answer: D. only i), iii), and iv) are well-written acceptance criteria.

Exact Reference – ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus (Section 1.3.2):

“Acceptance criteria must describe the externally visible and verifiable system behavior, excluding implementation details.”