iSQI CTFL-AcT Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

This user story is about a logged-in user measuring their blood sugar using a connected glucose meter and seeing the result quickly. The acceptance criterion specifies that the result should be displayed in less than four seconds.

Option B is correct because:

It starts with a valid GIVEN precondition (“I am logged in”).

The WHEN step matches the functionality described in the user story (blood sugar measurement using a connected device).

The THEN step explicitly includes the performance expectation (“less than 4 seconds”), aligning directly with the acceptance criterion.

Other options:

A is incorrect — while it mentions the correct functionality, “I am diabetic” is not a necessary system precondition.

C refers to blood pressure instead of blood sugar — mismatched with the user story.

D introduces additional functionality (alerts for hypo-/hyperglycemia), which is not part of the specified acceptance criteria.

Answer: B. GIVEN I am logged in on the system … THEN I can see the result … in less than 4 second

Poorly defined requirements are a leading cause of defects and project failure. According to the ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus and IQBBA FL Syllabus, the quality of requirements plays a critical role in successful solution development and acceptance testing. Requirements must be clear, unambiguous, complete, and testable. When they are vague or ambiguous, stakeholders may interpret them differently, which can lead to incorrect implementations, inadequate testing, and ultimately rework or rejection during acceptance.

Option A is explicitly supported by the ISTQB Foundation Syllabus and IQBBA principles. In contrast:

Option B is incorrect because Agile lifecycles still place great emphasis on requirement engineering, even though requirements evolve iteratively.

Option C misrepresents INVEST: it is a guideline for writing good user stories but does not replace reviews or validation techniques.

Option D is risky and not endorsed by ISTQB. While testers may identify ambiguities, the correct approach is to clarify them with all relevant stakeholders, not make assumptions.

Exact Reference – ISTQB CTFL Acceptance Testing Syllabus (Section 1.3.1):

“Ambiguous, incomplete, or inconsistent requirements increase the risk of misunderstanding between stakeholders, leading to incorrect implementation and ineffective tests.”

Traceability is a key principle in requirements and test management. It ensures that all features, requirements, and tests are linked and accounted for. Including traceability to user stories in BPMN diagrams or DMN tables supports transparency, auditability, and maintenance.

Option B is correct because embedding or referencing traceability information within business models improves communication across stakeholders, ensures proper test coverage, and helps during change impact analysis.

Let’s evaluate other options:

Option A is incorrect. Trying to place all model elements in one diagram can lead to cluttered and unreadable models.

Option C is misleading. While separation of concerns is useful, traceability (links to requirements, risks) should be integrated or closely accessible from the models.

Option D is incorrect. Acceptance testers should be involved early to collaborate and review models. Waiting until models are finalized contradicts agile and ATDD principles.

Answer: B. BPMN diagrams and DMN tables should include information such as traceability to user stories.