CRISC Exam Dumps : Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control

The greatest concern for a risk practitioner with the use of a vulnerability scanning tool is the inaccurate reporting of results. A vulnerability scanning tool is a software that scans the network or system for known vulnerabilities and generates a report of the findings. However, the tool may produce false positives (reporting vulnerabilities that do not exist) or false negatives (missing vulnerabilities that do exist). This can lead to incorrect risk assessment, ineffective risk response, and wasted resources. Increased time to remediate vulnerabilities, increased number of vulnerabilities, and network performance degradation are other possible concerns, but they are not as critical as the inaccurate reporting of results. References = ISACA Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control (CRISC) Certification Exam Question and Answers, question 7; CRISC Review Manual, 6th Edition, page 202.

Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an enterprise is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. Risk appetite provides the most important information to facilitate a risk response decision, as it defines the boundaries and expectations for the risk management process. Risk appetite helps to determine the acceptable level of variation around the objectives, and to prioritize and allocate resources for the risk responses. Risk appetite also helps to align the risk management program with the enterprise’s strategy, culture, and values. The other options are not as important as risk appetite, as they provide different types of information for the risk management process:

Audit findings are the results of the independent and objective examination of the risk management program, such as by internal or external auditors. Audit findings provide assurance and feedback on the effectiveness and efficiency of the risk management program, and may identify gaps or weaknesses that need to be addressed. Audit findings may influence the risk response decision, but they are not as essential as risk appetite, as they are based on the existing or past performance of the risk management program, and may not reflect the future or potential risks or opportunities.

Key risk indicators are the metrics that measure the changes in the level of risk exposure, such as by monitoring the risk drivers, triggers, or events. Key risk indicators provide information on the current or emerging risks, and may alert the enterprise to take action or adjust the risk response. Key risk indicators may influence the risk response decision, but they are not as essential as risk appetite, as they are based on the observed or estimated data or trends, and may not account for the uncertainties or complexities of the risks.

Industry best practices are the methods or techniques that have been proven to be effective or efficient in managing risks, such as by benchmarking or adopting standards or frameworks. Industry best practices provide guidance and direction on how to implement the risk management program, and may improve the quality or consistency of the risk response. Industry best practices may influence the risk response decision, but they are not as essential as risk appetite, as they are based on the experiences or recommendations of other enterprises, and may not be suitable or applicable for the specific context or objectives of the enterprise. References = Risk and Information Systems Control Study Manual, 7th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.1.1, pp. 18-19.

Project risk register: A document that records the identified risks, their likelihood, impact, and mitigation strategies for a project1.

Project steering committee: A group of senior stakeholders and experts who oversee and support a project from a higher level2.

Risk mitigation actions: The measures taken to prevent, reduce, or transfer the risks that may affect a project3.

The most important objective of regularly presenting the project risk register to the project steering committee is to track the status of risk mitigation actions. Tracking the status of risk mitigation actions can help the project steering committee to:

Monitor and measure the performance and effectiveness of the risk management process and controls

Evaluate the progress and outcomes of the risk mitigation actions against the project goals and objectives

Identify and resolve any issues, challenges, or gaps in the risk mitigation actions

Provide guidance, feedback, and support to the project manager and the project team

Adjust or revise the risk mitigation actions as needed to reflect the changes in the project scope, schedule, budget, or environment

The other options are not the most important objective of regularly presenting the project risk register to the project steering committee, although they may be relevant or beneficial. Allocating budget for resolution of risk issues, which means assigning financial resources to address and resolve the risks that may affect a project, may be a part of the risk management process, but it is not the primary purpose of presenting the project risk register, which is more focused on tracking and reporting the risk status and actions. Determining if new risk scenarios have been identified, which means finding out if there are any additional or emerging risks that may impact a project, may be a useful outcome of presenting the project risk register, but it is not the main objective, which is more concerned with tracking and reporting the existing risk status and actions. Ensuring the project timeline is on target, which means verifying that the project is progressing according to the planned schedule and milestones, may be a benefit of presenting the project risk register, but it is not the key objective, which is more related to tracking and reporting the risk status and actions.

References = Risk Register: A Project Manager’s Guide with Examples [2023] • Asana, Project Steering Committee: Roles, Best Practices, Challenges, Risk Mitigation: Definition, Strategies, and Examples