Isaca CGEIT Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The most efficient approach for using risk scenarios to evaluate a new business opportunity is to identify risk events from both bottom-up and top-down perspectives. This means that the risk identification process should consider both the specific details of the opportunity, such as the market, customer, product, service, technology, and resources involved, as well as the broader context of the opportunity, such as the strategic objectives, vision, mission, values, and culture of the organization. By using both bottom-up and top-down approaches, the risk identification process can capture a comprehensive and balanced view of the potential risks that could affect the success of the opportunity. This will help to create realistic and relevant risk scenarios that can be analyzed and evaluated for decision-making purposes. A bottom-up approach alone may miss some important risks that are related to the organization’s strategy, governance, or environment, while a top-down approach alone may overlook some specific risks that are unique to the opportunity or its implementation. Therefore, a combination of both approaches is the most efficient way to use risk scenarios for evaluating a new business opportunity. References := What is business risk? | McKinsey, How to Write Strong Risk Scenarios and Statements - ISACA, Finding your blind spots: Recognising emerging risks and opportunities

The finding that should be of greatest concern to senior management is that response decisions were made without consulting the appropriate authority. This is because response decisions are critical actions that can affect the outcome and impact of a security incident, and they should be made by the designated authority who has the responsibility and accountability for the incident response. According to CISA, the Department of Justice, through the FBI and the NCIJTF, is the lead agency for threat response during a significant incident, with DHS’s investigative agencies—the Secret Service and ICE/HSI - playing a crucial role in criminal investigations1. If response decisions are made without consulting the appropriate authority, it may result in:

• Legal or regulatory violations: The response actions may not comply with the applicable laws or regulations, such as data breach notification, evidence preservation, or privacy protection. This may expose the organization to legal or regulatory penalties, lawsuits, or reputational damage.
• Ineffective or counterproductive actions: The response actions may not be aligned with the incident response plan, best practices, or standard operating procedures. This may cause more harm than good, such as escalating the incident, destroying evidence, or compromising recovery efforts.
• Lack of coordination and communication: The response actions may not be coordinated or communicated with the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, legal counsel, public relations, or external partners. This may lead to confusion, inconsistency, or mistrust among the parties involved in the incident response.

Therefore, senior management should be most concerned about the finding that response decisions were made without consulting the appropriate authority, and they should take corrective actions to prevent this from happening again in the future. References: Cybersecurity Incident Response | CISA1

 An updated business case for IT resourcing is a document that provides the rationale and justification for the proposed changes in the IT staff structure, such as the number, roles, skills, and costs of the IT personnel. An updated business case for IT resourcing should align with the IT strategy and objectives, as well as the business needs and expectations. An updated business case for IT resourcing should also include the benefits, risks, and impacts of the IT staff restructure, as well as the alternatives and recommendations12.

The other options are not as effective as an updated business case for IT resourcing to support an IT staff restructure. Established IT key performance indicators (KPIs) are measures that evaluate the performance and outcomes of the IT department, such as service quality, customer satisfaction, project delivery, and innovation. Established IT KPIs are important for monitoring and reporting the IT results and achievements, but they do not necessarily support an IT staff restructure, unless they are linked to the proposed changes in the IT staff structure3. IT staff training program requirements are specifications that define the learning needs and objectives of the IT personnel, such as skills development, knowledge enhancement, and career advancement. IT staff training program requirements are beneficial for improving the capabilities and competencies of the IT staff, but they do not directly support an IT staff restructure, unless they are aligned with the new roles and responsibilities of the IT personnel4. External IT staffing benchmarks are standards or best practices that compare the IT staff structure of other organizations or industries, such as staffing ratios, skill levels, or salary ranges. External IT staffing benchmarks are useful for assessing and improving the competitiveness and efficiency of the IT department, but they do not adequately support an IT staff restructure, unless they are customized and adapted to the specific context and situation of the organization5.

References: 1: How to Write a Business Case: 4 Steps to a Perfect Business Case Template - ProjectManager.com 2: How to Write a Business Case ― 4 Steps to a Perfect Business Case Template | Workfront 3: 18 Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Examples Defined - ClearPoint Strategy 4: How to Create an Effective Training Program: 8 Steps to Success - Convergence Training Blog 5: How to Benchmark Your Staffing Levels - HR Daily Advisor