Free and Premium APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Dumps Questions Answers

How charges for the preferred service provider's offer have been modelled, including the resultant benefits.

Capital and revenue implications of the resultant deal, including any costs falling to the organization.

Net effect on the organization's charges (prices), if any.

Service streams and outputs being contracted for.

To increase the utilization of teachers from 75% to 90% within three years.

To reduce travel times for staff and students to and from the new campus.

To absorb up to 30% growth in the number of 16 to 18-year-old learners within the current establishment of support staff.

To create a healthy competition between learning providers to benefit learners.

Accountancy treatment of the negotiated deal.

Explanation of any personnel implications.

Contingency arrangement for overspends.

Payment premiums for risk transfer.

Plan, in detail, the construction of the new learning campus.

Appoint a Senior Responsible Owner for the Pittville project.

Produce regular reports on progress of the development of the new learning campus for the Senior Responsible Owner of the project.

Develop the preferred way forward for the Pittville project.

The Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning for 11 to 18 year olds throughout the Western Area.

The redefinition of jobs is to be negotiated with teaching unions and communicated to all staff.

A financial special advisor has been appointed from Western Area Finance, an auditing organization.

Plans could meet with substantial opposition from parents and staff.

Staff at the new campus will automatically become employees of Pittville University with the same terms and conditions of employment.

The parties shall attempt to resolve any dispute through negotiations between senior executives of the parties, who have authority to settle the same.

The new campus building is to be listed as an asset on the Local Education Authority balance sheet.

The return on the investment will repay the sum of the original investment over 10 years.

The contract period for development of the new campus is three years.

There will be a funding gap in Year 2 when the Expenditure is forecast to exceed the Income.

The affordability of the scheme is NOT dependent upon the income from the sale of Pittville High School.

Income from the hire of the sports facilities should NOT be shown as a separate source of income.

Funding to help pay for the construction of the new campus should be shown as a separate source of income in the Revenue Budget.

Local Education Authority (LEA) Funding should be moved to the Economic Appraisal.

The cost of any changes to the contract will need to be authorized by the Programme Change Board.

The new campus building is to be listed as an asset on the Local Education Authority balance sheet.

The return on the investment will repay the sum of the original investment over 10 years.

The contract period for development of the new campus is three years.

20% of the contract price is to be paid up front for materials.

Targeted outcomes and 'where we want to be'.

The problems, difficulties and inadequacies associated with 'where we are now'.

The boundaries, or limitations, of the project.

How services are currently organized, provided and supplied.

Public value in terms of return for money spent.

No, because Pittville University should NOT be involved in the development of the Strategic Case.

No, because the business scope should determine the affected business areas, functionality and organization.

Yes, because the Old Fire Station Headquarters site has good access from most parts of Pittville.

Yes, because the business scope of the Pittville project should be based on a short list of options.

The Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning for 14-19- year-olds throughout the Western Area.

Formal meetings have been held over the past nine months to establish the goals to be achieved.

Pittville is the commercial, retail and cultural centre of Topland, with a population of circa22,000.

There are problems accessing learning in some parts of the region.

There is a shortage of higher education establishments in the region.

Amend entry 1, because all projects should use a benefits register to identify key benefits and how they will be tracked.

Amend entry 1, because the benefits realization strategy for the project should outline how the programme's approach to realizing benefits is being adapted for the project.

Amend entry 2, because the potential benefits from the project should be documented only in the Economic Case.

No change to entry 2, because when a project is part of a wider programme, benefits should be tracked only at the programme level.

No change to entry 2, because tracking benefits at the programme level will help to avoid double counting of benefits from different projects.

No, because the Financial Appraisal should NOT contain revenue costs.

No, because construction and refurbishment costs should be treated as capital costs.

Yes, because all construction costs must be accounted for.

Yes, because these represent a cost of developing the scheme.

To ensure that all learning providers for 16 to 18-year-olds are able to offer effective learning.

To reduce staff turnover in the next two years.

To increase the achievement of qualifications by a minimum of 15% within three years.

To provide all education courses with immediate effect.

No, because the benefits are greater for Option A.

No, because the public sector test discount rate has been applied.

Yes, because option B has positive liquidity.

Yes, because Option B has the higher NPSV.

Teaching staff will automatically become employees at the new campus with the same terms and conditions of employment.

The selected contractor will be responsible for taking measures to reduce any potential errors in the construction phase.

All construction work is to comply with standard building regulations.

The new campus building is to be listed as an asset on the Local Education Authority balance sheet.

The Local Education Authority is best placed to respond to possible opposition from staff and parents.

The Pittville Project Manager is responsible for producing regular progress reports for the Senior Responsible Owner of the project.

The local university has proposed to run a series of workshops in the Western Area to prepare for university applications.

The rationalization of courses to improve pupil/teacher ratios.

The Reference Project is based on using the same property management company that maintains Pittville University.

The Western Area Learning Improvement Programme Director is responsible for delivering the benefits of the Pittville project.

The monitoring of anticipated benefits is to be assessed every year, for a ten-year period.

The rate of 16-18 year olds in education and training to be increased by at least 15% within three years.

New roles will be identified, advertised and assigned before the start of the second academic year of the implementation.

Amend entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be confirmed within the OBC.

Delete entry 1, because schools and universities will be responsible for the delivery of the benefits.

No change to entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be revisited and re-affirmed within the FBC.

Amend entry 2, because the project manager is responsible for benefits realization.

No change to entry 2, because this is appropriate to this section.

No, because the funding statement is provided in the Financial Case.

No, because the Economic Case should have already quantified this funding risk.

Yes, because alternative monies may be available to fund proposals that offer demonstrably better value for money.

Yes, because scenario analysis should reflect the political uncertainties on which the success of the proposal depends.

No, because the regulations are an externally imposed parameter or constraint.

No, because dependencies should NOT be recorded within the Strategic Outline Case.

Yes, because any actions or developments required by others should be considered if the success of the project is dependent upon them.

Yes, because success of the project is dependent upon compliance with these regulations.

No, because risks should be identified in the Outline Business Case.

No, because this is a service risk associated with the design and build phases of the project.

Yes, because the local planning authority is an external organization.

Yes, because changes to the Old Fire Station Headquarters site will affect the environment.

The cost of building the new campus should be included in this table.

Staffing costs should be moved to the Economic Appraisal.

To be useful this table should cover the lifetime of the asset.

Equipment costs should be moved to the capital costs.

The cost of finance should be moved to the Economic Appraisal.

New opportunities will be available for teachers to be involved in delivering the new education courses.

The 'BAU/status quo' option is the baseline for assessing value for money.

There is a reasonably positive reaction from local schools to the Old Fire Station Headquarters being used as a second site.

The demographic forecasts are for further reductions in the demand for places over the next five years.

A new campus would provide modern and better facilities at a cheaper cost than refitting existing buildings.

Should be carried forward to the short listed options.

Delivers against one or more of the critical success factors.

Will represent a benchmark for Value For Money throughout the appraisal process.

Supports one or more of the Spending Objectives.

Incorrectly identified as a Scoping Solution.

20% of the contract price is to be paid up front for materials.

To increase the rate of 16-18-year-olds participating in education and training by at least 15% within the next three years.

The major users of the finished campus will be 16-18 year old learners.

The selected contractor will be responsible for taking measures to reduce any potential errors in the construction phase.

All intellectual property rights are to be maintained by the Local Education Authority.

No, because the anticipated benefits will remain the same.

No, because the sale price of the site is an opportunity cost which is irrelevant to the Economic Appraisal.

Yes, because the FBC must be re-submitted for re-approval if the costs vary significantly.

Yes, because the FBC should be based on accurate Economic Appraisals for all options.