APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 Absorption costing is a method of allocating all manufacturing costs to the units produced. It includes both fixed and variable costs in the calculation of the unit cost. In this example, the fixed cost per unit is §10, which is obtained by dividing the total fixed cost of §200,000 by the number of units produced (20,000). This fixed cost per unit is then added to the variable cost per unit to get the total unit cost under absorption costing. Variable costing, on the other hand, only assigns variable costs to the units produced and treats fixed costs as period costs. Activity-based costing (ABC) is a method of allocating overhead costs to products or services based on the activities they consume. Overhead costing is a general term that refers to any method of assigning overhead costs to products or services. References:

• CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Module 2: Demand Management, Section 2.4: Costing Methods and Cost Behavior
• CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Module 3: Supply, Section 3.5: Cost Management

 Improvements in an input/output control (I/O control) system will most likely lead to a reduction in queue size and queue time. An I/O control system is a method of managing the flow of work orders in a production system by matching the input rate to the output rate. The input rate is the number of work orders that are released to the shop floor in a given period. The output rate is the number of work orders that are completed and shipped to the customers in a given period. An I/O control system aims to keep the input rate equal to the output rate, or slightly lower, to avoid overloading the system and creating excess inventory. By improving the I/O control system, the production system can achieve a smoother and more balanced flow of work orders, which reduces the queue size and queue time at each work center. Queue size is the number of work orders that are waiting to be processed at a work center. Queue time is the amount of time that a work order spends in the queue before being processed. A reduction in queue size and queue time can improve the production efficiency, quality, and flexibility, as well as the customer service and satisfaction. The other options are not correct, as they are not the most likely outcomes of improvements in an I/O control system, but rather possible effects of other factors or methods:

• Flattened bills of material (BOMs) are the result of simplifying the product structure and reducing the number of components or levels in a BOM. Flattened BOMs can reduce the complexity and lead time of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system.
• A change in operation sequencing is the result of altering the order or priority of the work orders or operations in a production system. A change in operation sequencing can affect the production flow and capacity, but it is not necessarily caused by the I/O control system.
• Fewer engineering change notifications are the result of minimizing the changes in the product design or specification during the production process. Fewer engineering change notifications can reduce the disruption and cost of the production process, but they are not directly related to the I/O control system. References:
• [CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]
• Input/Output Control | SpringerLink
• Input/Output Control - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
• Input/Output Control - InventoryOps.com

Concurrent engineering is a method of designing and developing products in which the different stages run simultaneously, rather than consecutively. It decreases product development time and also the number of errors and rework. By involving all the relevant stakeholders, such as engineering, manufacturing, marketing, and purchasing, in the design process from the beginning, concurrent engineering reduces the need for product design changes later in the product life cycle. References:

•APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 15

•[APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 2, Section B, p. 2-17