Big Black Friday Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer
Exam Name:
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
293
Last Updated:
Nov 29, 2025
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice exam demo.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

What is the main difference between an audit program and an audit plan?

Options:

A.

An audit program outlines the activities and arrangements for a particular audit, while an audit plan provides an overarching framework for a series of audits with specific timelines and purposes

B.

An audit program outlines the overarching framework for a series of audits with specific timelines and purposes, while an audit plan outlines the activities and arrangements for a particular audit

C.

An audit program outlines policies, procedures, or requirements for reference in audit evidence comparison, while an audit plan provides an overarching framework for a series of audits with specific timelines and purposes

Buy Now
Question 2

Scenario 9:

OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.

Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically. This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.

Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:

"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department."

However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process. Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.

Based on scenario 9, was it acceptable that the top management rejected the action plan submitted by Julia?

Options:

A.

Yes, an action plan must be submitted to address each nonconformity separately

B.

No, top management should have approved the action plan submitted by Julia

C.

No, a general action plan can be submitted to address all nonconformities at once

Question 3

Scenario 3: Auto Tsaab, a Swedish Car manufacturer founded in and headquartered in Sweden, iS well-known for its innovation in the automotive industry, Despite this Strong reputation, the

company has faced considerable challenges managing its documented information.

Although manual methods of handling this information may have been sufficient in the past, they now pose substantial challenges. particularly in efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. Moreover, entrusting the

responsibility Of managing documented information to a single individual creates a critical vulnerability, introducing a potential single point Of failure within the organization's information management system,

To address these challenges and reinforce its commitment to protecting information assets, Auto Tsaab implemented an information security management system ISMS aligned with ISO/IEC 27001. This move

was critical 10 ensuring the security, confidentiality, and integrity of the companys information, particularly as it transitioned from manual to automated information management methods.

initially, Auto Tsaab established automated checking Systems that detect and Correct corruption. By implementing these automated checks, Auto Tsaab not only improved its ability to maintain data accuracy and

consistency but also significantly reduced the risk of undetected errors.

Central to Auto ISMS ate documented processes. By documenting essential aspects and processes Such as the ISMS scope, information security policy, operational planning and control, information

security risk assessment, internal audit. and management review. Auto Tsaab ensured that these documents were readily available and adequately protected. Moreover. Auto Tsaab utilizes a comprehensive

framework incorporating 36 distinct categories spanning products, services. hardware, and software. This framework. organized in a two-dimensional matrix with six rows and six columns, facilitates the

specification of technical details for components and assemblies in its small automobiles. underscoring the company's commitment to innovation and quality,

TO maintain the industry standards. Auto Tsaab follows rigorous protocols in personnel selection. guaranteeing that every team member is not only eligible but also well-suited for their respective roles within the

organization. Additionally, the company established formal procedures for handling policy violations and appointed an internal consultant to continuously enhance its documentation and security practices.

After committing to ISO/IEC 27001 adherence, was the documented information in Auto Tsaab’s information security management system managed in compliance with the standard?

Options:

A.

Yes, the company relied only on manual methods for managing documented information

B.

Yes, the company ensured that documented information was available and protected as needed

C.

Yes, the company delegated the responsibility of managing documented information to a single individual