Winter Sale - Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: top65certs

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer
Exam Name:
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
293
Last Updated:
Nov 22, 2025
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice exam demo.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

Scenario 7: Yefund, an insurance Company headquartered in Monaco, is a reliable name in Commerce, industry, and Corporate services. With a rich history spanning decades, Yefund has consistently delivered

tailored insurance solutions to businesses of all sizes. safeguarding their assets and mitigating risks. As a forward-thinking company, Yetund recognizes the importance of information security in protecting

sensitive data and maintaining the trust Of Its clients. Thus, has embarked on a transformative journey towards implemenung an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001-

iS implementing cutting-edge Al technologies within its ISMS to improve the identification and management Of information assets, Through Al. is automating the identification Of assets. tracking

changes over time. and strategically selecting controls based on asset sensitivity and exposure. This proactive approach ensures that Yefund remains agile and adaptive in safeguarding critical information assets

against emerging threats. Although Yetund recognized the urgent need to enhance its security posture, the implementation team took a gradual approach to integrate each ISMS element- Rather than waiting for

an official launch, they carefully tested and validated security controls, gradually putting each element into operational mode as it was completed and approved. This methodical process ensured that critical

security measures, such as encryption protocols. access controls. and monitoring systems. were fully operational and effective in safeguarding customer information, including personal. policy, and financial

details.

Recently. Kian. a member of Vefund's information security team. identified two security events. Upon evaluation. one reported incident did not meet the criteria to be classified as such- However, the second

incident. involving critical network components experiencing downtime. raised concerns about potential risks to sensitive data security and was therefore categorized as an incident. The first event was recorded

as a report without further action, whereas the second incident prompted a series Of actions, including investigation. containment, eradication, recovery. resolution, closure, incident reporting, and post-incident

activities. Additionally. IRTS were established to address the events according to their Categorization.

After the incident. Yetund recognized the development of internal communication protocols as the single need to improve their ISMS framework It determined the relevance of communication aspects such as

what, when, with whom. and how to Communicate effectively Yefund decided to focus On developing internal communication protocols, reasoning that internal coordination their most immediate priority. This

decision was made despite having external stakeholders. such as clients and regulatory bodies. who also required secure and timely communication.

Additionally, Yefund has prioritized the professional development Of its employees through comprehensive training programs, Yefund assessed the effectiveness and impact Of its training initiatives through

Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model. From measuring trainees' involvement and impressions of the training (Level 1) to evaluating learning outcomes (Level 2), post-training behavior (Level 3), and

tangible results (Level 4), Yefund ensures that Its training programs ate holistic. impactful. and aligned With organizational objectives.

Yefund•s journey toward implementing an ISMS reflects a commitment to security, innovation, and continuous improvement, By leveraging technology, fostering a culture Of proactive vigilance, enhancing

communication ptotOCOlS, and investing in employee development. Yefund seeks to fortify its position as a trusted partner in safeguarding the interests Of its Clients and stakeholders.

Based on scenario 7, is Yefund's integration of ISMS elements acceptable?

Options:

A.

No, it is advisable to temporarily delay operational mode until all elements are completed

B.

Yes, ISMS elements can be completed, approved, and put into operational mode gradually

C.

No, it should have activated the ISMS elements to judge their effectiveness and then completed and approved them based on their performance in operational mode

Buy Now
Question 2

Scenario 10: ProEBank

ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.

To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.

During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team

After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.

Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.

After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.

The certification body’s final decision for certification was made by a committee that included one auditor from the audit team and two other experts.

Question:

Is this acceptable?

Options:

A.

No – the certification body must ensure that persons that make the decision for certification are different from those who carried out the audit

B.

No – the committee should have included only members from the audit team and not other experts that were not part of the audit

C.

Yes – the committee must include one member from the audit team and other individuals working for the certification body

Question 3

Scenario 10: ProEBank

ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.

To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.

During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team

After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.

Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.

After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.

To prepare for their ISO/IEC 27001 certification audit, ProEBank trained employees, prepared documentation, and identified key personnel to support the audit. However, they did not conduct a self-assessment before the audit.

Question:

Did ProEBank follow all of the best practices while preparing for the certification audit?

Options:

A.

Yes – the company followed all of the best practices in preparation for the certification audit

B.

No – the company should have also conducted a self-assessment to prepare for the audit

C.

No – the company should not have informed its employees regarding the upcoming audit