PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Scenario 8: SecureLynx is one Of the largest cybersecurity advisory and consulting companies that helps private sector organizations prevent security threats. improve security systems. and achieve business

SecureLynr is committed to complying with national and international standards to enhance the company'S resilience and credibility_ SecureLynx has Started implementing an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001

as part of its relentless pursuit of security.

As part of the internal audit activities. the top management reviewed and approved the audit objectives to assess the effectiveness of SecureLynx•s ISMS During the audit, the internal auditor evaluated whether

top management Supports activities associated with the ISMS and if the toles and responsibilities Of relevant parties are Clearly defined. This rigorous examination is a testament to SecureLynx'S

commitment to continuous improvernent and alignment of security measures with organizational goals.

SecureLynx employs an innovative dashboard that visually represents implemented processes and controls to ensure transparency and accountability within the Organization. This tool Offers stakeholders a real-

time overview of security measures. empowering them to make informed decisions and swiftly respond to emerging threats. As part of this initiative, Paula was appointed to a new position entrusted with the

responsibility Of collecting, recordlng, and Stoting data to measure the effectiveness Of the ISMS-

Furthermore, SecureLynx conducts management reviews every six months to ensure its Systems are robust and continually improving. These reviews serve as a crucial mechanism for assessing the efficacy Of

security measures and identifying areas for enhancement. SecureLynx's dedication to implementing and maintaining a robust ISMS exemplifies its commitment to innovation and Client satisfaction.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.

Based on scenario 8, which internal audit activity is the internal auditor at SecureLynx performing?

Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.

In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.

During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.

SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.

In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 8, which of the following dashboards did SunDee utilize?

Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly

Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.

Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management

According to scenario 8, Tessa created a plan for ISMS monitoring and measurement and presented it to the top management Is this acceptable?