ITIL 4 Managing Professional ITIL-4-Transition Syllabus Exam Questions Answers

The value chain activity that ensures that products and services continually meet stakeholder expectations for quality, costs and time to market is design and transition. This activity involves the following steps12:

• Defining the requirements and specifications of the products and services based on the demand and feedback from the customers and other stakeholders.
• Designing the products and services according to the requirements and specifications, as well as the best practices and standards of the organization and the industry.
• Developing and testing the products and services to ensure that they meet the quality criteria and the expected outcomes.
• Deploying and releasing the products and services to the customers and users, ensuring that they are ready for use and operation.
• Validating and evaluating the products and services to ensure that they deliver the intended value and meet the stakeholder expectations.
• Transitioning the products and services from the development stage to the operational stage, ensuring that they are integrated with the existing processes, systems and resources of the organization. References: 1: ITIL 4 Create, Deliver and Support, AXELOS, 2019, p. 23-24 2: Value Chain Activity: Design & Transition - Altervista, 3

 Design thinking and service-dominant logic have in common that both involve collaborating with customers to ensure their needs are met. Design thinking is a human-centered approach to problem solving that emphasizes empathy, creativity, and experimentation. Service-dominant logic is a framework for understanding value creation, which focuses on the exchange of services between two or more entities. Both concepts share the following principles:

• Value is co-created by the provider and the customer in the context of use. The provider does not deliver value, but rather offers value propositions that the customer can accept or reject. The customer is an active participant in the value creation process, not a passive recipient of goods or services.
• The customer is the ultimate judge of value. The provider cannot determine the value of the offering in advance, but rather has to understand the customer’s needs, preferences, and expectations. The provider has to engage with the customer in an ongoing dialogue and feedback loop to ensure that the offering meets or exceeds the customer’s expectations.
• The offering is a holistic solution that integrates goods, services, and experiences. The provider does not differentiate between tangible and intangible products, but rather offers a complete solution that addresses the customer’s problem or opportunity. The provider has to design the offering in a way that delivers a positive customer experience and enhances the customer’s well-being. References:
• Exploring Overlaps and Differences in Service Dominant Logic and Design Thinking
• Service-Dominant Logic: Key Principles and History
• Service-Dominant Logic and How It Reframes Our Business Operations
• The New Paradigm: H2H Marketing

 Running safe to fail experiments that provide learning opportunities is the best option to improve staff behaviour, as it aligns with the ITIL 4 guiding principle of progress iteratively with feedback1. This principle encourages the use of experimentation and learning from failures to improve the service and the organization. By running safe to fail experiments, the staff can test new ideas, learn from the outcomes, and adapt their behaviour accordingly. This can foster a culture of innovation, collaboration, and continuous improvement in the IT department. The other options are not directly related to improving staff behaviour, but rather to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the service delivery. Comparing the cost of delay between work items to ensure that financially valuable work is prioritized is a technique for value stream optimization, which is part of the ITIL 4 practice of service value stream management2. Implementing CI/CD tools to deploy software quickly is a method for achieving high-velocity IT, which is one of the ITIL 4 specialist modules3. Adopting Kanban boards to visualize the flow of work across software development teams is a tool for implementing agile and lean approaches, which are also part of the ITIL 4 framework3. While these options may have some positive impact on staff behaviour, they are not the primary focus or the best way to achieve it. References: 3, 2, 1

 The most likely reason for an organization to delay a transformation to high velocity is that the organization is not ready for a cultural change. High velocity IT requires a significant shift in the mindset, values, and behaviors of the organization and its people, as well as the adoption of new ways of working, such as agile, lean, and DevOps. These changes can be challenging and disruptive for some organizations, especially those that have a traditional, hierarchical, or siloed culture. Therefore, the organization may need to assess its readiness and willingness for a cultural change before embarking on a transformation to high velocity IT. This reason is supported by the following references:

• ITIL 4 Specialist: High-velocity IT explores the ways in which digital organizations and digital operating models function in high velocity environments1
• ITIL 4 High-velocity IT: the digital enterprise2
• ITIL®4 Specialist: High Velocity IT3