Government Financial Manager CGFM Dumps PDF

Why Measure Performance Based on Cost per Ton of Trash Collected?

Costper ton of trash collectedis a direct, objective, and quantifiable measure of the contractor’s performance. It reflects how efficiently the contractor is operating relative to the amount of trash being managed.

This measure aligns with the principle of output-based performance evaluation, which focuses on results (e.g., tons of trash collected) rather than inputs or unrelated factors.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Per mile traveled:Mileage is not directly tied to performance; it depends on the route structure and geography, not the quantity of trash collected.

C. Comparison with closest comparable jurisdiction:While this may provide context, it is not a specific performance measure.

D. Per employee:Employee count does not directly measure performance or efficiency in trash collection operations.

References and Documents:

GAO Guide on Contract Performance Evaluation:Recommends using measurable and outcome-based metrics like cost per ton collected for performance reviews.

Best Practices in Local Government Contracting (AGA):Highlights output-based measures for evaluating contractor performance.

What Is Vertical Analysis?

Vertical Analysisevaluates a single year's financial statements by expressing each line item as a percentage of a base amount. For example, in an income statement, each expense may be presented as a percentage of total revenue.

This approach helps users understand the relative size of each financial statement item within the context of the total.

Why Is Vertical Analysis Used for a Single Year?

Vertical analysis focuses solely on relationships within a single set of financial statements, making it the appropriate choice for single-year evaluations.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Comparative:Involves comparing financial data across entities or periods, not within a single year.

B. Horizontal:Focuses on changes in financial data over time (year-to-year comparisons).

C. Trend:Examines patterns over multiple periods to identify long-term trends, not a single year.

References and Documents:

GAO Financial Audit Manual:Recommends vertical analysis for single-year financial statement evaluations.

AICPA Financial Statement Analysis Guide:Provides detailed examples of vertical analysis techniques.

Type of Engagement for Reviewing Pilot Programs:

A performance audit evaluates theeffectiveness, efficiency, and economyof programs or operations.

In this case, the review of the pilot program assessed the number of families served and the efficiencies achieved through community involvement, which aligns with performance auditing objectives.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Financial audit: Focuses on the accuracy of financial statements, not program effectiveness or efficiency.

B. Single audit: Focuses on compliance with federal grant requirements, not program evaluation.

C. Performance audit: Correct. This type of audit reviews program outcomes and operational efficiencies.

D. Attestation: Provides assurance on specific subject matter but does not evaluate program performance.

References:

GAO,Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).

Association of Government Accountants (AGA),Performance Auditing Best Practices.

Governmental Attestation Engagements:

These engagements involve providing assurance on specific elements of financial or non-financial information, such as compliance with laws, contracts, or bond covenants.

Reviewing revenue coverage requirements for outstanding bonds fits the scope of attestation engagements, which focus on confirming adherence to specific requirements.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Monitor a subgrantee for compliance to the grant restrictions: Monitoring is a management responsibility, not typically part of an attestation engagement.

B. Establish a policy concerning fraud prevention: Establishing policies is a management duty, not a task for auditors.

C. Monitor purchasing card charges for compliance with travel policies: Monitoring is operational, not attestation-related.

D. Review the revenue coverage requirements on outstanding bonds: Correct. This falls within the scope of attestation engagements.

References:

GAO,Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).

AICPA,Attestation Standards for Government Engagements.