Scenario A: Nexus Sprint Review with Five Scrum Teams
There are five Scrum Teams working on a product. During the Nexus Sprint Review, the teams
present the results of the Sprint. After introductions, each team takes time to present their work
for inspection by individually showing the new features they have built. They are not using a
shared environment. The stakeholders do not provide much feedback. The event ends and
people filter out of the room.
What could help this Nexus create a single Integrated Increment for inspection at the Nexus
Sprint Review?
(choose the best answer)
Scenario A: Nexus Sprint Review with Five Scrum Teams
There are five Scrum Teams working on a product. During the Nexus Sprint Review, the teams
present the results of the Sprint. After introductions, each team takes time to present their work
for inspection by individually showing the new features they have built. They are not using a
shared environment. The stakeholders do not provide much feedback. The event ends and
people filter out of the room.
If this pattern of Nexus Sprint Reviews continues for multiple Sprints, what may be the effects?
(choose the best two answers)
Scenario B: Six Team Nexus with complex dependencies
A six team Nexus is developing a complex product, with different parts of the product that only
certain Scrum Teams can work on. In fact, there are some highly specialized individuals outside
the Nexus that are required for some of the work. In past Sprints the Nexus encountered
challenges dealing with the many dependencies between Scrum Teams.
Which of the following practices could this Nexus try in order to conduct Nexus Sprint Planning
more effectively?
(choose the best two answers)
Who has overall responsibility for ensuring Nexus Sprint Retrospective occurs?
(choose the best answer)