SPLK-5001 Exam Dumps : Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst

The MITRE ATT&CK framework categorizes Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) used by attackers. It is a globally accessible knowledge base of adversarial tactics and techniques based on real-world observations, and it is widely used by cybersecurity professionals to understand and defend against various cyber threats.

Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs):

Tactics:The high-level goals that attackers aim to achieve during an attack. For example, gaining initial access to a network.

Techniques:The specific methods used to achieve these tactics, such as phishing or exploiting a vulnerability.

Procedures:The detailed steps and tools that attackers use to implement a technique.

MITRE ATT&CK Framework:MITRE ATT&CK organizes these TTPs into a matrix that reflects different stages of an attack lifecycle, from initial access to exfiltration. The framework helps security teams by:

Mapping Detection and Defense:Organizations can map their existing detection capabilities against the ATT&CK matrix to identify gaps.

Threat Hunting:Security teams use the framework to guide their threat-hunting activities, focusing on specific techniques associated with known adversaries.

Incident Response:During incident response, analysts can use the ATT&CK framework to understand the behaviors exhibited by an attacker, which helps in creating effective containment and eradication strategies.

Why MITRE ATT&CK:Unlike compliance-focused frameworks like NIST 800-53 or ISO 27000, which provide security controls and best practices, MITRE ATT&CK is specifically focused on the behavior of adversaries. This focus makes it an invaluable resource for understanding how attacks unfold and how to counteract them.

In this scenario, the analyst cannot conclude whether the Notable Event is a true positive or a false positive due to the absence of necessary logs and artifacts. The appropriate event disposition in this case is "Other," as it indicates that further action is required, such as ingesting the missing logs. The involvement of a security engineer to ensure the necessary data is available for proper investigation is implied, making "Other" the most suitable option.

A threat hunt is an iterative process where a hypothesis is developed and tested against data in an environment to detect the presence of threats or adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Understanding the Hypothesis:

The hypothesis here is that a threat actor might userundll32for proxy execution of malicious code and leverage Cobalt Strike for command and control (C2).

The hunt would involve looking for indicators of these specific activities in logs and artifacts like Sysmon logs, netflow, IDS alerts, and EDR data.

Search and Analysis:

The threat hunter performed an extensive search across multiple log sources and found no evidence of Cobalt Strike or the specific malicious activities hypothesized.

Evaluation of the Hypothesis:

If the hypothesis were proven true,the presence of Cobalt Strike or related artifacts would be detected.

However, the hypothesis was not proven; instead, the hunt provided strong evidence that Cobalt Strike and the hypothesized malicious activities are not present.

Successful Threat Hunt:

The goal of threat hunting is not always to find a threat but to gain confidence in the security posture of the environment.

Outcome Dcorrectly identifies that the hunt was successful because it provided strong evidence supporting the absence of the hypothesized threat, thus improving confidence in the organization's security.