SPLK-5001 Exam Dumps : Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst

The Common Information Model (CIM) in Splunk is a crucial component that allows for the normalization and standardization of data across various sources. By using CIM, disparate data sources can be mapped to a common schema, which makes it significantly easier to correlate and analyze data across different logs and systems.

Purpose of CIM:CIM provides a standardized format for fields and event types across various data sources in Splunk. This normalization allows analysts to use consistent field names and structures when performing searches, regardless of the original data source's format.

Benefit of Easier Correlation:One of the primary challenges in security operations is correlating data from different sources—like firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), endpoint security solutions, and network logs—to identify potential security incidents. CIM facilitates this by ensuring that all relevant data adheres to a common schema, enabling seamless correlation and analysis. For example, CIM allows a security analyst to write a single query that can apply to data from multiple sources, simplifying the detection of complex threats.

How it Works:CIM is implemented through data models in Splunk, which act as a blueprint for mapping and transforming raw data into a structured format. These data models cover a wide range of security domains, such as authentication, network traffic, and malware, ensuring that data from different security tools can be easily integrated and analyzed together.

Use Cases:The primary use cases for CIM include:

Search and Reporting:Creating efficient and standardized searches that apply across multiple data sources.

Dashboards and Visualizations:Building dashboards that pull in data from various sources in a consistent manner.

Correlation Searches:Developing correlation searches that detect patterns or anomalies across different types of data, enhancing threat detection.

A threat hunt is an iterative process where a hypothesis is developed and tested against data in an environment to detect the presence of threats or adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Understanding the Hypothesis:

The hypothesis here is that a threat actor might userundll32for proxy execution of malicious code and leverage Cobalt Strike for command and control (C2).

The hunt would involve looking for indicators of these specific activities in logs and artifacts like Sysmon logs, netflow, IDS alerts, and EDR data.

Search and Analysis:

The threat hunter performed an extensive search across multiple log sources and found no evidence of Cobalt Strike or the specific malicious activities hypothesized.

Evaluation of the Hypothesis:

If the hypothesis were proven true,the presence of Cobalt Strike or related artifacts would be detected.

However, the hypothesis was not proven; instead, the hunt provided strong evidence that Cobalt Strike and the hypothesized malicious activities are not present.

Successful Threat Hunt:

The goal of threat hunting is not always to find a threat but to gain confidence in the security posture of the environment.

Outcome Dcorrectly identifies that the hunt was successful because it provided strong evidence supporting the absence of the hypothesized threat, thus improving confidence in the organization's security.

This scenario is an example of aFalse Negativebecause the detection mechanisms failed to generate alerts for a brute-force attack due to a misconfiguration—specifically, the exclusion of Linux data from the detection searches. A False Negative occurs when a security control fails to detect an actual malicious activity that it is supposed to catch, leading to undetected attacks and potential breaches.