OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam Dumps : OMG Certified UML Professional 2 (OCUP 2) - Advanced Level

In UML, an InformationItem represents an abstraction of all those elements in a UML model that have an information-bearing feature. It is depicted as a classifier with the keyword «informationItem». An InformationItem does not have direct instances and serves as a mechanism to handle unspecified, untyped information in a model. In the context of a commercial transaction model, currencies such as euros, pesos, and dollars can be abstractly represented as InformationItems to signify that they are used as a form of data exchange but without specifying the concrete structure or data type. Figure 2 correctly uses InformationItem notation, with the «informationItem» keyword and the directed association pointing from the Currency InformationItem to the Euro, Peso, and Dollar, which are likely representations or manifestations of the Currency. This complies with the UML specification for representing abstract entities in models that are involved in the exchange or flow of information.

UML allows the introduction of new concepts that are not part of the standard UML metamodel by creating a profile. To add capabilities for modeling requirements and tracing relationships in UML, a profile can be created where a Class is stereotyped to represent a requirement, and a Dependency is stereotyped to represent the trace relationship. This approach is both practical and conforms to the UML standard's mechanisms for extending the language. It is a common practice to create such profiles for requirements engineering within the UML framework. This conforms to the UML 2 Superstructure Specification, which provides guidelines on creating and applying profiles and stereotypes.

The UML (Unified Modeling Language) specification, which is a part of the MOF (Meta-Object Facility) framework, suggests that the choice between creating a MOF-based metamodel and a UML profile depends on the specific needs of the domain being modeled. A MOF-based metamodel might be more appropriate for domains that require defining a completely new set of modeling concepts, whereas a UML profile is suitable for domains where the extension ofexisting UML concepts is sufficient. Since the specification recognizes the variability in modeling requirements across different domains, it emphasizes the importance of understanding the domain to make an informed decision on the modeling approach. The UML specification, therefore, does not prescribe a one-size-fits-all solution but rather leaves the decision to the modeler, based on the domain-specific requirements.