CTAL-ATT Exam Dumps : Certified Tester Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester

Given the high risk level and the need for a regression-averse strategy due to potential changes in screen design and functionality, the best test approach would involve a strong emphasis on test automation to ensure that new changes do not break existing functionality. Exploratory testing is neutral as it can be useful but is not the primary focus. Manual black-box testing is recommended to verify that the system meets the requirements from an end-user perspective.

Therefore, the option that aligns with these needs is:

Test Automation: ♦+ (highly recommended)

Exploratory Testing: o (neutral/optional)

(manual) Black-box testing: ♦♦ (recommended)

This corresponds to Option 1, which suggests a heavy reliance on automated testing to manage regression risks efficiently, while still incorporating manual black-box testing to cover user experience aspects.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and training resources emphasize the importance of test automation in Agile projects, especially when dealing with high-risk levels and the need for regression testing1. Additionally, the resources available at Software Testing Help provide insights into Agile testing strategies and best practices that support such an approach2.

 In Agile projects, test cases may need to be refactored to improve their clarity and maintainability. This process makes the test cases easier to understand and cheaper to modify, which is essential in Agile environments where changes are frequent and rapid. Refactoring test cases ensures that they remain effective and efficient as the codebase evolves, allowing for quick adjustments in response to new requirements or changes in the system under test.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents emphasize the importance of refactoring test cases in Agile projects to maintain their effectiveness and efficiency1.

Service Virtualization in Agile:Virtualized services are ideal for simulating unavailable components, enabling comprehensive testing without waiting for the actual service to be developed.

Minimizing Extra Work:Using a service virtualization tool reduces the need for manual creation and maintenance of stubs or other temporary solutions.

Analysis of Options:

A is impractical, as testers should not develop production services.

B is less efficient than service virtualization and requires ongoing setup/teardown.

C provides an efficient and reusable solution.

D risks misalignment with the new system.

Conclusion:Option C is the best approach for agile test automation progress.