CORE Exam Dumps : Supply Management Core Exam

Rejecting Supplier X's offer (Option C) is the best course of action. Once a contract has been awarded through a formal RFP process, reopening or renegotiating after the award undermines the integrity of the procurement process and can lead to legal and ethical issues. Escalating to executive management (Option A) or withdrawing the award (Option D) could disrupt established procurement protocols and fairness. Reopening the RFP (Option B) would compromise the transparency and fairness of the initial process.

References:

Ethical Guidelines in Supply Management

RFP Process Best Practices

Context: Evaluating bids for a delivery van with consideration of cost and potential buyback offers.

Cost Calculation:

Supplier J: $50,000

Supplier K: $52,500 with a $3,000 buyback.

Opportunity Cost: The present value (PV) factor for 5 years at 10% is 0.62.

Supplier K’s Net Cost: $52,500 - ($3,000 * 0.62) = $52,500 - $1,860 = $50,640

Comparison: Supplier J’s cost is $50,000, Supplier K’s effective cost is $50,640.

Lifecycle Savings: Supplier K offers a buyback, which provides future value and offsets initial higher cost.

Conclusion: Over the van's life cycle, Supplier K's offer results in cost savings considering the buyback.

References

Capital Budgeting Techniques by Brigham and Ehrhardt.

Present Value calculations and decision-making in procurement.

Positional bargaining is a negotiation strategy where each side adopts a fixed position and then negotiates to close the gap through concessions and compromise. This approach focuses on maintaining specific demands and making adjustments to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. It contrasts with interest-based bargaining, which focuses on underlying interests rather than fixed positions.

References

Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In by Roger Fisher and William Ury

Harvard Business Review articles on negotiation tactics