CORE Exam Dumps : Supply Management Core Exam

Given Data:

Unit price: $0.40

Annual usage: 80,000 units

Carrying cost: 25%

Minimum order quantity: 20,000 units

Total Purchase Cost:

Unit price multiplied by annual usage: $0.40 * 80,000 = $32,000

Additional Costs:

As the item price is fixed and includes delivery (DDP Incoterms® 2020), there are no additional duties or transportation costs.

Carrying Cost Calculation:

For the minimum order quantity, the carrying cost is not a factor because the question specifies a fixed price per unit delivered.

Conclusion: The total cost of purchasing 80,000 units per year at $0.40 each is $32,000.

References

Incoterms® 2020 by International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation by Sunil Chopra.

The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management by Alan Rushton, Phil Croucher, and Peter Baker.

Supplier B's terms of 4%/5, Net 30 are more advantageous. This means a 4% discount is available if the invoice is paid within 5 days, whereas Supplier A offers a 2% discount for payment within 15 days. Paying early (5 days) to get a 4% discount is more beneficial in terms of cost savings compared to a 2% discount for paying within 15 days. The greater discount percentage within a shorter period represents better cash flow management and cost savings.

References:

Financial Terms in Procurement

Cash Flow Management Techniques in Supply Chain

The issue of a supplier not maintaining a steady workforce indicates a failure to assess labor stability during supplier performance evaluations:

Labor stability: Evaluating the supplier’s ability to maintain a steady workforce would have highlighted potential issues affecting continuity and reliability.

Quality metrics: Important, but this issue pertains to workforce stability.

Financial stability: While crucial, it does not directly address the problem of workforce fluctuations.

Business continuity: Broadly relevant, but labor stability is a more specific indicator of the workforce issue.

Therefore, the manufacturer likely failed to examine labor stability.

References:

Supplier performance evaluation best practices.

Risk management in supply chain literature.