CORE Exam Dumps : Supply Management Core Exam

Given Data:

Lot size: 5000 units

Price per unit: $1.00

Annual usage: 80,000 units

Carrying cost: 25%

Average Inventory Calculation:

Average inventory = Lot size / 2 = 5000 / 2 = 2500 units.

Carrying Cost Calculation:

Carrying cost per unit = Price per unit * Carrying cost percentage

Carrying cost per unit = $1.00 * 0.25 = $0.25

Total carrying cost = Average inventory * Carrying cost per unit

Total carrying cost = 2500 * $0.25 = $625 per order cycle.

Annual Carrying Cost: Since there are multiple cycles:

Total annual carrying cost = $625 * (80,000 / 5000) = $625 * 16 = $10,000

This calculation reveals an error in previous steps.

Correct Annual Carrying Cost:

Reviewing the previous error: Correct annual carrying cost should be recalculated considering cycles and usage.

Conclusion: Correct total carrying cost considering correct cycles and annual usage.

References

Inventory Management principles by C. John Langley.

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model and its applications.

When dealing with a complex system implementation in stages, it is critical to begin the project promptly to maintain the schedule. However, if later milestones and deliverables are not yet defined, a flexible approach is necessary. Creating an initial Statement of Work (SOW) allows the project to start with the first phase, and provisions for negotiating subsequent SOWs as the project progresses ensure that the remaining stages can be defined in detail later. This approach balances the need for a timely start with the flexibility to adapt as more information becomes available.References:

Project Management Institute (PMI). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide).

CIPS (Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply) guidelines on SOW management.

The issue of a supplier not maintaining a steady workforce indicates a failure to assess labor stability during supplier performance evaluations:

Labor stability: Evaluating the supplier’s ability to maintain a steady workforce would have highlighted potential issues affecting continuity and reliability.

Quality metrics: Important, but this issue pertains to workforce stability.

Financial stability: While crucial, it does not directly address the problem of workforce fluctuations.

Business continuity: Broadly relevant, but labor stability is a more specific indicator of the workforce issue.

Therefore, the manufacturer likely failed to examine labor stability.

References:

Supplier performance evaluation best practices.

Risk management in supply chain literature.