CFE-Law Exam Dumps : Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) - Law

According to the ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section, under The Criminal Justice System and The Law Related to Fraud , obstruction of justice occurs when a person corruptly interferes with the administration of law or the proper functioning of the judicial process. This includes attempting to improperly influence, intimidate, or tamper with witnesses in a pending proceeding.

Offering money to witnesses in exchange for changing their testimony constitutes witness tampering, which is a classic form of obstruction of justice. The essence of obstruction is not merely the success of the interference but the corrupt attempt to impede the due administration of justice. The legal system depends on truthful testimony, and any effort to alter or influence witness statements through bribery undermines the integrity of judicial proceedings.

“Conspiracy to influence the court” is not a standard standalone criminal charge in this context, and fraudulent misrepresentation typically relates to deception for financial or property gain, not interference with judicial proceedings. Judicial extortion involves coercion under color of official authority, which does not apply here.

Therefore, Monique’s conduct—offering payment to alter testimony—would most likely result in additional charges for obstruction of justice because she is attempting to corruptly interfere with the criminal trial process.

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 7.

In the context of Individual Rights During Examinations, specifically relating to employee, the question asks about MOST LIKELY.

The correct answer is B: The existence of a collective bargaining agreement..

This question relates to individual rights during examinations. The correct answer accurately describes the legal protections, obligations, or privacy considerations that apply in workplace investigations. Fraud examiners must balance investigative needs with legal protections for individuals.

The correct answer is A. In common law systems, authentication is the process of showing that an item of evidence is what the proponent claims it is. Federal Rule of Evidence 901 states that to satisfy the authentication requirement, the party offering the evidence must produce enough proof to support a finding that the item is what that party claims. This is the core purpose of authentication.

Option B is incorrect because records, including many digital records, can often be authenticated through testimony or certification from a person with knowledge, such as a custodian of records, depending on the applicable rule and context. Option C is wrong because authentication is not something that must be “reviewed and voted on” by a jury as a prerequisite; it is an evidentiary foundation issue generally handled by the court. Option D is also incorrect because even properly authenticated evidence must still be relevant to be admissible. Authentication and relevance are separate requirements, and satisfying one does not eliminate the need for the other. For CFE purposes, the essential idea is that authentication establishes genuineness and identity, so A is the correct answer.