CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

Natural supports are methods of inclusion and assistance that exist in any given workplace, and that an employee with a disability can tap into1. These supports help the person to perform their role, and also to feel socially included, which is crucial for highperformance and job retention1. Natural supports can involve people, procedures, customs, tools, and benefits that are typically available in the workplace, along with individualized supports seen as normative within the setting1. Some examples of natural supports are mentoring, friendship, socializing, providing feedback, or reminding12.

Among the four options, only C involves a natural support that can help the 19-year-old female feel more connected and confident in the workplace. By finding a co-worker who can empathize with, mentor, and support her on the job, she can benefit from the guidance, encouragement, and friendship of someone who understands the work environment and culture. This can also help her to develop her skills, overcome her challenges, and integrate into the social network of the workplace12.

Option A is not a natural support, but a paid support that may create a barrier between the employee and her co-workers. It may also send a message that she cannot do the job without a support person, and hinder her independence and self-esteem2. Option B is also not a natural support, but a personal support that may blur the boundaries between the professional and personal relationship. It may also create a dependency onthe supervisor, and prevent the employee from seeking help from other sources3. Option D is not a workplace support, but a clinical support that may not address the specific needs and goals of the employee in relation to her work. It may also stigmatize the employee, and make her feel more isolated and anxious4.

References:

• 1: The Importance of Natural Supports - ThinkWork
• 2: The Case for Natural Supports in the Workplace
• 3: Natural Supports - Project 10
• 4: Workplace Mental Health - Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada

 According to the FLSA, individuals may volunteer their services to public agencies for civic, charitable, or humanitarian reasons, without being considered employees of the public agencies, as long as they offer their services freely and without coercion, and they do not perform the same type of services as their regular employment1. Therefore, Brad can volunteer for the blood drive, which is a charitable activity organized by a non-profit organization, without being paid by the bank, which is his private sector employer. The other options are incorrect because they either misstate or contradict the FLSA provisions regarding volunteers. There is no prohibition against employees with disabilities from volunteering in any capacity or line of work in the public sector, as long as they meet the same criteria as other volunteers1. Being paid is not required for volunteers with disabilities, unless they are employed by the same public agency that they volunteer for2. People are not allowed to volunteer their services to public agencies when they are doing work that is the same as the work in which they are employed, regardless of whether their employer is a public or private entity1. References: Fact Sheet #14A: Non-Profit Organizations and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), eCFR :: 29 CFR Part 553 Subpart B – Volunteers

 According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the knowledge areas for Domain 1: Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice is “The impact of disclosure on employment and career development”. The handbook also states that “The CESP exam is based on the application of knowledge, not just the recall of facts”. Therefore, the best answer is the one that demonstrates the most effective and ethical practice for supporting the woman in her employment and career goals.

Option A is the best answer because it respects the woman’s right to self-determination and choice, and helps her to weigh the pros and cons of disclosing her disability in different situations and contexts. This can help her to make an informed decision that is based on her own preferences, needs, and circumstances, rather than on fear or misinformation.

Option B is not the best answer because it reinforces the woman’s negative perception of disclosure, and does not provide her with any information or guidance on how to handle disclosure issues. This can limit her opportunities and choices, and prevent her from accessing any reasonable accommodations or supports that she may need or want in the workplace.

Option C is not the best answer because it does not address the woman’s specific concerns or situation, and may come across as dismissive or insensitive. While sharing success stories can be helpful and motivational, they are not sufficient or relevant to help the woman make her own decision about disclosure. Moreover, success stories may not reflect the reality or diversity of experiences that people with disabilities face in the workplace.

Option D is not the best answer because it violates the woman’s privacy and autonomy, and may have legal and ethical implications. Discussing the woman’s disability with the prospective supervisor without her consent or knowledge is not appropriate or professional, and may damage the trust and rapport between the woman and theemployment support professional. Furthermore, the woman may not be protected by the ADA if she does not request or agree to any reasonable accommodations or modifications.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook