CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

According to the Social Security Administration1, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program provides monthly payments to people who have limited income and resources, and who are either 65 or older, blind, or have a disability. The eligibility for SSI is not based on the parent’s Social Security earnings, but on the individual’s own income and resources. The parent’s earnings may affect the SSI eligibility of a child under 18, but not of an adult2. Therefore, option A does not define the SSI program.

The other options are correct definitions of the SSI program. Option B states that qualifying for SSI is based upon earned income and owned assets, which is true. The SSI program has strict limits on how much income and resources a person can have to be eligible1. Option C states that the basic SSI amount is the same nationwide, but many states add money to the basic benefit, which is also true. The federal SSI benefit rate for 2024 is $794 per month for an individual and $1,191 per month for a couple, but some states supplement this amount with their own funds3. Option D states that the program makes payments to people with low income who are age 65 or older or have a disability, which is the main purpose of the SSI program1. References: 1: Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 2: You May Be Able to Get Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 3: SSI Federal Payment Amounts For 2024

The best way for an employment support professional to assist a new hire to participate in an employer’s training is to provide supports based on needs identified by the new hire. This is because the new hire is the best source of information about their own strengths, preferences, and challenges, and the employment support professional should respect their autonomy and self-determination. Providing individualized supports can help the new hire learn the skills and knowledge required for the job, as well as build confidence and trust with the employer and co-workers. Asking the employer to provide special training, having a co-worker explain the unwritten rules, or attending the training on behalf of the new hire are not the best methods, as they may imply that the new hire is not capable of learning the same way as other employees, or that they need extra help or supervision. These methods may also create dependency, stigma, or isolation for the new hire, and may not address their specific needs or goals. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Competency 4.1: Provide individualized supports to the employee based on their needs and preferences.
• Online Learning - Association of People Supporting Employment First, Module 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Lesson 1: Individualized Supports.

The CESP certification is based on the principles of individualized, integrated, and competitive employment for people with disabilities1. One of the core values of this approach is to promote the self-determination and empowerment of the individuals being supported2. This means that the employment support professionals should respect the preferences, choices, and goals of the individuals, and help them develop the skills and confidence to achieve their desired outcomes2.

The options A, B, and C are examples of reasonable supports that align with these principles. They provide Susan with visual, auditory, or human cues that can help her remember the sequence of her tasks, without interfering with her autonomy or productivity. They also allow her to use the tools or strategies that work best for her learning style and preferences. These supports can be faded over time as Susan becomes more familiar and comfortable with her job3.

The option D, however, is an example of an unreasonable support that violates these principles. It implies that the store manager does not trust Susan to perform her tasks correctly, and that he or she needs to monitor and control her every hour. This can undermine Susan’s self-esteem, motivation, and satisfaction with her job. It can also create a negative or hostile relationship between Susan and her manager, and affect her integration and inclusion in the workplace. Moreover, it can be disruptive and inefficient for both Susan and the manager to have such frequent check-ins, especially if they interfere with their other duties or responsibilities. References: