CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 2 of the CESP certification covers Individualized Employment and Career Planning, which includes the following tasks:

• 2.1 Conduct person-centered career planning and discovery activities to identify the job seeker’s skills, interests, preferences, and support needs.
• 2.2 Assist the job seeker to develop an individualized employment plan that reflects his or her employment goals and support strategies.
• 2.3 Assist the job seeker to explore and access education and training opportunities related to his or her employment goals.

The best initial step for an employment support professional to help a job seeker who is interested in doing auto body work, but does not know much about it, is to help him visit with the auto body garage to better understand the work. This would be an example of a person-centered career planning and discovery activity, which would help the job seeker to identify his or her skills, interests, preferences, and support needs related to auto body work. It would also provide the job seeker with an opportunity to learn more about the work environment, the tasks and responsibilities, the qualifications and requirements, and the potential earnings and benefits of auto body work. This information would help the job seeker to decide if auto body work is a suitable and realistic employment goal, and to develop an individualized employment plan accordingly.

The other options are not the best initial steps, because they either assume that the job seeker has already decided on auto body work as an employment goal, or they do not provide enough information or exploration for the job seeker to make an informed decision. Helping the job seeker research the career’s potential earnings (option A) is important, but it is not enough to determine if the job seeker is interested in andcapable of doing auto body work. Helping the job seeker fill out an application at a local auto body garage (option B) is premature, because the job seeker may not meet the qualifications or requirements, or may not enjoy the work once hired. Helping the job seeker enroll in the auto body course at the local community college (option C) is also premature, because the job seeker may not have the necessary prerequisites, or may not find the course relevant or useful for his or her employment goals.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 10.

The best sustainable structured activity for this situation is to coach the material handler to build relationships with co-workers who take lunch and return to work at the same time. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, inclusion, and natural supports. By encouraging the material handler to socialize with his co-workers, he can benefit from peer modeling, accountability, and positive reinforcement. He can also feel more connected and valued at his workplace, which can increase his motivation and satisfaction. This option is also sustainable, as it does not rely on external or artificial interventions that may not be available or effective in the long term.

The other options are not as good as option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Referring to an assistive technology person to inquire if anything can help with time management is not a bad idea, but it may not be the most effective or appropriate solution for this situation. Assistive technology can be helpful for some individuals with disabilities who need specific tools or devices to perform their job tasks, but it may not address the underlying reasons why the material handler is returning late from lunch breaks. Assistive technology can also be costly, inaccessible, or incompatible with the work environment or the individual’s preferences. Therefore, this option is not the best sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option C: Having a parent, friend, or job coach call him to monitor time spent on lunch is not a good option, as it violates the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, dignity, and respect. This option implies that the material handler is not capable of managing his own time or making his own decisions, and that he needs constant supervision or reminders from others. This option can also create dependency, resentment, or embarrassment for the material handler, and can damage his relationship with his employer or co-workers. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option D: Instructing the supervisor to remind him when to return to work is also not a good option, as it does not support the core values and principles of employment support, such as empowerment, inclusion, and natural supports. This option places the responsibility andburden on the supervisor, who may not have the time, skills, or interest to do so. This option can also create conflict, tension, or mistrust between the material handler and his supervisor, and can undermine his autonomy and confidence. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 4 of the CESP certification covers Workplace and Related Supports, which includes the following tasks:

• 4.1 Conduct job analysis to identify the essential functions, skills, and supports needed for successful job performance.
• 4.2 Provide job training and coaching to facilitate skill acquisition, work performance, and retention.
• 4.3 Collaborate with the employer, the employee, and other stakeholders to develop and implement natural and ongoing supports.
• 4.4 Monitor and evaluate the employee’s work performance, satisfaction, and career development.

The best time for an employment support professional to conduct a job analysis is once the individual has accepted a position. This would be consistent with the task 4.1, which requires the employment support professional to identify the essential functions, skills, and supports needed for successful job performance. By conducting a job analysis after the individual has accepted a position, the employment support professional would be able to collect accurate and relevant data on the specific job duties, tasks, activities, and elements, as well as the work environment, tools and equipment, relationships, and requirements. This information would help the employment support professional to provide job training and coaching, collaborate with the employer and the employee, and monitor and evaluate the employee’s work performance, satisfaction, and career development.

The other options are not the best times to conduct a job analysis, because they either occur too early or too late in the employment process. Conducting a job analysis after the individual starts work (option B) is too late, because the employment support professional would miss the opportunity to provide job training and coaching, and to facilitate the employee’s adjustment and integration into the workplace. Conducting a job analysis on the day of the interview (option C) is too early, because the employment support professional would not have enough information or access to the specific job and workplace that the individual is applying for. Conducting a job analysis when the individual applies for work (option D) is also too early, because the employment support professional would not know which position the individual would be offered or accept, and would have to conduct multiple job analyses for different potential jobs.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 10.