CAMS-FCI Exam Dumps : Advanced CAMS-Financial Crimes Investigations

The actions that the investigator should recommend to mitigate risk are conducting enhanced due diligence (D) and re-evaluating the customer risk profile (E). These actions are appropriate and prudent, as they allow the investigator to obtain more information and evidence about the nature and purpose of the transactions, the source and destination of the funds, and the identity and legitimacy of the parties involved. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, “the FI should conduct enhanced due diligence on all parties involved in the investigation, including checking various sources of information, such as watch lists, sanctions lists, negative news, and official registries” (p. 24). The FI should also “re-assess the customer risk profile based on any new information obtained during the investigation, and adjust the customer due diligence and monitoring requirements accordingly” (p. 25).

The other options are not as appropriate or effective as options D and E. The investigator should not recommend exiting the relationship with the customer (A), as this could be premature or disproportionate, as well as potentially discriminatory or illegal. The investigator should not recommend documenting and maintaining a file with the investigative findings (B), as this is not an action to mitigate risk, but rather a standard procedure for any investigation. The investigator should not recommend discussing the investigation findings with the customer ©, as this could compromise the integrity and objectivity of the investigation, as well as expose the FI to legal or regulatory risks.

References: 1: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide

The threat of US sanctions against foreign individuals and entities continues to exist despite the absence of a US nexus. This is stated in the Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) manual on page 591, which states: “It is important to note that the threat of US sanctions against foreign individuals and entities continues to exist even when there is no direct US nexus (i.e., no US persons or assets involved).”

The sources of funds that Bank A should conduct additional scrutiny on are the third-party transfer and the transfer from Bank B. This is because these sources may pose higher risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, or other illicit activities. Some of the reasons why these sources require more scrutiny are23:

Third-party transfers may involve unknown or unrelated parties that may have ulterior motives or hidden agendas. They may also be used to obscure the origin or destination of funds, or to circumvent sanctions or other regulatory restrictions.

Transfers from Bank B may involve jurisdictions that have weak anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regimes, high levels of corruption, or significant criminal activity. They may also involve banks that have poor reputation, compliance, or transparency standards.

References:

• Third Party Payments - Wolfsberg Group
• Guidance on Correspondent Banking Services - FATF