Summer Special - Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: top65certs

301b Exam Dumps : LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot

PDF
301b pdf
 Real Exam Questions and Answer
 Last Update: Jul 4, 2025
 Question and Answers: 209
 Compatible with all Devices
 Printable Format
 100% Pass Guaranteed
$29.75  $84.99
301b exam
PDF + Testing Engine
301b PDF + engine
 Both PDF & Practice Software
 Last Update: Jul 4, 2025
 Question and Answers: 209
 Discount Offer
 Download Free Demo
 24/7 Customer Support
$47.25  $134.99
Testing Engine
301b Engine
 Desktop Based Application
 Last Update: Jul 4, 2025
 Question and Answers: 209
 Create Multiple Test Sets
 Questions Regularly Updated
  90 Days Free Updates
  Windows and Mac Compatible
$35  $99.99
Last Week Results
32 Customers Passed F5
301b Exam
Average Score In Real Exam
86.7%
Questions came word for word from this dump
88.6%
F5 Bundle Exams
F5 Bundle Exams
 Duration: 3 to 12 Months
 5 Certifications
  11 Exams
 F5 Updated Exams
 Most authenticate information
 Prepare within Days
 Time-Saving Study Content
 90 to 365 days Free Update
$291.2*
Free 301b Exam Dumps

Verified By IT Certified Experts

CertsTopics.com Certified Safe Files

Up-To-Date Exam Study Material

99.5% High Success Pass Rate

100% Accurate Answers

Instant Downloads

Exam Questions And Answers PDF

Try Demo Before You Buy

Certification Exams with Helpful Questions And Answers

LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot Questions and Answers

Question 1

A web application requires knowledge of the client's true IP address for logging and analysis purposes. Instances of the application that can decode X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers reside in pool_a, while pool_b instances assume the source IP is the true address of the client.

Which iRule provides the proper functionality?

Options:

A.

when HTTP_DATA {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

B.

when HTTP_RESPONSE {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

C.

when HTTP_REQUEST {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

D.

when HTTP_OPEN {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

Buy Now
Question 2

-- Exhibit –

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

A web application is configured to allow sessions to continue even after a user computer is shut down for the night. A new LTM device is configured to load balance the web application to several servers. The application owner reports that application users are logged out of the web application whenever their browser is restarted or computer is rebooted.

What is the problem?

Options:

A.

The virtual server does NOT have persistence configured.

B.

The virtual server does NOT have persistence mirroring configured.

C.

The cookie set by the LTM device does NOT have an "Expires" value.

D.

The cookie set by the server is NOT being passed to client by the LTM device.

Question 3

A failover event is recorded in the log messages:

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 01140029:5: HA proc_running tmm fails action is go offline and down links.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0050:5: Sod requests links down.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0054:5: Offline for traffic group /Common/traffic-group-1.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c003e:5: Offline

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice logger: /usr/bin/tmipsecd --tmmcount 4 ==> /usr/bin/bigstart stop racoon

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP info lacpd[5502]: 01160016:6: Failover event detected. (Switchboard failsafe disabled while offline)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP err bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0010:3: Failover event detected. Marking external interfaces down. bsx.c(3633)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP info bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0015:6: Link: 1.1 is DOWN

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143c:5: Connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 has been removed

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 port 6699

What is the cause of the failover?

Options:

A.

TMM failed, and VLAN fail-safe initiated the failover.

B.

TMM failed, and system fail-safe initiated the failover.

C.

Loss of connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 initiated the failover.

D.

A switchboard failure caused system fail-safe to initiate the failover.