Netskope NSK101 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To update a File Profile with malicious file hashes in the Netskope platform, an administrator can use the following methods:

Upload a CSV file of malicious file hashes: Administrators can prepare a CSV file containing the malicious file hashes and upload it to the platform. This method allows for bulk updates of the file profile with multiple hashes at once.

Input a list of malicious file hashes: Administrators can manually input a list of malicious file hashes directly into the platform. This method is useful for adding individual hashes or making small updates to the file profile.

These methods ensure that the file profile is updated with the latest malicious file information, enabling the platform to detect and block known threats effectively.

References:

Netskope documentation on managing File Profiles and updating them with malicious file hashes.

Instructions and best practices for uploading and managing threat intelligence data within the Netskope platform.

A tombstone file is a placeholder file that replaces the original file when it is moved to quarantine by a Netskope policy. The tombstone file contains information about the original file, such as its name, size, type, owner, and the reason why it was quarantined. The tombstone file also provides a link to the Netskope UI where the administrator or the file owner can view more details about the incident and take appropriate actions, such as restoring or deleting the file. The purpose of using a tombstone file is to preserve the metadata and location of the original file, as well as to notify the users about the quarantine action and how to access the file if needed. References: Threat Protection - Netskope Knowledge PortalNetskope threat protection - Netskope

The CCI scoring is a way to measure the security posture of cloud applications based on a set of criteria and weights. The default objective score is calculated by Netskope using industry best practices and standards. However, customers can change the CCI scoring to suit their own business needs and risk appetite. For example, a customer may want to place a higher business risk weight on vendors that claim ownership of their data, as this may affect their data sovereignty and privacy rights. Changing the CCI scoring for this reason would be valid, as it reflects the customer’s own security requirements and preferences. Changing the CCI scoring for other reasons, such as discovering a new SaaS application, punishing an application vendor, or using an application under research, would not be valid, as they do not align with the purpose and methodology of the CCI scoring. References: Netskope Security Cloud Operation & Administration (NSCO&A) - Classroom Course, Module 7: Cloud Confidence Index (CCI), Lesson 1: CCI Overview and Lesson 2: CCI Scoring.