Free and Premium Juniper JN0-636 Dumps Questions Answers

According to the Juniper documentation, reflexive NAT is a type of source NAT that allows an internal host to communicate with an external host using a single public IP address and port. The reflexive NAT session is created when the internal host initiates the traffic to the external host, and the session is deleted when the traffic stops. The reflexive NAT session is bidirectional, meaning that the external host can send traffic back to the internal host using the same public IP address and port that the internal host used to reach the external host. However, the external host cannot initiate a new session to the internal host using the same public IP address and port, unless the internal host has already established a session with the external host. Therefore, only the Internet host that the internal host originally communicated with can initiate traffic to reach the internal host using the 203.0.113.1 address, a random source port, and destination port 54311. References: [Configuring Reflexive NAT]

The two types of source NAT translations that are supported in this scenario are translation of IPv4 hosts to IPv6 hosts with or without port address translation, and translation of one IPv6 subnet to another IPv6 subnet without port address translation. These are the types of source NAT translations that are supported by the Junos OS for IPv6 NAT. Translation of IPv4 hosts to IPv6 hosts allows IPv4-only hosts to communicate with IPv6-only hosts by changing the source IPv4 address to a corresponding IPv6 address. Port address translation can be optionally enabled to conserve IPv6 addresses by using different port numbers for different sessions. Translation of one IPv6 subnet to another IPv6 subnet allows IPv6 hosts to use a different IPv6 address range for outbound traffic, such as for security or policy reasons. Port address translation is not supported for this type of translation, as IPv6 addresses are abundant and do not need to be conserved. References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

According to the output of the traceoptions file called radius, the source of the problem is that the RADIUS server IP address is unreachable. This is indicated by the line FAILURE: sendto: No route to host, which shows that the SRX device cannot send the authentication request to the RADIUS server. This could be due to a network issue, such as a misconfigured route, a firewall blocking the traffic, or a physical link failure.

To troubleshoot this issue, the user should check the following:

• The RADIUS server IP address and port are correctly configured on the SRX device. The user can verify this by using the command show configuration access radius-server1.
• The SRX device can ping the RADIUS server IP address. The user can use the command ping  to test the connectivity2.
• The SRX device has a valid route to the RADIUS server IP address. The user can use the command show route  to check the routing table3.
• The SRX device and the RADIUS server are using the same shared secret key. The user can verify this by using the command show configuration access radius-server secret1.
• The SRX device and the RADIUS server are using the same authentication protocol. The user can verify this by using the command show configuration access profile 4.
• The firewall policies on the SRX device and any intermediate devices are allowing the RADIUS traffic. The user can use the command show security policies from-zone to-zone  to check the firewall policies5.

References: 1: Configuring RADIUS Server Parameters 2: ping - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks 3: show route - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks 4: Configuring Authentication Profiles 5: show security policies - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks

The exhibit shows the output of the "show interfaces ge-0/0/5.0 extensive" command on an SRX Series device. The output includes a section called "Security" that lists the protocols that are allowed on the ge-0/0/5.0 interface. The protocols that are allowed on the ge-0/0/5.0 interface are:

• OSPF
• DHCP
• NTP

It's important to notice that the output don't have IBGP, IPsec, so these protocols are not allowed on the ge-0/0/5.0 interface.

Juniper ATP Cloud provides zero-day malware protection for non-Juniper firewalls. It's a cloud-based service that analyzes files and network traffic to detect and prevent known and unknown (zero-day) threats. It uses a combination of static and dynamic analysis techniques, as well as machine learning, to detect and block malicious files, even if they are not known to traditional anti-virus software. It also provides real-time visibility and detailed forensics for incident response and remediation.

To share threat intelligence from your environment with third party tools, you need to enable Juniper ATP Cloud to share threat intelligence and configure application tokens in the Juniper ATP Cloud to limit who has access. The other options are incorrect because:

• A. Configuring application tokens in the SRX Series firewalls is not necessary or sufficient to share threat intelligence with third party tools. Application tokens are used to authenticate and authorize requests to the Juniper ATP Cloud API, which can be used to perform various operations such as submitting files, querying C&C feeds, and managing allowlists and blocklists1. However, to share threat intelligence with third party tools, you need to enable the TAXII service in the Juniper ATP Cloud, which is a different protocol for exchanging threat information2.
• D. Enabling SRX Series firewalls to share threat intelligence with third party tools is not possible or supported. SRX Series firewalls can send potentially malicious objects and files to the Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis and receive threat intelligence from the Juniper ATP Cloud to block malicious traffic3. However, SRX Series firewalls cannot directly share threat intelligence with third party tools. You need to use the Juniper ATP Cloud as the intermediary for threat intelligence sharing.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and C. You need to enable Juniper ATP Cloud to share threat intelligence and configure application tokens in the Juniper ATP Cloud to limit who has access. To do so, you need to perform the following steps:

• Enable and configure the TAXII service in the Juniper ATP Cloud. TAXII (Trusted Automated eXchange of Indicator Information) is a protocol for communication over HTTPS of threat information between parties. STIX (Structured Threat Information eXpression) is a language used for reporting and sharing threat information using TAXII. Juniper ATP Cloud can contribute to STIX reports by sharing the threat intelligence it gathers from file scanning. Juniper ATP Cloud also uses threat information from STIX reports as well as other sources for threat prevention2. To enable and configure the TAXII service, you need to select Configure > Threat Intelligence Sharing in the Juniper ATP Cloud WebUI, move the knob to the right to Enable TAXII, and move the slidebar to designate a file sharing threshold2.
• Configure application tokens in the Juniper ATP Cloud. Application tokens are used to authenticate and authorize requests to the Juniper ATP Cloud API and the TAXII service. You can create and manage application tokens in the Juniper ATP Cloud WebUI by selecting Configure > Application Tokens. You can specify the name, description, expiration date, and permissions of each token. You can also revoke or delete tokens as needed. You can use the application tokens to limit who has access to your shared threat intelligence by granting or denying permissions to the TAXII service1.

References:

• Threat Intelligence Open API Setup Guide
• Configure Threat Intelligence Sharing
• About Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Cloud

The flow-session resource is needed in order to ensure adequate and secure communication between the two logical systems.

• The flow-session resource must be defined in the security profile for the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system is responsible for forwarding traffic between other logical systems. The flow-session resource determines the maximum number of sessions that the interconnect logical system can create and maintain. If the flow-session resource is not allocated or is insufficient, the interconnect logical system might drop packets or fail to establish sessions1.
• The NAT resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system does not perform any NAT operations on the traffic. The NAT resources are only relevant for the logical systems that need to translate the source or destination IP addresses or ports of the traffic1.
• No resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system is incorrect because the interconnect logical system still requires some resources to function properly, such as the flow-session resource. The interconnect logical system cannot operate without any resources allocated to it1.
• The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic that will flow between the logical systems is partially correct, but not the best answer. The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic and the type of traffic that will flow between the logical systems. For example, the flow-session resource depends on the number and duration of sessions, the security-log-stream-number resource depends on the number and size of logs, and the NAT resource depends on the number and type of NAT rules1.

References:

• Security Profiles for Logical Systems | Junos OS | Juniper Networks

The exhibit shows the output of the show security intelligence category summary command on the SRX-1 device. This command displays the status of the security intelligence categories configured on the device. In the output, we can see that there are two categories configured - Proxy_Nodes and Proxy_Node3. The Proxy_Nodes category is a custom category that is created by the SRX-1 device using the adaptive threat profiling feature. The Proxy_Node3 category is a third-party category that is downloaded from the Juniper ATP Cloud service. The Proxy_Nodes category contains the IP addresses that match the security policy named Proxy-ATP on the SRX-1 device. The Proxy_Node3 category contains the IP addresses that are associated with the Tor network.

The two statements that are true based on the exhibit are:

• The SRX-1 device creates the Proxy_Nodes feed, so it cannot use it in another security policy. This is because the adaptive threat profiling feature does not allow the device that creates the feed to use it in another security policy. The feed is intended to be shared with other devices in the same realm through the Juniper ATP Cloud service. The SRX-1 device can only use the feeds that are created by other devices or downloaded from third-party sources.
• You can only use the Proxy_Node3 feed as the destination-address match criteria of another security policy on a different SRX Series device. This is because the Proxy_Node3 feed is a third-party feed that is downloaded from the Juniper ATP Cloud service. The SRX-1 device can use this feed as a dynamic address object in its security policies. However, the feed is configured with the destination-only option, which means that it can only be used as the destination-address match criteria of a security policy. The source-address match criteria of a security policy cannot use this feed.

References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

• To solve the problem of using the same IPv4 address space as your company, you can identify two neutral IPv4 address spaces for address translation. This will allow you to use the same IPv4 address space as your company without any conflicts. Additionally, you can configure static NAT on the SRX Series devices to ensure that the traffic is properly routed between the two networks.
• Static NAT is a type of network address translation that maps a private IP address to a public IP address on a one-to-one basis. Static NAT is useful when you need to expose a server or device with a private IP address to the Internet or another network with a different IP address range. Static NAT also preserves the original source or destination IP address in the packet header, which can be useful for logging or auditing purposes1.
• Neutral IPv4 address spaces are IP address ranges that are not assigned to any specific organization or entity. They are usually reserved for special purposes, such as private networks, multicast, loopback, or documentation. Neutral IPv4 address spaces can be used for address translation when there is an overlap or conflict between two networks that need to communicate with each other. For example, you can use the 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, or 192.168.0.0/16 address ranges, which are designated for private use, as neutral IPv4 address spaces for address translation2.

References:

• SRX Getting Started - Configure VPN tunnel for site-to-site connectivity
• SRX & J Series Site-to-Site VPN Configurator
• Resolution Guide – SRX - Troubleshoot Static NAT
• RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets

The appropriate mitigation actions for the selected incident are to block malware IP addresses (download server or CnC server) and to deploy IVP integration (if configured) to confirm if the endpoint has executed the malware and is infected. This is because the incident shows a progression level of “Download” in the kill chain, which means that the malware has been downloaded and is likely to be executed. Blocking the malware IP addresses can prevent further communication with the malicious server and stop the malware from receiving commands or exfiltrating data. Deploying IVP integration can help verify the infection status of the endpoint and provide additional information about the malware behavior and impact. IVP integration is an optional feature that allows the ATP Appliance to interact with third-party endpoint security solutions such as Carbon Black, Cylance, and CrowdStrike. References:

• Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Solution Brief
• Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Datasheet
• [Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Mitigation Actions]
• [Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance IVP Integration]

w.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos-space18.1/policy-enforcer/topics/task/configuration/junos-space-policyenforcer-custom-feeds-infected-host-configure.html

The exhibit shows the configuration of filter-based forwarding on an SRX Series device. Filter-based forwarding is a feature that allows the device to use firewall filters to direct traffic to different routing instances based on the match criteria. In this scenario, the device has two routing instances - ISP-1 and ISP-2 - and two firewall filters - FBF and FBF-ISP-1. The FBF filter is applied to the ge-0/0/1 interface as an input filter. The FBF filter has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The ISP-1 routing instance has a static route to the next hop 172.20.0.2. The FBF-ISP-1 filter is applied to the ge-0/0/0 interface as an output filter. The FBF-ISP-1 filter has one term that matches the traffic to the 172.20.0.2 next hop and sets the forwarding class to expedited-forwarding.

The problem in this scenario is that the traffic from the other network (172.25.1.0/24) is not being forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor. This is because the FBF filter does not have a term that accepts the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. The FBF filter only has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network does not match this term and is therefore discarded by the implicit deny action at the end of the filter. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network should be forwarded to the ISP-2 routing instance, which has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2.

To solve this problem, you must add another term to the FBF filter to accept the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. This term should have the action accept, which means that the traffic will be forwarded according to the routing table of the master routing instance. The master routing instance has a static default route to the ISP-2 routing instance, which in turn has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2. By adding this term, the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network will be forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor as expected.

The configuration of the new term in the FBF filter could look something like this:

[edit firewall family inet filter FBF] term 2 { from { source-address { 172.25.1.0/24; } } then { accept; } }

References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

In IPsec CoS-based VPNs, the number of IPsec Security Associations (SAs) associated with a peer is based on the number of forwarding classes configured for the VPN. The forwarding classes are used to classify and prioritize different types of traffic, such as voice and data traffic. Each forwarding class requires a separate IPsec SA to be established between the peers, in order to provide the appropriate level of security and quality of service for each type of traffic.

ofile-logical-system.html

The suspicious_Endpoints feed is a dynamic address group that is created by Juniper ATP Cloud based on the IoT device discovery and policy enforcement feature. This feature allows the SRX Series device to send IoT traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis and classification. Juniper ATP Cloud then creates a threat feed that contains the IP addresses of the suspicious IoT devices and sends it back to the SRX Series device. The SRX Series device can then use this feed to create and enforce security policies for the IoT traffic. The suspicious_Endpoints feed is usable by any SRX Series device that is a part of the same realm as SRX-1, because the feed is shared among the devices that belong to the same Juniper ATP Cloud realm. Juniper ATP Cloud automatically creates the suspicious_Endpoints feed after you commit the security policy that references the feed, because the feed is dynamically generated based on the IoT traffic analysis. You do not need to manually create the feed in the Juniper ATP Cloud interface. References:

• Example- Configure IoT Device Discovery and Policy Enforcement
• Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention Cloud Policy Overview

In Juniper ATP Cloud, a threat prevention policy allows you to define how the system should handle an infected host. Two of the available actions are:

• Close the connection: This action will close the connection between the infected host and the destination to which it is trying to connect. This will prevent the host from communicating with the destination and will stop any malicious activity.
• Quarantine the host: This action will isolate the infected host from the network by placing it in a quarantine VLAN. This will prevent the host from communicating with other devices on the network, which will prevent it from spreading malware or exfiltrating data.

Sending a custom message is used to notify the user and administrator of the action taken. Drop the connection silently is not an action available in Juniper ATP Cloud.

According to the Juniper documentation, the threat prevention policy in Juniper ATP Cloud is a configuration that defines the actions and notifications for different threat levels of the traffic. The threat levels are based on the verdicts returned by Juniper ATP Cloud after analyzing the files, URLs, and domains. The threat levels range from 1 to 10, where 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest1.

The threat prevention policy allows the user to specify different actions for different threat levels. The actions can be applied to the traffic or to the infected host. The actions available for the traffic are:

• Permit: Allows the traffic to pass through the SRX Series device without any interruption.
• Block: Blocks the traffic and sends a reset packet to the client and the server.
• Drop: Drops the traffic silently without sending any reset packet.
• Redirect: Redirects the traffic to a specified URL, such as a warning page or a sinkhole server.

The actions available for the infected host are:

• None: Does not take any action on the infected host.
• Quarantine: Quarantines the infected host by applying a firewall filter that blocks all outbound traffic from the host, except for the traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud or the specified redirect URL.
• Custom: Executes a custom script on the SRX Series device to perform a user-defined action on the infected host, such as sending an email notification or triggering an external system.

Therefore, the two different actions available in a threat prevention policy to deal with an infected host are:

• Block: This action will block the traffic from or to the infected host and send a reset packet to the client and the server. This will prevent the infected host from communicating with the malicious server or spreading the malware to other hosts.
• Quarantine: This action will quarantine the infected host by blocking all outbound traffic from the host, except for the traffic to Juniper ATP Cloud or the redirect URL. This will isolate the infected host from the network and allow the user to remediate the infection.

The following actions are not available or incorrect:

• Send a custom message: This is not an action available in the threat prevention policy. However, the user can use the custom action to execute a script that can send a custom message to the infected host or the administrator.
• Drop the connection silently: This is an action available for the traffic, not for the infected host. It will drop the traffic without sending any reset packet, which may not be effective in stopping the infection or notifying the user.

References: 1: Configuring Threat Prevention Policies

Certificate RenewalThe renewal of certificates is much the same as initial certificate enrollment except you are just replacing an old certificate(about to expire) on the VPN device with a new certificate. As with the initial certificate request, only manual renewal issupported. SCEP can be used to re-enroll local certificates automatically before they expire. Refer to Appendix D for moredetails.

• The SRX Series device is performing both source and destination NAT on this session because the traceoptions output shows that both source and destination IP addresses and ports are translated. The source IP address 192.168.5.2 is translated to 192.168.100.1 and the destination IP address 1.1.1.1 is translated to 192.168.5.1. The source port 0 is translated to 14777 and the destination port 80 is translated to 80. The traceoptions output also shows the rule and pool IDs for both source and destination NAT: 2/32770 and 1/1 respectively.
• This is the first packet in the session because the traceoptions output shows the flag flow_first_packet, which indicates that this is the first packet of a new session. The traceoptions output also shows the flag flow_first_src_xlate and flow_first_rule_dst_xlate, which indicate that this is the first time that source and destination NAT are applied to this session.

References:

• traceoptions (Security NAT) | Junos OS | Juniper Networks
• [SRX] How to interpret Flow TraceOptions output for NAT troubleshooting

According to the Juniper documentation, the infected host score is a global setting that determines the minimum threat level required for a host to be considered infected and blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. The infected host score can be configured from 1 to 10, where 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest. The default infected host score is 5, which means that any host with a threat level of 5 or higher will be automatically blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. However, the infected host score can be changed to a higher value, such as 6 or 7, to reduce the number of false positives and allow more traffic to pass through. In the exhibit, the host has a threat level of 5, which indicates that it is infected with malware and has attempted to contact command-and-control servers. However, some of the events have not been automatically mitigated, which means that the host has not been blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. A possible reason for this behavior is that the infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5, such as 6 or 7, which means that the host does not meet the minimum threshold for blocking. Therefore, the correct answer is C. The infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5. References: [Configuring the Infected Host Score] 1, [Compromised Hosts: More Information] 2

1: 2:

• When enrolling your devices, you only need to enroll one node: The Juniper ATP Cloud automatically recognizes the HA configuration and applies the same license and configuration to both nodes of the cluster.
• You must use the same license key on both cluster nodes: The HA cluster needs to share the same license key in order to be recognized as a single device by the Juniper ATP Cloud.

You must set up your HA cluster before enrolling your devices with Juniper ATP Cloud. And it is not necessary to use different license keys on both cluster nodes because the HA cluster shares the same license key.

The two statements that are correct in this scenario are:

• When enrolling your devices, you only need to enroll one node. This is because the Juniper ATP Cloud service supports chassis cluster mode for SRX Series devices. When you enroll a chassis cluster, you only need to enroll the primary node of the cluster. The secondary node will be automatically enrolled and synchronized with the primary node. You do not need to enroll the secondary node separately or perform any additional configuration on it.
• You must use the same license key on both cluster nodes. This is because the Juniper ATP Cloud service requires a license key to activate the service on the SRX Series devices. The license key is tied to the serial number of the device. When you enroll a chassis cluster, you must use the same license key on both nodes of the cluster. The license key must match the serial number of the primary node of the cluster. You cannot use different license keys on the cluster nodes.

References: Juniper Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) Reference Materials source and documents:

According to the security flow trace shown in the exhibit, which is a snippet of a packet capture on an SRX Series device, the two statements that are correct are:

• This packet arrived on interface ge-0/0/4.0. This is indicated by the line In: 10.0.1.129/22 -> 10.0.1.129/3382;1,0x0, which shows that the ingress interface of the packet is ge-0/0/4.0, as the interface name is prefixed to the source and destination IP addresses and ports of the packet1.
• An existing session is found in the table. This is indicated by the line Found: session id 0x12. sess tok 28685, which shows that the packet matches an existing session in the session table with the session ID 0x12 and the session token 286852.

The following statements are incorrect or not supported by the output:

• Destination NAT occurs. This is not supported by the output, as there is no indication of destination NAT being applied to the packet. The destination IP address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, which is the same as the destination IP address of the original packet. If destination NAT was applied, the destination IP address of the packet would be different from the destination IP address of the original packet.
• The capture is a packet from the source address 172.20.101.10 destined to 10.0.1.129. This is false, as the output shows that the source address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, not 172.20.101.10. The source IP address of the packet is prefixed to the ingress interface name ge-0/0/4.0.

References: 1: Understanding Security Flow Trace 2: show security flow session - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks

&id=TN326&cat=&actp=LIST&showDraft=false

According to the Juniper documentation, the best VPN type for connecting two remote sites to the corporate headquarters site while ensuring that all traffic is secured and sent directly between sites is IPsec ADVPN. ADVPN stands for Auto Discovery VPN, which is a feature that allows the SRX Series devices to dynamically establish IPsec tunnels between remote sites without requiring a full mesh configuration1. IPsec ADVPN uses NHRP (Next Hop Resolution Protocol) to discover the optimal path between two remote sites and create a shortcut tunnel that bypasses the hub device2. This reduces the latency and bandwidth consumption of the traffic and improves the performance and scalability of the VPN.

To configure IPsec ADVPN on the SRX Series devices, the following steps are required:

• Configure the hub device as an NHRP server and assign it a unique NHRP network ID and a public IP address3.
• Configure the spoke devices as NHRP clients and register them with the hub device using the same NHRP network ID and the hub’s public IP address3.
• Configure the IPsec VPN parameters on the hub and spoke devices, such as the IKE and IPsec proposals, policies, and gateways4.
• Configure the routing protocols on the hub and spoke devices, such as OSPF or BGP, to advertise the routes between the sites.

Once the IPsec ADVPN is configured, the hub and spoke devices will establish IPsec tunnels with each other and exchange NHRP information. When a spoke device needs to send traffic to another spoke device, it will send an NHRP resolution request to the hub device, which will reply with the public IP address of the destination spoke device. The source spoke device will then initiate a shortcut IPsec tunnel with the destination spoke device and send the traffic directly to it2.

The following VPN types are not suitable for this scenario:

• Hub-and-spoke IPsec VPN: This type of VPN requires that all traffic between the remote sites go through the hub device, which adds latency and consumes bandwidth. It also does not scale well as the number of remote sites increases.
• Layer 2 VPN: This type of VPN allows the remote sites to extend their Layer 2 networks over a Layer 3 network, such as the internet. It is typically used for data center interconnection or service provider networks. However, it does not provide any security or encryption for the traffic, and it may not be compatible with the existing network infrastructure.
• Full mesh Layer 3 VPN with EBGP: This type of VPN allows the remote sites to exchange Layer 3 routing information over a Layer 3 network, such as the internet, using EBGP (External Border Gateway Protocol). It is typically used for enterprise networks or service provider networks. However, it requires that each remote site has a unique AS (Autonomous System) number and a public IP address, and that each remote site establishes a BGP session with every other remote site. This can be complex and cumbersome to configure and maintain, and it may not provide any security or encryption for the traffic.

References: 1: Auto Discovery VPN Overview 2: Understanding Auto Discovery VPN 3: Configuring NHRP on the Hub and Spoke Devices 4: Configuring IPsec VPN on the Hub and Spoke Devices : [Configuring Routing Protocols on the Hub and Spoke Devices] : [Hub-and-Spoke VPNs Overview] : [Layer 2 VPNs Feature Guide for Security Devices] : [Layer 3 VPNs Feature Guide for Security Devices]

Proxy ARP is a technique used by routers to answer ARP requests on one network segment on behalf of hosts on another network segment. This is useful in situations where a host on one network segment needs to communicate with a host on another network segment, but the two hosts are not directly connected. In this case, the router acts as a proxy, answering ARP requests on behalf of the other host. In the exhibit, the vSRX device is configured to use a pool of addresses that are in the same subnet as the external interface ge-0/0/0 for source NAT. This means that the vSRX device will translate the source IP address of the internal hosts to one of the addresses in the pool before sending the packets to the external network. However, the external hosts will not know how to reach the NATed addresses, since they are not directly connected to the vSRX device. They will send ARP requests for the NATed addresses, expecting to receive a MAC address from the vSRX device. If proxy ARP is not enabled on the vSRX device, it will not respond to these ARP requests, since it does not have the NATed addresses configured on its interface. The ARP requests will time out and the packets will be dropped by the external hosts or the service provider router. To solve this problem, proxy ARP must be enabled on the vSRX device for the NATed addresses. This will allow the vSRX device to respond to the ARP requests from the external hosts, providing its own MAC address as the destination. The external hosts will then send the packets to the vSRX device, which will reverse the NAT and forward the packets to the internal hosts. References:

• Configuring Proxy ARP (CLI Procedure)
• [SRX] When and how to configure Proxy ARP (https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/SRX-Dynamic-VPN-scenario-for-configuring-Proxy-ARP-on-SRX?language=en_US)

According to the Juniper documentation, the steps to detect domain generation algorithms (DGA) on an SRX Series firewall are as follows:

• Define a security-metadata-streaming policy under [edit services]. A security-metadata-streaming policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to collect and stream security metadata, such as DNS queries and responses, to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis. Juniper ATP Cloud uses machine learning models and known pre-computed DGA domain names to provide domain verdicts, which helps in-line blocking and sinkholing of DNS queries on SRX Series firewalls1. You can define a security-metadata-streaming policy by using the following command:

set services security-metadata-streaming policy

• Attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone. A security zone is a logical grouping of interfaces that have similar security requirements. You can attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone by using the following command:

set security zones security-zone services security-metadata-streaming policy

The following steps are not required or incorrect:

• Define an advanced-anti-malware policy under [edit services]. An advanced-anti-malware policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to scan files for malware using Juniper ATP Cloud. It is not related to DGA detection2.
• Attach the advanced-anti-malware policy to a security policy. A security policy is a configuration that defines the rules for permitting or denying traffic between security zones. It is not related to DGA detection3.

References: 1: Configuring Security Metadata Streaming 2: Configuring Advanced Anti-Malware Policies 3: Configuring Security Policies

To troubleshoot the traffic problem using the match criteria, you need to use the show security match-policies CLI command. The other options are incorrect because:

• A. The show security policy-report CLI command displays the policy report, which is a summary of the policy usage statistics, such as the number of sessions, bytes, and packets that match each policy. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy1.
• B. The show security application-tracking counters CLI command displays the application tracking counters, which are the statistics of the application usage, such as the number of sessions, bytes, and packets that match each application. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy2.
• D. The request security policies check CLI command checks the validity and consistency of the security policies, such as the syntax, the references, and the conflicts. It does not show the match criteria or the reason why the traffic is not hitting the policy3.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. You need to use the show security match-policies CLI command to troubleshoot the traffic problem using the match criteria. The show security match-policies CLI command displays the policies that match the specified criteria, such as the source and destination addresses, the zones, the protocols, and the ports. It also shows the action and the hit count of each matching policy. You can use this command to verify if the traffic is matching the expected policy or not, and if not, what policy is blocking or rejecting the traffic4

The following statements are true regarding tenant systems on SRX Series devices:

• Each tenant system runs its own instance of the routing protocol process. Each tenant system is isolated, and it has its own routing table, interfaces, and security policies.
• A maximum of 500 tenant systems can be configured on a physical SRX device. This allows for a high degree of flexibility and scalability, as each tenant system can be configured with its own set of features and security policies.

A maximum of 32 tenant systems can be configured on a physical SRX device and All tenant systems share a single routing protocol process are not correct statements

To provide single sign-on (SSO) to Juniper ATP Cloud, you need to configure the following:

• Microsoft Azure as the identity provider (IdP): This allows users to authenticate to Juniper ATP Cloud using their Azure credentials.
• Juniper ATP Cloud as the service provider (SP): This allows Juniper ATP Cloud to accept the authentication from Microsoft Azure and provide SSO access to the users.

Configuring Microsoft Azure as the service provider (SP) and Juniper ATP Cloud as the identity provider (IdP) are not the correct steps to provide SSO, as the roles are reversed.

According to the Juniper documentation, filter-based forwarding (FBF) is a technique that allows the SRX Series device to forward packets based on firewall filter rules, rather than the default routing table1. FBF can be used to implement policy-based routing, load balancing, or traffic engineering2. To deploy FBF on the SRX Series device for incoming traffic sourced from the 10.10.100.0/24 network, the following steps are required:

• You must create a forwarding-type routing instance. A forwarding-type routing instance is a special type of routing instance that is used for FBF. It does not have any interfaces or routing protocols associated with it, but it has its own routing table that can be populated by static routes, RIB groups, or routing policies3. You can create a forwarding-type routing instance by using the following command:

set routing-instances instance-type forwarding

• You must create and apply a firewall filter that matches on the source address 10.10.100.0/24 and then sends this traffic to your routing instance. A firewall filter is a set of rules that can match on various packet attributes, such as source and destination addresses, ports, protocols, and so on. You can use the then routing-instance action to specify the routing instance that the packet should be forwarded to4. You can create and apply a firewall filter by using the following commands:

set firewall family inet filter term from source-address 10.10.100.0/24 set firewall family inet filter term then routing-instance  set interfaces unit family inet filter input

• You must create a RIB group that adds interface routes to your routing instance. A RIB group is a mechanism that allows you to import routes from one routing table to another. You can use a RIB group to add the interface routes of the ingress interface to the routing table of the forwarding-type routing instance. This will ensure that the SRX device can forward the packets to the correct next hop based on the destination address5. You can create a RIB group by using the following commands:

set routing-options rib-groups import-rib inet.0 set routing-options rib-groups import-rib .inet.0 set routing-instances routing-options instance-import

The following steps are not required or incorrect:

• You do not need to create a VRF-type routing instance. A VRF-type routing instance is a type of routing instance that is used for virtual routing and forwarding. It allows you to create multiple logical routers on the same physical device, each with its own interfaces, routing protocols, and routing tables. VRF-type routing instances are typically used for VPNs, MPLS, or network segmentation. However, they are not necessary for FBF, which can be achieved with a forwarding-type routing instance.
• You do not need to create and apply a firewall filter that matches on the destination address 10.10.100.0/24 and then sends this traffic to your routing instance. This would be redundant and unnecessary, as the destination address of the incoming traffic is already determined by the routing table of the forwarding-type routing instance. Moreover, this would create a loop, as the traffic would be sent back to the same routing instance that it came from.

References: 1: Filter-Based Forwarding Overview 2: Configuring Filter-Based Forwarding 3: forwarding (Routing Instances) 4: routing-instance (Firewall Filter Action) 5: Configuring RIB Groups : [vrf (Routing Instances)]

According to the output of the command show configuration services security-intelligence url, the SRX Series device is directly enrolled with Juniper ATP Cloud. This is indicated by the URL  , which is the default URL for Juniper ATP Cloud1. This means that the device is not enrolled with Policy Enforcer, which would use a different URL that includes the IP address of the Policy Enforcer server2. Therefore, the problem in this scenario is that the device is directly enrolled with Juniper ATP Cloud, which prevents it from being enrolled with Policy Enforcer.

To enroll the device with Policy Enforcer, the user needs to disenroll the device from Juniper ATP Cloud first. This can be done by using the following command:

delete services security-intelligence url

This command will remove the Juniper ATP Cloud URL from the device configuration and stop the device from receiving threat feeds from Juniper ATP Cloud1. After that, the user can enroll the device with Policy Enforcer by using the Security Director GUI or the SLAX script2.

References: 1: Configuring Juniper ATP Cloud on SRX Series Devices 2: Enrolling SRX Series Devices with Policy Enforcer