Juniper JN0-636 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The appropriate mitigation actions for the selected incident are to block malware IP addresses (download server or CnC server) and to deploy IVP integration (if configured) to confirm if the endpoint has executed the malware and is infected. This is because the incident shows a progression level of “Download” in the kill chain, which means that the malware has been downloaded and is likely to be executed. Blocking the malware IP addresses can prevent further communication with the malicious server and stop the malware from receiving commands or exfiltrating data. Deploying IVP integration can help verify the infection status of the endpoint and provide additional information about the malware behavior and impact. IVP integration is an optional feature that allows the ATP Appliance to interact with third-party endpoint security solutions such as Carbon Black, Cylance, and CrowdStrike. References:

• Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Solution Brief
• Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Datasheet
• [Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance Mitigation Actions]
• [Advanced Threat Prevention Appliance IVP Integration]

According to the security flow trace shown in the exhibit, which is a snippet of a packet capture on an SRX Series device, the two statements that are correct are:

• This packet arrived on interface ge-0/0/4.0. This is indicated by the line In: 10.0.1.129/22 -> 10.0.1.129/3382;1,0x0, which shows that the ingress interface of the packet is ge-0/0/4.0, as the interface name is prefixed to the source and destination IP addresses and ports of the packet1.
• An existing session is found in the table. This is indicated by the line Found: session id 0x12. sess tok 28685, which shows that the packet matches an existing session in the session table with the session ID 0x12 and the session token 286852.

The following statements are incorrect or not supported by the output:

• Destination NAT occurs. This is not supported by the output, as there is no indication of destination NAT being applied to the packet. The destination IP address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, which is the same as the destination IP address of the original packet. If destination NAT was applied, the destination IP address of the packet would be different from the destination IP address of the original packet.
• The capture is a packet from the source address 172.20.101.10 destined to 10.0.1.129. This is false, as the output shows that the source address of the packet is 10.0.1.129, not 172.20.101.10. The source IP address of the packet is prefixed to the ingress interface name ge-0/0/4.0.

References: 1: Understanding Security Flow Trace 2: show security flow session - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks