Free and Premium iSQI TMMi-P_Syll2020 Dumps Questions Answers

This statement isFALSEbecause TMMi doesnotfocus only on higher test levels like system and acceptance testing. In fact, TMMi coversall test levels, including lower levels like unit and integration testing, as well as static testing (e.g., reviews and inspections).

TMMi is designed to address testing at all levels of the software lifecycle and goes beyond dynamic testing (e.g., system and acceptance) to include static testing techniques as well. The model is comprehensive and is intended to support testing in bothsystems and software engineering. Furthermore, TMMi addresses the fourcornerstonesof structured testing:lifecycle,techniques,infrastructure, andorganization. These are essential to ensure a thorough and structured approach to improving test processes and aligning them with business goals.

TMMi References:

TMMi documentation clearly indicates that it coversall test levelsincluding static testing (such as peer reviews) and dynamic testing across different stages of development​​.

It is lifecycle-independent and can support different models, such as Agile, DevOps, and traditional V-models​.

Agile organisations often focus on rapid iterations and minimal documentation, which can lead to the omission or underuse of structured testing practices.TMMiserves as a valuable guide for Agile teams by highlightingcritical testing practicesthat might be overlooked, ensuring that essential quality processes such as risk analysis, peer reviews, and test planning are not neglected​​​.

This reminder ensures that teams maintain a disciplined approach to testing while still benefiting from Agile flexibility.

ISO/IEC 15504, which is known for its process assessment model, was not one of the sources used during the development of the TMMi model. The TMMi model was developed using inputs from sources such as the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), international testing standards (like those from ISO and IEEE), and industry testing best practices surveys. While the ISO/IEC 15504 model has relevance to general process assessments, it was not specifically referenced in the creation of the TMMi.

To improve the management and control of test environments, one of the specific practices under SG 3 (Manage and Control Test Environments) of the Test Environment process area is to coordinate the availability and usage of test environments. This involves managing reservations, scheduling, and ensuring the efficient use of test environments across different projects. This practice is essential for ensuring that the test environments are available when needed, reducing delays, and improving the overall efficiency of the testing process.

This statement is false because the CMMI does not have defined levels specifically for testing maturity. The CMMI model is more general and focuseson overall process improvement across various disciplines, including but not limited to testing. CMMI includes practices like verification and validation but does not specifically address a structured path to testing maturity, unlike TMMi, which defines specific levels for testing process maturity. Therefore, statement D is incorrect.

With a 40% achievement in the Test Planning process area, the rating would be "Partly achieved." According to TMMi, a process area is rated "Partly achieved" when the percentage of achievement is between 15% and 50%. This indicates that some practices have been implemented, but significant improvement is still required to meet the full requirements of the process area.

Peer ReviewsisNOTaTMMi Level 2process area. Peer Reviews is a process area atTMMi Level 3. At Level 3, organizations formalize their testing processes, including peer reviews, which involve static testing activities like inspections and walkthroughs to identify defects early.

Test Policy and Strategy,Test Monitoring and Control, andTest Environmentare all process areas atTMMi Level 2.

TMMi References:

Peer Reviews are introduced atTMMi Level 3, whereasTest Policy and Strategy,Test Monitoring and Control, andTest Environmentare process areas at Level 2​​.

The specific goal during the implementation of the "Test Planning" process area at TMMi Level 2 is to establish well-founded plans for managing and performing the testing activities. One of the crucial objectives is to"Establish a Master Test Plan"at TMMi Level 3, particularly under the "Test Lifecycle and Integration" process area. This is designed to ensure that a coherent, high-level plan integrates the activities across all levels of testing.

The process includes defining a test approach based on identified risks and involves the creation of the test estimates, schedules, and plans. Test plans should align with organisational strategies and cover test activities for all relevant phases of the development cycle​​.

Regularcode reviewsandarchitectural reviewsare part of theAdvanced Reviewsprocess area, which belongs toTMMi Level 4. This process area emphasizes conducting static reviews (e.g., code and design reviews) early in the lifecycle to measure product quality and adjust the testing strategy based on the insights gained from these reviews.

TMMi References:

TheAdvanced Reviewsprocess area in TMMi Level 4 aims to ensure that static testing activities such as code and architectural reviews are used to measure product quality early in the lifecycle​​.

A. Required component (II): Must be achieved. These are specific and generic goals that are mandatory for reaching a particular maturity level.

B. Expected component (III): Will typically be implemented. Expected components include specific and generic practices, which provide guidance on how to achieve required goals.

C. Informative component (I): Supports the understanding. Informative components provide details that help organisations understand and implement the required and expected components effectively, such as sub-practices and example work products.

The statement thatall defects should be analyzedto prevent as many defects as possible isFALSE. In theDefect Preventionprocess area atTMMi Level 5, only asubset of defects—those that are recurring or considered to be of significant impact—are analyzed. Analyzing all defects would be inefficient and not always necessary. Instead, a targeted approach is used to identifycommon causesof defects and implement actions to prevent their recurrence.

TMMi References:

TheDefect Preventionprocess area is based on the analysis of a subset of defects to find and eliminate common causes​​.

Both Test Organization and Test Training Program are process areas associated with TMMi Level 3 (Defined). At this level, the organisation establishes a formal test organisation and ensures that there is a dedicated test training program. This helps to institutionalise testing as a profession and ensures the systematic development of skills needed for testing activities across the organisation.

During theDiagnosing phaseof a test improvement cycle, in addition to conducting an assessment to determine the current maturity status, the activity of developing recommendations is also performed. These recommendations provide guidance on what actions should be taken to achieve the desired improvements. The assessment helps establish the organisation's current state, and the recommendations serve as a roadmap for moving forward.

TheDiagnosing phasein the IDEAL test improvement cycle is focused on understanding the current state of the organization's testing processes and identifying the areas for improvement. One of the key activities during this phase isDevelop Recommendations, which involves analysing the current process against the goals and proposing areas where improvements can be made to achieve the desired state. Other activities in this phase include characterizing the current and desired states .

At TMMi Level 3,Test Lifecycle and Integrationbuilds on the practices ofTest Planningintroduced at TMMi Level 2. This process area focuses on establishing a standardised test lifecycle, integrating the test process with the development lifecycle, and coordinating the testing effort across multiple levels. It also includes creating amaster test planthat builds upon the risk assessments, test estimates, and approaches defined at Level 2 during Test Planning.

By further refining these practices and introducing lifecycle integration,Test Lifecycle and Integrationensures that the testing processes are consistent, well-defined, and fully embedded into the overall project lifecycle​​.

In the TMMi framework, aSpecific Goalis unique to a particular process area and represents the essential outcomes that must be achieved for that process area. In contrast, aGeneric Goalapplies across multiple process areas and ensures that the processes are institutionalised, managed, and aligned with broader organisational objectives. Generic Goals help maintain consistency and effectiveness of processes across the organisation, while Specific Goals focus on the particular needs of an individual process area.

Advanced Reviewsis aTMMi Level 4process area. AtTMMi Level 4 (Measured), organizations focus on making testing aquantifiable process, using metrics and measurements to evaluate and improve product quality and the testing process.Advanced Reviewsinvolve more structured andformalized review processes that are integrated with the dynamic testing approach to measure and improve product quality earlier in the lifecycle.

TheTest Policy and Strategyis part ofLevel 2.

Defect Preventionis part ofLevel 5.

Test Lifecycle and Integrationis part ofLevel 3.

TMMi References:

TMMi definesAdvanced Reviewsas a Level 4 process area aimed at improving product quality through more rigorous and measurable review processes​​.

When implementing theTest Policy and Strategyprocess area in TMMi, one of the specific goals you would be targeting is toEstablish Test Performance Indicators. These indicators are essential for measuring the effectiveness of testing processes and for assessing whether the organization's testing goals, as defined by the test policy, are being met.

Other goals, such as performing product risk assessments or establishing a test organization, are related to different process areas in the TMMi model.

TMMi References:

TheTest Policy and Strategyprocess area in TMMi includes the specific goal of establishingTest Performance Indicatorsto measure and track testing performance​​.

Management commitment is highlighted as one of the critical success factors in the context of implementing and sustaining test process improvements. Within the TMMi framework, senior management support is crucial for ensuring that necessary resources, funding, and priority are allocated to the improvement initiatives. This commitment must be sustained throughout the process to overcome potential resistance and ensure that the improvements are institutionalised. Without strong management commitment, the efforts may lose momentum, and the improvement goals may not be achieved.

This factor is critical across several levels of TMMi, as seen in processes related to institutionalising the test process (such as defining organisational policies, resource allocation, and performance evaluation).

The correct order of TMMi maturity levels fromlow to highis:

Managed(Level 2): Testing becomes a managed and separate process from debugging, with formal strategies and plans.

Defined(Level 3): Testing is fully integrated into the development lifecycle, with standardized processes across projects.

Measured(Level 4): Testing processes are measured quantitatively, and product quality is evaluated with formal metrics.

This sequence reflects the increasing maturity and sophistication of an organization's testing processes as they progress through the levels.

TMMi References:

The TMMi maturity levels follow the order ofManaged (Level 2),Defined (Level 3), andMeasured (Level 4)​​.

CMMI version 2 recognises the importance of testing in software development and includes two dedicated practice areas:VerificationandValidation. These areas specifically addressthe processes required to ensure that a system or component meets its specified requirements and that the final product is fit for its intended use. While CMMI does not provide a testing-specific maturity model, these practice areas contribute to the overall quality management framework, and organisations adopting CMMI can leverage these processes to improve their testing practices. The TMMi framework complements CMMI by providing more detailed guidelines for testing.

TheTesting quadrantsmodel is an Agile practice that helps establish a test strategy, as it provides a framework for categorising different types of tests (e.g., business-facing or technology-facing) and helps in balancing test activities. Within the TMMi Level 2 process area for Test Policy and Strategy, testing quadrants offer an Agile way to define and implement a test strategy that ensures comprehensive testing across various levels and types of testing activities.

TheTMMi process area Test Planningis indeed supported by severalCMMI process areas, includingProject Planning,Requirements Management, andRisk Management. These CMMI areas provide foundational support for ensuring that the test planning process incorporates adequate project management, requirement traceability, and risk identification, all of which are critical for effective testing.

Specific Goal 2 of the CMMI Validation process arearelates to validation activities, not peer reviews, and therefore does not support the TMMi Peer Reviews process area.

Causal Analysis and Resolutionis linked toDefect Preventionin TMMi, not Quality Control.

Performance Managementdoes not directly support the Non-Functional Testing process area in TMMi.

TMMi References:

TheTMMi Test Planningprocess area is supported by relevant CMMI process areas, such asProject Planning, which helps in aligning project goals with test planning activities​​.

Formal assessments, in contrast to informal ones, are conducted with more rigor, and the results can lead to an official certification of maturity level. A formal assessment report includes a validated maturity level rating, making it distinct from informal assessments, which are used only for indicative purposes and do not result in an official rating. Thus, only formal assessments provide an assessment report with a valid maturity level rating​​.

At TMMi Level 3, the organisation's test processes become more structured, managed, and standardised. It requires defining and implementing a consistent set of test processes across projects and organisational units. One key factor for achieving TMMi Level 3 is the integration of process asset development.

"Process Asset Development" is directly related to establishing organisational test process assets, which is a critical element at TMMi Level 3. This practice area includes developing and maintaining organisational process assets, which encompass the standard processes that will be used across various projects. These assets are required to ensure that testing is a well-defined, repeatable, and efficient process throughout the organisation.

According to the TMMi Framework 1.3, process asset development supports the implementation of defined and repeatable processes and helps with creating guidelines for tailoring processes across the organisation. It provides the necessary framework for consistency in test planning, execution, and reporting, which are key at this maturity level​.

This practice aligns with the goals of TMMi Level 3, where the focus is on defining, standardising, and integrating the test lifecycle within the overall development lifecycle, thus ensuring that test processes are well-established across the organisation. Hence, Process Asset Development (Option B) is critical for the organisation's progression to TMMi Level 3.

In an Agile context, some practices from TMMi levels 4 and 5 might be considered less relevant or adjusted to fit the Agile methodology. Specifically, at TMMi level 5, testing with statistical methods may indeed be less relevant. In Agile projects, operational profiles or usage models, which are essential to perform statistically valid testing, are often not utilised. Agile methodologies focus more on incremental development and continuous feedback loops, which do not typically rely on statistical sampling methods. Therefore, the statement that "Agile projects normally do not use operational profiles or usage models of a product on which to base statistically valid inferences to help create a representative sample of tests, thus the TMMi level 5 specific goal 'Testing is performed using Statistical Methods' is considered not relevant in an Agile context" is true​.

In an Agile context, theSCRUM teammodel is a typical format for a test organisation. Testing is integrated into the cross-functional SCRUM team, with testers working alongside developers and product owners throughout the sprint. This ensures that testing is a continuous activity, rather than a separate phase. The test organisation in Agile environments focuses on collaboration and team-based activities, rather than a separate or independent test group​​.

TheActing phaseof a test improvement cycle focuses on executing the planned improvements. Key activities during this phase includecreating solutionsto address identified problems,planning actionsto implement those solutions, andpiloting solutionsbefore full-scale deployment. Thesesteps ensure that the improvements are well-defined, tested in a controlled environment, and refined before being fully implemented across the organisation.

In the TMMi framework,specific goalscan indeed havedifferent specific practicesacross maturity levels. The practices associated with a specific goal evolve as an organization matures, reflecting the need for more sophisticated approaches at higher levels of maturity. For example, test design practices atLevel 2 are more basic compared to the more comprehensive practices at Level 3, which include integration with other lifecycle processes.

The other statements are incorrect. For instance, sub-practices are informative and not mandatory, and while generic goals have the same set of practices across process areas, specific goals vary by maturity level.

TMMi References:

TMMi process areas includespecific goalsthat may havedifferent practicesdepending on the maturity level, as the process areas evolve with higher maturity​​.

In the context of TMMi, the focus of test process improvement is usually driven by business needs that aim to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and predictability of the testing process. The typical business reasons for test improvement include:

Increase predictability of testing(Option B): This refers to making the testing process more reliable and consistent, allowing better planning and forecasting of testing activities.

Reduce the costs of failure by improving effectiveness of testing(Option C): This is a direct goal of test process improvement, as it helps catch defects earlier, reducing costs associated with defects in later stages of the lifecycle.

Reduce time to market by increasing efficiency of testing activities(Option D): By making testing more efficient, organizations can release products faster while maintaining or improving quality.

Option A,Introduce a new process improvement framework, isNOTa typical business reason for test improvement. This refers to the introduction of a framework, which could be part of a process improvement strategy but is not a direct business reason for improving testing. Test improvement efforts are generally focused on achieving tangible business benefits, such as cost reduction, risk mitigation, or faster delivery, rather than the implementation of a specific framework for its own sake.

TMMi References:

TMMi emphasizes business-driven goals for process improvement that align with reducing risks, enhancing quality, and improving testing efficiency and effectiveness​.

The assessment described, where only interviews are used to collect evidence, aligns with aninformal TMMi assessment. Informal assessments are more flexible and do not require documentary evidence to corroborate interview data. They provide an indicative view of the organisation’s maturity but do not result in a formal maturity rating or certification​​.

For safety-critical systems, reliability testing is a key concern. The identified shortcoming relates to the lack of formal techniques and approaches for reliability testing. TheNon-Functional Testingprocess area, at TMMi Level 3, addresses testing non-functional aspects like reliability, performance, and usability. This process area would need specific attention as it provides a structured approach to assess non-functional risks, define testing techniques, and execute tests to verify the reliability of the product, which is critical for medical systems.

Sprint retrospectives are held at the end of every sprint (not every 2-3 iterations) to evaluate the team's performance and identify opportunities for improvement. Retrospectives are a core Agile practice, but they are not considered peer reviews, which typically involve reviewing work products such as code or design documents. Peer reviews focus on product quality, while retrospectives focus more on team performance and process improvements.