Adobe AD0-E556 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

An Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant is assigned to audit an existing Marketo Engage instance. The instance is 2 years old and follows a de-centralized model for program execution. Therefore, all marketers within the organization have been trained to operate and build in the Marketo Engage instance independently. During the audit, the consultant discovers:

1. Naming convention does not exist. Therefore, all program names are named arbitrarily.

2. There are four Marketo Engage Admins: The marketing operations manager, the demand generation manager, the CRM administrator, and the IT manager. All four admins have access to everything and have been creating fields on their own to fit individual business needs.

3. There is one workspace for the entire instance. However, the company has paid for additional workspaces.

4. There are two Revenue Lifecycle Models: a prospect lifecycle and a customer lifecycle.

The CMO wants to prioritize the following goals:

1. Ability to pull quick reports for prospect programs and customer programs from a reporting tool like Tableau.

2. Change the operating model from de-centralized to centralized so the marketing operations manager and CRM administrator are the only two people managing the operational side of the Marketo Engage instance and a new agency will manage the campaign execution on the behalf of marketing.

Which three recommendations should the Consultant make? (Choose three.)

An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect has just hired a new person to join their team. They have been tasked with building a new lifecycle model and you work together to develop a solution. The top half of the funnel stages (Known, Engaged, MQL) will be driven by Marketo Engage where as the bottom half of the funnel will be driven by specific data value changes in salesforce. Due to this quarter's budget reasons, there were not enough funds to subscribe to Revenue Explorer or Bizible but it will be prioritized for the next fiscal year.

Which scalable approach should the Architect choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately?

An organization wants to improve its Lead routing to its team across regions. Instead of using their default workspace and partition for region/country specific marketing on top of global operations, they currently have four 'regions' that cover six countries, each with their own Lead partition and Workspaces:

• EMEA: UK and Belgium

• ANZ: Australia and New Zealand

• NAM: USA

• ASIA: Japan

Singapore will be added as an additional country within 6 months.

As the organization moves away from the highly manual process of assigning leads as 'ready', the goal is to use their new Lead scoring to state that leads that are above 60 in Score are marked as MQL, and are synced to the right country team queue in their CRM. The CRM will then use automated workflows to take leads from the queues and decide which leads are assigned to which representative for that country.

Which efficient measures should betaken to make sure Leads from the right countries are synced to the correct queues in the CRM?