IIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

When an organization buys equity securities for trading purposes, it means that these securities are classified as trading securities. According to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP):

Trading securities are measured at fair value.

Unrealized gains and losses from changes in fair value are recognized in net income, not in shareholders' equity.

A. At fair value with changes reported in the shareholders' equity section. (Incorrect)

This treatment applies to available-for-sale (AFS) securities under previous GAAP rules, but not to trading securities.

Under IFRS 9, AFS classification has been removed, and most equity investments are recorded at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL).

B. At fair value with changes reported in net income. (Correct)

This is the correct treatment for trading securities, as per IFRS 9 and ASC 320 (FASB).

C. At amortized cost in the income statement. (Incorrect)

Amortized cost is used for held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, not for equity securities held for trading.

D. As current assets in the balance sheet. (Partially Correct but Incomplete)

While trading securities are usually classified as current assets, this answer does not address valuation and reporting of changes in fair value.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Investments highlights the importance of correctly valuing securities based on accounting standards.

IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments mandates fair value measurement for trading securities with gains/losses reported in profit or loss.

GAAP ASC 320 – Investments – Debt and Equity Securities aligns with IFRS, requiring fair value reporting through net income.

Explanation of Answer Choices:IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is B. At fair value with changes reported in net income.

Transfer pricing regulations aim to prevent tax evasion and ensure that intercompany transactions reflect fair market value, preventing profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions. Selling inventory at fair value (arm’s length price) aligns with regulatory requirements, reducing the risk of non-compliance.

(A) Correct – The organization sells inventory to an overseas subsidiary at fair value.

Ensuring that transactions reflect fair market value prevents regulatory violations.

Adhering to the arm’s length principle minimizes transfer pricing risks and potential tax penalties.

(B) Incorrect – The local subsidiary purchases inventory at a discounted price.

A discounted price could be seen as an attempt to shift profits between entities, increasing regulatory scrutiny.

(C) Incorrect – The organization sells inventory to an overseas subsidiary at the original cost.

Selling at the original cost does not account for market conditions, potential markup, and fair valuation.

Regulators may view this as non-compliance with the arm’s length principle.

(D) Incorrect – The local subsidiary purchases inventory at the depreciated cost.

Depreciated cost may not represent fair market value and could be interpreted as a tax avoidance mechanism.

IIA’s Global Internal Audit Standards – Compliance with Tax and Transfer Pricing Regulations

Emphasizes fair pricing in intercompany transactions to prevent regulatory violations.

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines

Reinforces the arm’s length principle as the standard for pricing related-party transactions.

COSO’s ERM Framework – Compliance Risk Management

Highlights the need for adherence to tax laws and fair-value pricing in financial transactions.

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References and Internal Auditing Standards:

Understanding E-Commerce Systems and Their Financial Impact

E-commerce systems, including electronic data interchange (EDI) and electronic funds transfer (EFT), streamline procurement and payment processes.

The main financial effect of implementing such a system is the acceleration of accounts payable transactions.

This is because automated purchasing systems allow businesses to place orders faster and in larger volumes, leading to an increase in outstanding liabilities (accounts payable) before payments are settled.

Why Option D is Correct?

Higher accounts payable occur because:

EDI automates order placement, leading to more frequent and possibly larger purchases before payments are processed.

EFT may improve payment processing speed, but it does not eliminate outstanding payables immediately.

Suppliers may extend credit terms, increasing the organization's short-term liabilities under accounts payable.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance requires internal auditors to evaluate how technology changes impact financial controls, including accounts payable management.

COBIT 5 Framework – AP Processes emphasizes that auditors should monitor financial system integration risks, including liabilities like accounts payable.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Higher cash flow and treasury balances):

E-commerce improves transaction efficiency but does not necessarily increase cash flow. It may even reduce available cash due to frequent automated purchases.

Option B (Higher inventory balances):

EDI can reduce inventory levels due to just-in-time (JIT) ordering, rather than increasing them.

Option C (Higher accounts receivable):

Accounts receivable refers to money owed to the organization, but e-commerce impacts payables (money owed by the organization) more directly.

E-commerce accelerates order processing and supplier payments, increasing accounts payable balances before payment cycles are completed.

IIA Standard 2110 and COBIT 5 stress financial controls, including monitoring accounts payable risks.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance

COBIT 5 – Accounts Payable Controls & Risks

ISO 20022 – Financial Messaging Standards (for EDI & EFT Transactions)