CertsTopics Logo

Special Summer Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

F5 301b Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
301b
Exam Name:
LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot
Certification:
LTM Specialist
Vendor:
F5
Questions:
209
Last Updated:
Apr 3, 2025
Exam Status:
Stable
F5 301b

301b: LTM Specialist Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the F5 301b (LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot) exam? Download the most recent F5 301b braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the F5 301b exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the F5 301b exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the F5 301b exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA 301b test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the F5 301b practice exam demo.

Get 301b Full Access

Related F5 Exams

LTM Specialist: Maintain & Troubleshoot Questions and Answers

Get Free 301b Questions and Answers
Question 1

A web application requires knowledge of the client's true IP address for logging and analysis purposes. Instances of the application that can decode X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers reside in pool_a, while pool_b instances assume the source IP is the true address of the client.

Which iRule provides the proper functionality?

Options:

A.

when HTTP_DATA {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

B.

when HTTP_RESPONSE {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

C.

when HTTP_REQUEST {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

D.

when HTTP_OPEN {

if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{

pool pool_a

} else {

pool pool_b

}

}

Buy Now
Question 2

A failover event is recorded in the log messages:

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 01140029:5: HA proc_running tmm fails action is go offline and down links.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0050:5: Sod requests links down.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0054:5: Offline for traffic group /Common/traffic-group-1.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c003e:5: Offline

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice logger: /usr/bin/tmipsecd --tmmcount 4 ==> /usr/bin/bigstart stop racoon

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP info lacpd[5502]: 01160016:6: Failover event detected. (Switchboard failsafe disabled while offline)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP err bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0010:3: Failover event detected. Marking external interfaces down. bsx.c(3633)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP info bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0015:6: Link: 1.1 is DOWN

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143c:5: Connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 has been removed

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 port 6699

What is the cause of the failover?

Options:

A.

TMM failed, and VLAN fail-safe initiated the failover.

B.

TMM failed, and system fail-safe initiated the failover.

C.

Loss of connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 initiated the failover.

D.

A switchboard failure caused system fail-safe to initiate the failover.

Question 3

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

A company uses a complex piece of client software that connects to one or more virtual servers (VS) hosted on an LTM device. The client software is experiencing issues. An LTM Specialist must determine the cause of the problem.

The LTM Specialist is seeing a client source IP of 168.210.232.5 in the tcpdump. However, the client source IP is actually 10.123.17.12.

Why does the IP address of 10.123.17.12 fail to appear in the tcpdump?

Options:

A.

The LTM device performed NAT on the individual's IP address.

B.

The Secure Network Address Translation (SNAT) pool on the virtual server is activated.

C.

Network Address Translation (NAT) has occurred in the path between the client and the LTM device.

D.

The individual's data stream is being routed to the LTM device by a means other than the default route.

Get Free 301b Questions and Answers