Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Explanation

* If you need to scale a JMS provider/ message broker, - add nodes to scale it horizontally or - add memory to scale it vertically * Cons of adding another JMS provider/ message broker: - adds cost. - adds complexity to use two JMS brokers - adds Operational overhead if we use two brokers, say, ActiveMQ and IBM MQ * So Two options that mention to use two brokers are not best choice. * It's mentioned that "The Fulfillment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilled message. Each OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application." - When you publish a message on a topic, it goes to all the subscribers who are interested - so zero to many subscribers will receive a copy of the message. - When you send a message on a queue, it will be received by exactly one consumer. * As we need multiple consumers to consume the message below option is not valid choice: "Order messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ exchange. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ queue. Both microservices interact with Anypoint MQ as the message broker, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" * Order messages are only consumed by one Mule application, the Fulfillment microservice, so we will publish it on queue and OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application so it need to be published on Topic using same broker. * Correct Answer: Best choice in this scenario is: "Order messages are sent to a JMS queue. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to a JMS topic. Both microservices interact with the same JMS provider (message broker) instance, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" Tried to depict scenario in diagram:

Diagram Description automatically generated

Explanation

* Organization can continue using existing load balancer even if backend application changes are there. So option A is ruled out.

* As Mule runtime is within their datacenter, this model is RTF and not PCE. So option C is ruled out.

Mule runtime deployment model within their datacenter, so each Mule runtime hosts several Mule applications -- This mean PCE or Hybird not RTF - Also mentioned in Question is that - Mule runtime is hosting several Mule Application, so that also rules out RTF and as for hosting multiple Application it will have Domain project which need redesign to make it microservice architecture

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Correct Answer: Required redesign of Mule applications to follow microservice architecture principles

To meet the reliability requirements for Mule applications deployed to a Runtime Fabric (RTF) cluster, where data needs to be shared across application replicas and persist through restarts, the best approach is to use Anypoint Object Store v2. This service is designed to provide persistent storage that can be shared among different application instances and across restarts. Steps include:

• Configure Object Store v2: Set up Anypoint Object Store v2 in the Mule application to handle data storage needs.
• Persistent Data Handling: Ensure that the configuration allows data to be shared and persist, meeting the requirements for reliability and consistency.

This solution leverages MuleSoft's cloud-based storage service optimized for these use cases, ensuring data integrity and availability.

References

• MuleSoft Documentation on Object Store v2
• Configuring Persistent Data Storage in MuleSoft