Summer Special - Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: top65certs

Salesforce MuleSoft MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Syllabus Exam Questions Answers

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect 1 (SU24) Exam Questions and Answers

Question 37

Refer to the exhibit.

A shopping cart checkout process consists of a web store backend sending a sequence of API invocations to an Experience API, which in turn invokes a Process API. All API invocations are over HTTPS POST. The Java web store backend executes in a Java EE application server, while all API implementations are Mule applications executing in a customer -hosted Mule runtime.

End-to-end correlation of all HTTP requests and responses belonging to each individual checkout Instance is required. This is to be done through a common correlation ID, so that all log entries written by the web store backend, Experience API implementation, and Process API implementation include the same correlation ID for all requests and responses belonging to the same checkout instance.

What is the most efficient way (using the least amount of custom coding or configuration) for the web store backend and the implementations of the Experience API and Process API to participate in end-to-end correlation of the API invocations for each checkout instance?

A)

The web store backend, being a Java EE application, automatically makes use of the thread-local correlation ID generated by the Java EE application server and automatically transmits that to the Experience API using HTTP-standard headers

No special code or configuration is included in the web store backend, Experience API, and Process API implementations to generate and manage the correlation ID

B)

The web store backend generates a new correlation ID value at the start of checkout and sets it on the X-CORRELATlON-lt HTTP request header In each API invocation belonging to that checkout

No special code or configuration is included in the Experience API and Process API implementations to generate and manage the correlation ID

C)

The Experience API implementation generates a correlation ID for each incoming HTTP request and passes it to the web store backend in the HTTP response, which includes it in all subsequent API invocations to the Experience API.

The Experience API implementation must be coded to also propagate the correlation ID to the Process API in a suitable HTTP request header

D)

The web store backend sends a correlation ID value in the HTTP request body In the way required by the Experience API

The Experience API and Process API implementations must be coded to receive the custom correlation ID In the HTTP requests and propagate It in suitable HTTP request headers

Options:

A.

Option A

B.

Option B

C.

Option C

D.

Option D

Question 38

A project uses Jenkins to implement CI/CD process. It was observed that each Mule package contains some of the Jenkins files and folders for configurations of CI/CD jobs.

As these files and folders are not part of the actual package, expectation is that these should not be part of deployed archive.

Which file can be used to exclude these files and folders from the deployed archive?

Options:

A.

muleignore

B.

_unTrackMule

C.

mulelnclude

D.

_muleExclude

Question 39

A leading e-commerce giant will use Mulesoft API's on runtime fabric (RTF) to process customer orders. Some customer's sensitive information such as credit card information is also there as a part of a API payload.

What approach minimizes the risk of matching sensitive data to the original and can convert back to the original value whenever and wherever required?

Options:

A.

Apply masking to hide the sensitive information and then use API

B.

manager to detokenize the masking format to return the original value

C.

create a tokenization format and apply a tokenization policy to the API Gateway

D.

Used both masking and tokenization

E.

Apply a field level encryption policy in the API Gateway

Question 40

Refer to the exhibit.

An organization uses a 2-node Mute runtime cluster to host one stateless API implementation. The API is accessed over HTTPS through a load balancer that uses round-robin for load distribution.

Two additional nodes have been added to the cluster and the load balancer has been configured to recognize the new nodes with no other change to the load balancer.

What average performance change is guaranteed to happen, assuming all cluster nodes are fully operational?

Options:

A.

50% reduction in the response time of the API

B.

100% increase in the throughput of the API

C.

50% reduction In the JVM heap memory consumed by each node

D.

50% reduction In the number of requests being received by each node