Pearson PMI-ACP New Attempt

Implement a dynamic feedback platform leveraging collaboration tools, accommodating diverse schedules and enabling stakeholders to provide feedback asynchronously.

Establish a rotating stakeholder committee composed of representatives from different regions and departments, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered in decision-making processes.

Enforce a strict policy requiring stakeholders to attend weekly synchronous feedback sessions, leveraging technology to accommodate various time zones and scheduling conflicts.

Appoint regional liaison officers responsible for coordinating stakeholder interactions within their respective time zones, facilitating regular communication and feedback exchange.

Provide feedback for completed user stories.

Define how the features will be implemented.

Tell the team which features to include in the backlog.

Write acceptance criteria for the user stories.

Ownership, because team members will be in charge of whatever happens during the project life cycle.

Conflict is not productive and team members should resolve issues by themselves.

Better decision-making, because the team is encouraged to join in constructive conflict.

Leaders should incentivize conflict because it is inevitable in the workplace.

Suggest pair programming during the retrospective.

Ask the product owner to re-prioritize the user stories at the next retrospective.

Re-estimate the story points with team members at the next iteration planning meeting.

Assign less complex user stories to the inexperienced software engineer at the next iteration planning meeting.