Month End Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

Online ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions Video

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Questions and Answers

Question 37

The application used by an organization has a complicated user interface. What does the complicated user interface represent in this case?

Options:

A.

An intrinsic vulnerability, since it is a characteristic of the asset

B.

An extrinsic vulnerability, since it is fin external factor that impacts the asset

C.

A type of threat, since it may result in an unwanted incident

Question 38

Scenario 8: BioVitalis

BioVitalis is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, the US Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, BioVitalis places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation BioVitalis has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.

In preparation for the recertification audit. BioVitalis conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment. Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.

During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader

BioVitalis's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvementDecisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow up action plans, which were then approved by top management.

In response to the review outcomes. BioVitalis promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its Information security measures Additionally, dashboard tools were Introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities.

Furthermore. BioVitalis embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities

Top management decided that theinformation ownerwould also be responsible for executing measurement activities across ISMS processes.

Question:

Did BioVitalis define the roles for measurement activities correctly?

Options:

A.

Yes – the information owner can also be responsible for conducting measurement activities

B.

No – as the information owner cannot perform different measurement-related roles and responsibilities

C.

No – as the responsibility for conducting measurement activities should have been assigned to the information communicator

Question 39

An organization has established a policy that provides the personnel with the information required to effectively deploy encryption solutions in order to protect organizational confidential data. What type of policy is this?

Options:

A.

High-level general policy

B.

High-level topic-specific policy

C.

Topic-specific policy

Question 40

Scenario 9: CoreBit Systems

CoreBit Systems, with its headquarters m San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions, its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients a smooth transition into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.

Recently. John, the internal auditor of CoreBit Systems, conducted an internal audit which uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities, in response to the identified nonconformities. CoreBit Systems decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to solve these issues systematically. The method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of issues. This approach involves several steps. First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.

Following the analysis of the root cause of the nonconformities, CoreBit Systems's ISMS project manager. Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective action for addressing a nonconformity, Julia identified the issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its reoccurrence Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Afterward. Julia combined all the nonconformities Into a single action plan and sought approval from the top management.

The submitted action plan was written as follows:

A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department.

However. Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process, and notably, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.

Julia, the ISMS project manager, developed a combined action plan for all nonconformities. However, it was rejected, revised, and resubmitted late—without defined execution schedules.

Question:

Did CoreBit Systems have a plan in place to implement permanent corrective action to address the identified nonconformities?

Options:

A.

Yes – CoreBit Systems had a comprehensive plan in place to implement permanent corrective actions

B.

No – CoreBit Systems did not have a clear plan to implement a permanent corrective action

C.

No – CoreBit Systems decided not to pursue this course of action