Online IEPPE Questions Video

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In this scenario, Mike is a Certified Technician (C.Tech.) working in a municipal government infrastructure department. As a professional under the Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists (OACETT), he is required to adhere to the Code of Ethics and Professional Practice Guidelines.

Ethical and Professional Responsibility:

Public Safety and Welfare:

OACETT’s Code of Ethics explicitly states that certified members must prioritize public welfare and safety over financial or business interests.

The design flaw in the water catchment system makes the area highly susceptible to flooding during severe rainfall, which presents a safety hazard for the community.

Professional Responsibility and Accountability:

As a C.Tech., Mike has a duty to identify and report deficiencies in engineering designs that could result in public harm.

By stamping the flawed design, Mike would be accepting responsibility for a system that he knows is inadequate, which could lead to legal liability, professional discipline, or reputational damage.

Consequences of Stamping the Design:

If Mike proceeds with stamping the design despite knowing its flaws, he could face disciplinary action from OACETT.

The correct answer, B, indicates that the developer (or another stakeholder) could file a professional practice complaint against him with OACETT.

OACETT may then conduct an investigation under its disciplinary procedures, which could result in penalties such as:

Reprimand or Suspension of Certification

Revocation of Membership

Fines or Other Professional Sanctions

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

Option A (Incorrect):

There is a professional practice issue because stamping a flawed design that compromises public safety violates OACETT's ethical and professional standards.

Option C (Incorrect):

While the manager may value Mike’s decision to comply, supporting a flawed design does not align with professional integrity.

Promotions should be based on ethical and competent practice, not on avoiding conflicts with developers.

Option D (Incorrect):

The question does not mention solar panel installation.

Additional technical courses are not an appropriate consequence in this case, as the issue is not a lack of technical expertise but an ethical and professional responsibility failure.

References to Certified Engineering Technologist (CET) Objectives and Documents:

OACETT Code of Ethics: “Members shall regard the welfare of the public, the environment, and the employer as paramount.”

Professional Misconduct under the Ontario Professional Engineers Act and OACETT Bylaws: Stamping or approving a flawed design knowingly can be considered negligence or professional misconduct.

Risk Management in Engineering Practice: Ethical engineers and technologists must identify risks and ensure that public safety concerns are addressed, regardless of business pressures.

By refusing to stamp the design, Mike upholds his professional integrity and protects public safety, fulfilling his ethical obligations as a Certified Technician.

Misuse ofconfidential company or client information on social mediais aserious breach of professional ethics and workplace policies. It can lead totermination, legal action, and loss of professional certification.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Why Confidential Information Must Be Protected:

Many companies havenon-disclosure agreements (NDAs)requiring employees tokeep sensitive data private.

Leaking financial reports, trade secrets, or client dataon social media can causefinancial losses and legal liability.

Examples of Confidential Information:

Engineering firms: Postingdesign plans or blueprintsof an upcoming infrastructure project.

Technology companies: Sharingsource code or unreleased product details.

Government contracts: Disclosingconfidential project discussions.

Why Option C Is Correct:

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information is the most serious offense.

Employers can terminate employees immediatelyfor violating confidentiality agreements.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Posting a compliment)–Positive comments are not a violationunless they include sensitive details.

B (Picture of colleagues at a bar)–Might be unprofessional but unlikely to result in termination.

D (Posting family photos during work time)– May violateinternet usage policies, butnot a fireable offense.

Non est factum(Latin for"it is not my deed") is a legal defense used whena person signs a contract but did not understand its nature due to a fundamental mistake.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of Non Est Factum–

Applies whena person unknowingly signs a contract that is entirely different from what they intended to sign.

The personmust prove they were not carelessin signing it.

When Is It Used?

Used byindividuals with disabilities (e.g., blindness, illiteracy)who were misled about the contract’s nature.

Why Option D Is Correct:

The doctrineprotects individuals who genuinely did not understandwhat they were signing.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Unsound mind)– People withmental incapacitymay use a different legal defense.

B (Alcohol or drugs)– Being intoxicateddoes not automatically invalidate acontract.

C (Corporations overstepping charters)– This involvescorporate law, not non est factum.

TheRule of Lawis a fundamental principle in Canada, ensuring thatlaws apply equally to everyone, including government officials.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Definition of Rule of Law– The concept thatno one is above the law, and laws must befairly and consistently applied.

Why This Principle Is Important– It preventsabuse of powerand ensuresjustice for all citizens.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B (Law controls citizens)– Misleading; laws protect rights rather than just control.

C (Law is a set of rules)– Partially true, butdoesn’t explain equality under the law.

D (Law governs society)– Too broad;rule of law emphasizes fairness and equal application.