Full Access Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Tutorials

When adapting the COBIT framework, one of the most critical factors to consider is enterprise goals. These goals drive the overall strategy and priorities of the governance and management system.

Enterprise goals are a cornerstone of the COBIT goals cascade, which translates stakeholder needs into specific, actionable governance and management objectives. Understanding and aligning with enterprise goals ensures that IT initiatives support the broader business strategy and deliver value.

COBIT 2019 Framework References:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5:Describes the goals cascade and the importance of aligning governance and management objectives with enterprise goals.

COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Emphasizes the need to consider enterprise goals when designing and implementing a governance system.

By focusing on enterprise goals, the enterprise can ensure that its IT governance framework is aligned with its strategic priorities, enhancing overall performance and value delivery.

For a traditional brick-and-mortar company planning to fast-track its growth by implementing an information and technology governance system to achieve enterprise goals, establishing applicable governance and management objectives is the key enabler of success.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective underscores the importance of defining clear governance and management objectives to guide the implementation and achieve enterprise goals.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4:This chapter discusses the importance of setting relevant and applicable governance and management objectives to align IT governance with business strategy and goals.

By establishing clear governance and management objectives, the company can ensure that its IT governance efforts are aligned with its strategic goals, driving growth and achieving desired outcomes.

The function responsible for executing a contract that retains independent legal consultants to review the level of regulatory compliance of a proposed IT solution is the Legal Office. This function ensures that all legal aspects, including compliance with regulations, are thoroughly reviewed and addressed.

References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective highlights the role of the legal function in managing risk and compliance.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter underscores the responsibilities of the legal office in ensuring that IT solutions comply with regulatory requirements.

The legal office is best positioned to manage contracts with legal consultants and ensure that the proposed IT solution adheres to all necessary legal and regulatory standards.

In COBIT 2019, the prioritization of governance objectives is essential to ensure that the most critical aspects of IT governance receive the necessary focus and resources. A matrixed scoring methodology is considered the best enabler for prioritizing governance objectives because it provides a structured, systematic, and quantifiable approach to evaluating and ranking various governance objectives based on multiple criteria.

Detailed Explanation with References:

IT Strategic Plan (Option A):

The IT strategic plan outlines the strategic direction and objectives of IT within the organization. While it provides guidance on long-term goals and initiatives, it does not offer a detailed mechanism for prioritizing specific governance objectives.

Matrixed Scoring Methodology (Option B):

A matrixed scoring methodology allows the organization to evaluate governance objectives against a set of predefined criteria such as strategic alignment, risk impact, resource availability, and expected benefits. This methodology helps in objectively assessing and comparing the importance and urgency of different governance objectives. By assigning scores to each criterion, organizations can create a prioritized list based on overall scores, ensuring that the most critical and impactful objectives are addressed first.

This approach is comprehensive and takes into account multiple factors, providing a balanced and transparent means of prioritizing objectives. It enables decision-makers to justify their choices and ensures that prioritization is aligned with the organization's strategic goals and risk profile.

Enterprise's Risk Tolerance (Option C):

The enterprise's risk tolerance is an important factor in governance decisions, as it defines the level of risk the organization is willing to accept. However, while it influences prioritization, it is not a standalone methodology for prioritizing governance objectives. Risk tolerance must be considered within a broader context of criteria, which a matrixed scoring methodology can effectively encompass.

Expected Performance Outcomes (Option D):

Expected performance outcomes are crucial for evaluating the success of governance initiatives, but they do not provide a methodology for prioritizing objectives. They are one of the factors that can be included in a matrixed scoring methodology to assess the potential impact and value of each objective.

Conclusion:The correct answer isB. A matrixed scoring methodology. This method provides a robust, multi-criteria approach to prioritizing governance objectives, ensuring that decisions are made based on a balanced consideration of various relevant factors.

References:

ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA.

ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.