AWS Certified Professional SAP-C02 Dumps PDF

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional Questions and Answers

Question 129

A company's public API runs as tasks on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS). The tasks run on AWS Fargate behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and are configured with Service Auto Scaling for the tasks based on CPU utilization. This service has been running well for several months.

Recently, API performance slowed down and made the application unusable. The company discovered that a significant number of SQL injection attacks had occurred against the API and that the API service had scaled to its maximum amount.

A solutions architect needs to implement a solution that prevents SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. The solution must allow legitimate traffic through and must maximize operational efficiency.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Options:

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL to monitor the HTTP requests and HTTPS requests that are forwarded to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF Bot Control implementation. Add a rule in the AWS WAF Bot Control managed rule group to monitor traffic and allow only legitimate traffic to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL. Add a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group. Set the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules. Attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Create a new AWS WAF web ACL. Create a new empty IP set in AWS WAF. Add a new rule to the web ACL to block requests that originate from IP addresses in the new IP set. Create an AWS Lambda function that scrapes the API logs for IP addresses that send SQL injection attacks, and add those IP addresses to the IP set. Attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks.

Answer:

Explanation:

The company should create a new AWS WAF web ACL. The company should add a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group. The company should set the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules. The company should attach the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks. This solution will meet the requirements because AWS WAF is a web application firewall that lets you monitor and control web requests that are forwarded to your web applications. You can use AWS WAF to define customizable web security rules that control which traffic can access your web applications and which traffic should be blocked1. By creating a new AWS WAF web ACL, the company can create a collection of rules that define the conditions for allowing or blocking web requests. By adding a new rule that blocks requests that match the SQL database rule group, the company can prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. The SQL database rule group is a managed rule group provided by AWS that contains rules to protect against common SQL injection attack patterns2. By setting the web ACL to allow all other traffic that does not match those rules, the company can ensure that legitimate traffic can access the API service. By attaching the web ACL to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks, the company can apply the web security rules to all requests that are forwarded by the load balancer.

The other options are not correct because:

Creating a new AWS WAF Bot Control implementation would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. AWS WAF Bot Control is a feature that gives you visibility and control over common and pervasive bot traffic that can consume excess resources, skew metrics, cause downtime, or perform other undesired activities. However, it does not protect against SQL injection attacks, which are malicious attempts to execute unauthorized SQL statements against your database3.

Creating a new AWS WAF web ACL to monitor the HTTP requests and HTTPS requests that are forwarded to the ALB in front of the ECS tasks would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. Monitoring mode is a feature that enables you to evaluate how your rules would perform without actually blocking any requests. However, this mode does not provide any protection against attacks, as it only logs and counts requests that match your rules4.

Creating a new AWS WAF web ACL and creating a new empty IP set in AWS WAF would not prevent SQL injection attacks from reaching the ECS API service. An IP set is a feature that enables you to specify a list of IP addresses or CIDR blocks that you want to allow or block based on their source IP address. However, this approach would not be effective or efficient against SQL injection attacks, as it would require constantly updating the IP set with new IP addresses of attackers, and it would not block attackers who use proxies or VPNs.

[References:, https://aws.amazon.com/waf/, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/aws-managed-rule-groups-list.html#sql-injection-rule-group, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-bot-control.html, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/web-acl-monitoring-mode.html, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-ip-sets.html, , , , , ]

Question 130

A company manages hundreds of AWS accounts centrally in an organization in AWS Organizations. The company recently started to allow product teams to create and manage their own S3 access points in their accounts. The S3 access points can be accessed only within VPCs not on the internet.

What is the MOST operationally efficient way to enforce this requirement?

Options:

Set the S3 access point resource policy to deny the s3 CreateAccessPoint action unless the s3: AccessPointNetworkOngm condition key evaluates to VPC.

Create an SCP at the root level in the organization to deny the s3 CreateAccessPoint action unless the s3 AccessPomtNetworkOngin condition key evaluates to VPC.

Use AWS CloudFormation StackSets to create a new 1AM policy in each AVVS account that allows the s3: CreateAccessPoint action only if the s3 AccessPointNetworkOrigin condition key evaluates to VPC.

Set the S3 bucket policy to deny the s3: CreateAccessPoint action unless the s3AccessPointNetworkOrigin condition key evaluates to VPC.

Question 131

A mobile gaming company is expanding into the global market. The company's game servers run in the us-east-1 Region. The game's client application uses UDP to communicate with the game servers and needs to be able to connect to a set of static IP addresses.

The company wants its game to be accessible on multiple continents. The company also wants the game to maintain its network performance and global availability.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Options:

Provision an Application Load Balancer (ALB) in front of the game servers. Create an Amazon CloudFront distribution that has no geographical restrictions. Set the ALB as the origin. Perform DNS lookups for the cloudfront.net domain name. Use the resulting IP addresses in the game's client application.

Provision game servers in each AWS Region. Provision an Application Load Balancer in front of the game servers. Create an Amazon Route 53 latency-based routing policy for the game's client application to use with DNS lookups.

Provision game servers in each AWS Region. Provision a Network Load Balancer (NLB) in front of the game servers. Create an accelerator in AWS Global Accelerator, and configure endpoint groups in each Region. Associate the NLBs with the corresponding Regional endpoint groups. Point the game client's application to the Global Accelerator endpoints.

Provision game servers in each AWS Region. Provision a Network Load Balancer (NLB) in front of the game servers. Create an Amazon CloudFront distribution that has no geographical restrictions. Set the NLB as the origin. Perform DNS lookups for the cloudfront.net domain name. Use the resulting IP addresses in the game's client application.

Question 132

A company is running a web application in a VPC. The web application runs on a group of Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The ALB is using AWS WAF.

An external customer needs to connect to the web application. The company must provide IP addresses to all external customers.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Options:

Replace the ALB with a Network Load Balancer (NLB). Assign an Elastic IP address to the NLB.

Allocate an Elastic IP address. Assign the Elastic IP address to the ALProvide the Elastic IP address to the customer.

Create an AWS Global Accelerator standard accelerator. Specify the ALB as the accelerator's endpoint. Provide the accelerator's IP addresses to the customer.

Configure an Amazon CloudFront distribution. Set the ALB as the origin. Ping the distribution's DNS name to determine the distribution's public IP address. Provide the IP address to the customer.

Spring Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

AWS Certified Professional SAP-C02 Dumps PDF

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional Questions and Answers

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

CompTIA

Fortinet

Microsoft

Salesforce