Adobe Commerce AD0-E722 Adobe Study Notes

This action is necessary to make the attribute available for content staging and preview. According to the Adobe Commerce documentation, the catalogstaging_category_update_form.xml file defines the fields that are displayed in the Scheduled Changes section of the category form. The file extends the category_form.xml file and adds additional fields that are specific to content staging, such as start and end dates, campaign name, description, etc. To include a custom category attribute in the Scheduled Changes section, the attribute must also be declared in the catalogstaging_category_update_form.xml file with the same configuration as in the category_form.xml file.

References:

• Content staging | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide
• Create a category attribute | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

According to the Adobe Commerce documentation, the output of a GraphQL mutation is declared by specifying the type of the data returned by the mutation. The type can be either a scalar type (such as String, Int, Boolean, etc.), an object type (such as Cart, Product, Customer, etc.), or a union type (such as SearchResult, which can be either Product or Category). A union type is used when the mutation can return more than one possible type of data, depending on the input or the logic of the mutation. In this case, the mutation can return either a Cart type or a ConfigurableProduct type, depending onthe number of variants of the configurable product. Therefore, the output of the mutation should be declared as a union type that includes both Cart and ConfigurableProduct types. Option B is the only option that correctly declares a union type using the pipe symbol (|) to separate the possible types. Option A and Option C are incorrect because they use brackets ([ ]) and curly braces ({ }), which are used for declaring list types and input object types, respectively.

References:

• GraphQL API - Adobe Inc.
• Schema language with GraphQL | Adobe Commerce

Option C is the correct solution because declaring a capture command with type Magento\Payment\Gateway\Command\NullCommand for the payment method command pool in di.xml will prevent the default capture logic from being executed. The NullCommand class is a dummy implementation of the CommandInterface that does nothing. This way, the payment capture will be handled by the PSP webhook, and the invoice will be created accordingly12

Option A is not a correct solution because adding a plugin before the $invoice->capture() and changing its input to prevent the call of the $payment->capture() will require modifying the core Magento code, which is not recommended. Moreover, this solution will affect all payment methods that use the invoice capture logic, not just the monthly installments payment extension3

Option B is not a correct solution because changing the can_capture attribute for the payment method under config.xml to be 0 will disable the capture functionality for the payment method entirely. This means that the invoice cannot be created or captured, even by the PSP webhook4

References:

1: 2: 3: 4: guide/payments-integrations/payment-gateway/payment-gateway-configuration.html?lang=en#payment-method-configuration