GRI ESRS-Professional Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

TheEU Taxonomyand theESRS digital taxonomyserve different purposes in sustainability reporting:

EU Taxonomyis a classification system that identifiesenvironmentally sustainable economic activitiesand establishes criteria for determining their contribution to environmental objectives. It is primarily used to guide investment decisions and financial disclosures​.

ESRS Digital Taxonomyis a structureddigital frameworkthat ensures sustainability disclosures aremachine-readable, standardized, and comparableunder theCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)​.

Key Differences:Aspect

EU Taxonomy

ESRS Digital Taxonomy

Purpose

Classifies sustainable economic activities

Enables structured digital sustainability reporting

Scope

Environmental focus on investments & economic activities

Comprehensive reporting across environmental, social, and governance (ESG) areas

Users

Financial institutions, investors

Reporting entities, auditors, regulators

Regulation

UnderEU Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852)

UnderCSRD (Directive 2022/2464/EU)

References:

EU Platform on Sustainable Finance Report: Simplifying the EU Taxonomy​

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772​

Under the ESRS framework, financial materiality is assessed based on a combination of:

Likelihood of occurrence– The probability that a sustainability matter will have a financial impact.

Potential magnitude of financial effects– The scale of the impact on financial position, performance, cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital over short-, medium-, or long-term periods​.

This is outlined in ESRS 1, which states that a sustainability matter isfinancially materialif it could reasonably be expected totrigger material financial effectson an undertaking. Financial materiality is not limited to issues under the direct control of the company; it includesdependencies on natural, human, and social resourcesthat could create risks or opportunities​.

Option A:The ESRS framework allows for bothqualitative and quantitative thresholds, not just monetary ones (e.g., revenue or costs)​.

Option C:Reputational risks can be financially material, as they may affect access to finance, cost of capital, or customer trust, ultimately influencing the company’s financial performance​.

Option D:Thefinancial materiality assessmentis conducted for theshort-, medium-, and long-term, not just the short term​.

Why the other options are incorrect:References:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772​

Compilation Explanations January - July 2024, ESRS 1 on Financial Materiality​

EFRAG Guidance on Double Materiality and Risk Assessments​

Impact materiality is indeed considered thestarting pointfor thedouble materiality assessmentin the ESRS. The reason is that material impacts on sustainability matters cangenerate financial risks and opportunitiesin the future. TheESRS frameworkfollows this structure because:

Interrelation Between Impact and Financial Materiality

Double materiality includestwo dimensions:a)Impact materiality(how the company affects people and the environment).b)Financial materiality(how sustainability matters affect the company’s financial performance).

Impact materiality assessments oftenprecedefinancial materiality because many sustainability issues initially manifest asexternal environmental and social impactsbefore affecting the company’sfinancial results​.

Regulatory Confirmation of Impact as the Starting Point

According toESRS 1, section 3.3, impact materiality is typically assessedfirst, unless afinancial risk or opportunity exists independentlyof an impact​.

A sustainability mattermay become financially materialover time due to regulatory changes, evolving market expectations, or direct financial consequences.

Illustration of the Double Materiality Process

Example: A company engaged inhigh carbon emissionsmight initially consider this animpact materiality issue(environmental harm). However,increased carbon pricing, regulatory changes, and shifting investor preferencescan latertransform this into a financial materiality issue.

Conclusion:Sinceimpact materiality serves as a precursorto financial materiality in most cases, the statement istrue.

Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, ESRS 1, Section 3.3:Double Materiality Framework​.

EFRAG Compilation of Explanations (January - July 2024): Confirmation that impact materiality assessment is the typicalentry point​.