Free and Premium Appian ACD200 Dumps Questions Answers

The three actions that can be taken to minimize the performance impact of the Tempo report are:

• Limit the number of series values and categories in the report. This is because having too many series values and categories can make the report difficult to read and render, as well as increase the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the database to Appian. A good practice is to limit the number of series values to 10 or less, and the number of categories to 20 or less.
• Use local variables in your report interface to avoid redundant database queries. This is because local variables can store the results of database queries and reuse them in multiple places within the interface, reducing the number of times the database is accessed. A good practice is to use local variables for common filters, aggregations, or calculations that are used in multiple charts or grids.
• Perform aggregation in the database using a view prior to reading the data into Appian. This is because performing aggregation in the database can reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the database to Appian, as well as leverage the database’s optimization capabilities. A good practice is to create a view in the database that performs the aggregation and then query that view using Appian. References: Report Performance Best Practices

The question is about the recommendations for Appian environment to address the performance risk of a large increase in users. The following are two recommendations for this purpose:

• Add more process execution engines. This means adding more servers or nodes that can execute process instances in parallel, which can improve the scalability and availability of Appian. This can help handle the increased workload and demand from more users without affecting the response time or reliability of Appian.
• Add more application server memory. This means increasing the amount of memory allocated to each server or node that runs Appian components, such as web servers, engines, or analytics servers. This can help improve the performance and stability of Appian by reducing memory pressure and garbage collection.

The following are not recommendations for Appian environment to address the performance risk of a large increase in users:

• Add more design engines. This means adding more servers or nodes that can execute expression rules or interface components in parallel, which can improve the performance and scalability of Appian. However, this is not directly related to the number of users, but rather to the complexity and frequency of expression rules or interface components in the application.
• Switch from a records-centric to a process-centric design. This means changing the application design to focus more on process models and tasks, rather than records and reports. This does not affect the Appian environment, but rather the application logic and functionality. This may or may not improve the performance of the application, depending on the requirements and use cases.

References:

• Process Execution Engines
• Memory Recommendations
• Design Engines
• Records-Centric vs Process-Centric Design

 Two things that can be done to increase the performance of a poorly-performing process model that has a lot of nodes and is mainly used to do background updates are:

• Remove all activity chaining. Activity chaining is a feature that allows a process to move from one node to another without waiting for a commit point. This can improve the performance of some processes, but it can also cause memory issues and data inconsistency if used excessively or incorrectly. Removing activity chaining can reduce the memory consumption and ensure data integrity of the process model.
• Refactor some nodes into subprocesses when possible. Subprocesses are processes that are called from within another process model. Refactoring some nodes into subprocesses can simplify the main process model and improve its readability and maintainability. It can also reduce the memory usage and execution time of the main process model, as subprocesses are executed in parallel and have their own memory allocation. References: Activity Chaining, Subprocess Node, Process Model Best Practices

The appian_log4j.properties file is used to configure the logging levels for Appian components, including authentication. You can modify this file to increase or decrease the verbosity of the log output for different categories. For example, to enable trace-level logging for SAML authentication, you can add this line to the file: log4j.logger.com.appiancorp.suite.authentication.saml=TRACE References: [Appian Logging Configuration], [SAML Troubleshooting]

 The metric from the data_store_details.csv file that will help you understand the number of operations against data store is Total Count. This metric represents the total number of queries, inserts, updates, deletes, and executes performed against the data store during the specified time period. You can use this metric to identify which data stores are heavily used and may need performance tuning or scaling. References: [Data Store Details Report], [Data Store Metrics]

 A sprint retrospective is a meeting that takes place at the end of each sprint, where the team reflects on what went well and what can be improved in their work process. The purpose of the retrospective is to identify and implement actions that can enhance the team’s performance and satisfaction in future sprints. Two basic questions that can help facilitate the retrospective are: What went well? and What didn’t go well and can be improved? These questions allow the team to celebrate their achievements, acknowledge their challenges, and generate ideas for improvement.

 The question is about the default limit for maximum number of node executions in a repeating step in a process. The default limit is 1000, as it is the value of the system property conf.bpm.maxNodeExecutionsPerInstance, which controls how many times a node can be executed in a single process instance. This limit is intended to prevent infinite loops or excessive node executions that could affect the performance or stability of Appian. The other options are not correct, as they are either too high or too low. References:

• Repeating Steps in Processes
• System Properties Reference

A joining table can be used to hold instances of Student/Class relationships, so that it can be supported in Appian and remain in at least First Normal Form. A joining table is a table that contains only foreign keys that reference the primary keys of other tables. A joining table can be used to model a Many-to-Many relationship between two entities, such as Student and Class. For example, a joining table called Enrollment could have two columns: Student_ID and Class_ID, which reference the primary keys of the Student and Class tables respectively. Each row in the Enrollment table represents an instance of a student enrolled in a class. References: [Joining Tables], [Many-to-Many Relationships], [First Normal Form]

The question is about referencing and using arrays of a CDT (Custom Data Type). The following statements are true:

• There is no difference between using “dot notation” and the index() function. Both methods can be used to access elements of an array by their position. For example, if a is an array of CDTs, then a[1] and index(a, 1) will return the same element.
• An array of integers can be passed as the second parameter to the index() function to return the data at those positions in the array. For example, if a is an array of CDTs, then index(a, {1, 3, 5}) will return an array of CDTs containing the elements at positions 1, 3, and 5 in a.

The following statements are false:

• Other Appian functions can be used within the square brackets “[]” when using dot notation to return specific data from the array. This is not possible, as dot notation only accepts integers or integer arrays as indices. For example, if a is an array of CDTs, then a[length(a)] will cause an error, as length(a) is not a valid index.
• The function wherecontains can act on operands of different types. This is not true, as wherecontains only works on operands of the same type. For example, if a is an array of CDTs and b is an array of integers, then wherecontains(a, b) will cause an error, as a and b are not of the same type.

References:

• Dot Notation
• index()
• wherecontains()

According to Appian best practices, environment-specific constants should be used to define values that vary from one Appian environment to another. For example, if you want to generate an email body that contains the environment name, you can create a constant named ENVIRONMENT_NAME and assign it different values for DEV and TEST environments. This way, you can avoid hard-coding values in your expressions or rules, and simplify your deployment process by using automatic constant value mapping.

An index is a data structure that allows for faster retrieval of data from a table based on one or more columns. Indexes increase the performance of read operations, such as select queries, by reducing the number of records that need to be scanned. However, indexes decrease the performance of write operations, such as insert, update, and delete queries, by requiring additional work to maintain the index structure and ensure its consistency with the table data. Therefore, indexes should be used judiciously and only on columns that are frequently used in queries and have high selectivity (i.e., low number of duplicate values). 

 Creating a trigger on the database table to capture the audit trail to a table is the most efficient and has the least impact on the Appian application, because it avoids adding extra logic or calls to the Appian application, which could affect its performance and scalability. A trigger is a database object that automatically executes when a specified event occurs on a table or view. A trigger can be used to insert, update, or delete data from another table based on the changes made to the original table. References: [Triggers], [Audit Trail]

The question is about designing a process model to store the result of an expression rule for every item in a list with the lowest memory footprint. The best design for this purpose is to configure a script task to use a!foreach to iterate over each item in the list, as it allows you to execute an expression rule for each element of an array without creating multiple nodes or subprocesses in the process model. A script task is a node that executes an expression without user interaction, and a!foreach is a function that applies an expression to each element of an array and returns an array of results. The other options are not optimal for this purpose, as they either create more nodes or subprocesses in the process model, which consume more memory and resources. References:

• Script Task
• a!foreach()

The xsd:key element is not supported within an Appian CDT. This element is used to define a key constraint for an element or a group of elements. Appian does not support key constraints in CDTs, as they are not relevant for data storage or manipulation. Instead, Appian uses primary keys and foreign keys to enforce uniqueness and referential integrity in CDTs. These keys are specified using the @Id and @JoinColumn JPA annotations, respectively. References: Supported XSD Elements and JPA Annotations

 Two places to get information on process model memory usage are:

• Process monitoring tab. The process monitoring tab is a feature in the Appian Designer that allows you to monitor and manage the performance and status of process models and instances. You can use the process monitoring tab to view various metrics and statistics about your processes, such as memory usage, execution time, node count, error count, etc. You can also filter, sort, and export the data for further analysis. The process monitoring tab can help you identify which processes have the highest memory footprint and potential performance issues.
• Appian Health Check report. The Appian Health Check report is a tool that provides insights into application design patterns and performance risks in your environment. The report covers four areas of your environment: design, user experience, infrastructure, and configuration. The report also includes graphs highlighting historical trends, such as user activity, average response times, and resource utilization. The Appian Health Check report can help you identify which processes have the highest memory consumption and suggestions for mitigating them. References: Process Monitoring Tab, Understanding the Health Check Report

 A many-to-many relationship is a type of relationship where multiple records in one table are associated with multiple records in another table. To implement a many-to-many relationship, a third table is needed to store the associations between the two entities. In this case, the third table would store the employee ID and the skill ID for each pair of employee and skill. This design allows for efficient querying and updating of the data, as well as avoiding data redundancy and inconsistency. 

A connected system is an Appian object that is designed to allow you to share base URL and authentication details across multiple integrations4. A connected system represents an external system that is integrated with Appian. Connected systems allow you to easily connect to external integrations and data sources. They also allow you to deploy connection information across environments and use different connection information for each environment. You can choose from different types of connected systems, such as HTTP, SQL, or pre-built connected systems for common services like Google Drive or Salesforce5.

When creating a Web API, you need to configure two items in the Administration Console: an API key and a service account. An API key is a unique identifier that is used to authenticate requests to your Web API. You can create and manage API keys in the Administration Console under Integration > API Keys. A service account is a user account that is used to execute the Web API expression rule. You can select a service account in the Administration Console under Integration > Web APIs when you create or edit a Web API. References: [Web APIs], [API Keys], [Service Accounts]

 The data_store_details.csv log provides information about the performance of query entities. The log shows the time spent in three phases: extract, transform, and load. The extract phase is the time it takes to execute the SQL query on the database. The transform phase is the time it takes to convert the SQL result set into Appian data types. The load phase is the time it takes to return the data to the expression that invoked the query entity. To reduce the time spent in the transform phase, two possible actions are to reduce the number of columns returned from the query and to lower the batch size parameter of the query. These actions can decrease the amount of data that needs to be converted and transferred, which can improve the performance of the query entity. Therefore, the correct answers are B and D.

References:

• Query Entity Performance
• a!queryEntity() Function

The most likely root cause of the error is that the view contains a large number of rows, requiring more time to fetch the data. This can result in a timeout or an out-of-memory error. To avoid this, you can use pagination or filters to limit the number of rows returned by the view. You can also optimize the view performance by using indexes, avoiding unnecessary joins, and reducing the number of columns. References: [Views], [View Performance]