Adobe AD0-E906 Dumps

To include themountain assetsin the search results for "hiking" and ensure they show up at the top of the search, the best approach is to assign the‘hiking’ tagto these assets. By using tags, you can enhance the discoverability of the assets without modifying their titles or descriptions. Tags are indexed and have a strong influence on search results in AEM.

Tagging assetsis an efficient way to associate them with relevant topics or keywords, such as "hiking," which would improve their ranking in search results.

Option A suggests using "search boosting," which does not exist in AEM's metadata editor. Option C involves adding "hiking" to the content and status fields, which isn't the best way to influence search ranking and could clutter the metadata.

Refer toAEM documentation on metadata tagging and search optimizationfor more details.

When converting a request to a project in Adobe Workfront, it's important to ensure that custom fields and their values are correctly passed from the request form to the project form. To achieve this, you need to add the same custom field on the project form, but in this case, the calculation should be left blank because the calculated value from the request form will be passed over and does not need to be recalculated at the project level.

Same field: The field needs to be exactly the same (same internal name) so the data can flow between the request and the project during the conversion.

Blank calculation: By leaving the calculation blank, you ensure that the field will accept the value from the request without overriding it or attempting to recalculate it.

For more details on setting up custom forms in Workfront and handling calculated fields during request-to-project conversions, refer to theAdobe Workfront Form Customization Guide.

To ensure that changes in metadata in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) are synced back to Workfront for the fieldsContent TypeandEffort, the correct property assignment should map the Workfront custom form fields to the corresponding paths in the AEM JCR repository.

InOption A:

CUSTOM FORMS

is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/content-type

CUSTOM FORMS

is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/effort

This configuration ensures that changes made in AEM’scontent-typeandeffortmetadata properties will be reflected in the respective custom fields in Workfront.

Options B and C use incorrect prefixes (e.g., "DE:") and would not map the properties correctly for synchronization between Workfront and AEM.

Refer to theWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor detailed instructions on configuring metadata synchronization between AEM and Workfront.

To create watermarked renditions for onlysomeof the assets in AEM, the best approach is to create anew workflow modelthat includes theAdd Watermark process. This new workflow can be selectively applied to specific assets as needed, rather than modifying the global DAM Update Asset workflow which would affect all assets.

Selective application: By creating a custom workflow model, users can choose which assets will go through the watermarking process, providing more control and preventing unnecessary watermarking of all assets.

Option B and C suggest modifying the existing DAM Update Asset workflow, which could result in watermarking all assets, not just the desired ones, and is not flexible for specific asset selection.

Refer to AEM’sworkflow documentationfor more information on creating custom workflows and adding watermark processes.

In AEM, to limit the number of concurrent workflows running at the same time, you need to adjust theMaximum Parallel Jobssetting in the OSGI console. This setting controls how many workflow jobs can be processed simultaneously, and reducing this number will lower the load on the server by limiting the number of workflows that can run concurrently.

This setting can be found under theDay CQ Workflow - Workflow Engineconfiguration in the OSGI Web Console.

Options B and C refer to specific workflows and threads, but they do not directly address the overall system limit on concurrent workflow executions.

Refer to theAEM documentation on workflow scaling and performancefor more information on how to adjust these settings in the OSGI configuration.

For a multi-faceted holiday promotion involving several teams and unique workflows, the best way to track the associated assets is to:

Establish the holiday promotion as a Program: This allows all related projects, each corresponding to a specific marketing platform (e.g., social media, email), to be grouped under a single program for easy tracking.

Associate each project with the Program: This ensures that all related assets and workflows are linked to the holiday promotion and can be reported on collectively.

Create a Project-level Custom Form Field: This will capture specific details related to the holiday promotion for each project, allowing for more tailored reporting.

Create a Project Report filtered to the holiday promotion: This report will enable leadership and stakeholders to track the progress of all assets related to the promotion and ensure on-time delivery.

Option A involves creating a Program for each platform, which adds unnecessary complexity. Option B is similar but lacks the specific tracking of custom fields at the project level.

Refer toWorkfront’s documentation on managing Programs and custom formsfor details on setting up and reporting on large campaigns.

The requirement is to allow users to select a resource (Creative Manager) from a list of existing users in the Workfront application. The appropriate solution is to use aTypeahead fieldwith theUser object type.

Field type - Typeahead: This field allows users to start typing the name of an individual, and the system will auto-suggest matching users from the Workfront database. This is ideal for scenarios where you need to assign a specific role, like a Creative Manager, from a list of existing users.

Object type - User: By using the User object type, the field will link directly to Workfront's user directory, ensuring that the selection is limited to valid, active resources in the system.

This combination of field and object type is the most efficient for assigning roles based on existing users, as it prevents errors and ensures data consistency by utilizing Workfront’s internal user directory.

Options B and C are not suitable because acalculated fieldis not required, andcheckboxesdo not allow selection from a list of user names.

For further reference, consult theCustom FieldsandTypeahead Fieldssections in Workfront’s documentation, which outline how to configure these fields to enable user selection from the organization’s resource pool.

TheAuthorpermission role is necessary for the design team members who need toedit the proofsbefore they are sent for review by legal and financial teams. This role allows them to make changes directly to the proof and upload new versions, which is essential for their work in this multi-stage automated workflow.

Author role: Grants permission to edit and manage the proof, which includes uploading new versions and making changes to the existing proof content.

Options B (Reviewer) and C (Approver) are more restrictive roles that do not allow for editing proofs.

Refer toWorkfront Proofing roles and permissions documentationfor more information on the different proof roles.

When configuring metadata mapping between Adobe Workfront custom form fields and Adobe Experience Manager metadata properties, you can useIssueandDocumentcustom forms to define these mappings. These types of forms are commonly used for tracking and managing work items and documents, both of which need to have their metadata synchronized between the two systems.

Issue custom forms: Used for tracking work requests, such as issues or tasks.

Document custom forms: Specifically used for managing metadata related to documents, which can be mapped directly to AEM assets.

Options C (Portfolio) and D (Program) are not typically used for metadata mapping related to assets or documents.

Refer toWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor more information on mapping custom forms to AEM metadata properties.