Free and Premium ACAMS Advanced-CAMS-Audit Dumps Questions Answers

Critical Impact:

Absence of CDD processes during product launch leaves the institution exposed to onboarding high-risk customers without proper risk assessment​​.

Guidelines and Compliance:

FATF standards emphasize embedding CDD in all stages of customer interaction to mitigate ML/TF risks​​.

=========================

Definition of Residual Risk:

Residual risk is the risk that remains after controls are implemented to mitigate inherent risks.

It reflects the effectiveness of controls and highlights areas requiring further attention.

Relevance in Risk Management:

Evaluating residual risk helps determine whether existing controls adequately address the identified risks.

CAMS-Audit Best Practices:

Auditors must assess residual risk as part of the broader risk management framework to ensure regulatory compliance and operational resilience​​.

Reason for Overvaluation/Undervaluation:

This technique is often used in trade-based money laundering to transfer funds or value disguised as legitimate trade transactions.

Auditor's Responsibility:

Auditors must ensure such discrepancies are detected, escalated, and adequately addressed to prevent money laundering​​.

CAMS-Audit Insight:

Advanced CAMS-Audit emphasizes vigilance in trade finance as a high-risk area for money laundering activities​​.

A significant error in an audit report undermines the credibility of the findings. The appropriate action is to recall the report, reassess the error, and submit an accurate report to stakeholders. This ensures integrity and compliance with audit standards​​.

Product Risk: Certain products (e.g., high-value transfers, anonymous payment systems) inherently carry higher AML risks and require tailored risk mitigation measures.

Customer Risk: Understanding the risk profile of customers, including PEPs and high-net-worth individuals, is critical to assessing exposure and implementing risk-based approaches.

Both factors are core components in AML risk assessments, as highlighted in CAMS-Audit materials and FATF standards​​​.

Selecting an Audit Firm:

The scope and expertise of the audit firm must align with the institution's risk profile and regulatory requirements to ensure the audit's effectiveness.

Best Practices in Outsourced Audits:

Properly scoping and selecting auditors with relevant AML/CFT experience ensures compliance and minimizes operational risks.

CAMS-Audit Guidance:

Advanced CAMS-Audit emphasizes the importance of tailoring audit scopes and selecting experienced auditors for outsourced engagements​​.

Recommended Action:

Re-screening ensures compliance with sanctions and identifies potential violations retrospectively. This is a critical regulatory requirement for addressing gaps in screening coverage​​.

FATF and Basel Guidelines:

Emphasize retrospective reviews in cases of system lapses to maintain the integrity of the sanctions compliance program​​.

A:Regularly updating lists of high- and medium-risk countries ensures that customer risk profiles align with the most current geopolitical and economic risks​​.

E:Periodic updates to customer risk profiles, based on their assigned risk level, are critical for maintaining an accurate and dynamic risk assessment system​​.

Key Objectives of Issue Confirmation:

Findings need to be clearly articulated and assigned to ensure accountability and actionable remediation​​.

Accurate documentation ensures that facts are not disputed and remediation can proceed efficiently.

Irrelevant Options:

B:Additional remediation is a later step in the issue resolution process.

D and E:Tracking and pre-exam validation relate to follow-up stages, not the initial confirmation step.

Reporting to the Head Office Board Committee:

Independent testing reports must be submitted to the highest governance body to ensure proper oversight and alignment with global AML/CFT policies.

This ensures that findings are addressed at the appropriate organizational level.

CAMS-Audit and FATF Guidelines:

Governance frameworks outlined in CAMS-Audit and FATF recommendations emphasize the importance of board-level oversight for critical compliance functions​​

Exemptions from OFAC Regulations:

Non-US citizens residing in the US are typically subject to OFAC regulations unless explicitly exempted. However, understanding exemptions is vital for sanctions compliance.

Auditor's Role in Sanctions Compliance:

Auditors must review whether the entity’s compliance program correctly identifies and exempts individuals or entities as per OFAC guidelines.

CAMS-Audit Reference:

CAMS-Audit recommends thorough reviews of sanctions compliance programs, focusing on adherence to OFAC requirements and exemptions​​.

Conditions for Closing Audit Findings:

Findings can only be closed when the corrective actions identified in response to the audit findings are implemented and verified as effective.

This includes addressing underlying risks and documenting the resolution process.

CAMS-Audit Best Practices:

The audit process must ensure that all follow-up actions mitigate the identified risks, aligning with regulatory and operational standards​​.

Testing Internal Controls:

C. Gap Analysis: Ensures policies are compliant with local regulations and address identified risks​​.

D. Sample Testing: Verifies that processes are effectively implemented in practice for both new and existing customers​​.

Enhanced due diligence is necessary to identify potential risks associated with high-value transactions such as art sales, a known method for money laundering.

CAMS-Audit guidelines recommend updating client records with findings to maintain transparency and prepare for regulatory scrutiny​​.

This approach ensures compliance with due diligence requirements and mitigates reputational and financial crime risks.

Audits are primarily designed to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of controls within a risk management framework. This includes assessing whether the controls are properly designed and functioning to mitigate identified risks effectively.

CAMS-Audit guidance highlights the critical role of controls in ensuring compliance with AML/CFT regulations and managing operational risks​​.

AML Compliance Policy Elements:

A. Record Keeping: Essential for regulatory compliance, ensuring accurate data retention for audits and investigations​​.

B. Suspicious Activity Reporting: A core AML requirement, mandated by FATF recommendations to identify and report suspicious transactions​​.

E. Training Requirements: Ensures staff understand their AML obligations, as highlighted in Basel and FATF guidelines​​.

In follow-up strategies, the focus should be on ensuring accountability and tracking progress. Establishing a target completion date and regularly updating the status of remedial actions ensures timely and effective resolution of deficiencies.

CAMS-Audit emphasizes tracking timelines and milestones for corrective actions to align with regulatory expectations and internal compliance frameworks​​.

Customer Identification Program (CIP) Requirements:

Account opening procedures define the baseline for customer identification, aligning with FATF Recommendation 10 on CDD​​.

Presentation of Exceptions:

Auditors must analyze the exceptions based on their likelihood of occurrence and potential impact on compliance and operational risks before presenting findings to the auditee​​.

Supporting Standards:

Basel and FATF emphasize prioritizing findings based on their materiality and risk implications during the audit process​.

Deficiency in Reporting Metrics:

AML compliance frameworks require metrics to track trends and unusual patterns in suspicious activity reports (SARs). A lack of such metrics is a deficiency that undermines monitoring and oversight​​.

Why This is the Appropriate Step:

Identifying and documenting deficiencies ensures accountability and facilitates corrective action, aligning with AML audit standards.

Steps to Assess the External Review Report:

Validate the scope, methodology, and findings of the external review to determine its adequacy and reliability.

Identify any gaps or areas that require additional scrutiny by internal audit.

Rationale for Review Instead of Reliance:

Relying solely on external reviews without validation risks overlooking key compliance deficiencies. Internal audit must establish an independent assessment to corroborate findings​​.

CAMS-Audit Recommendations:

CAMS-Audit stresses the importance of critical evaluation of third-party reports and ensuring internal audit findings align with organizational compliance priorities​​

Capabilities of CAAT:

CAAT provides comprehensive data access, allowing auditors to review all customer data over extended periods, unlike traditional methods that rely on sampling​​.

Irrelevant Options:

A:Limited samples are more typical of traditional methods.

B:Data incorporated in the warehouse should not be changeable as it would undermine audit integrity.

D:CAAT can be customized for specific audit needs.

Testing Operating Effectiveness:

Operating effectiveness testing evaluates whether controls and systems are functioning as intended on a daily basis, including the accuracy and reliability of automated validation processes.

Relevance to Data Validation:

The auditor’s role in this scenario ensures that the data flowing into the monitoring software is accurate and aligned with operational requirements, reflecting day-to-day effectiveness.

CAMS-Audit Emphasis:

The emphasis on ongoing operational validation is consistent with Advanced CAMS-Audit practices, which stress continuous monitoring of AML system effectiveness​​.

C:The purpose and intended nature of the business relationship are fundamental elements of customer due diligence (CDD) and should be reviewed in the risk assessment process to understand the rationale behind the customer's activities and their alignment with expected patterns​​.

D:Identifying and verifying the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) is a core principle of the KYC process to ensure transparency and mitigate risks related to hidden ownership or illicit activities​​.

Enhancements to the CRA Process:

Risk Factors:Identify and document specific risk indicators for transparency and consistent assessment. This ensures alignment with the risk-based approach advocated by FATF​​.

Type of Customer:Differentiating customer types (trust, company, individual) is critical for tailoring due diligence measures to the unique risks associated with each type​​.

Residence (Country):Tracking customer jurisdiction ensures risk assessments reflect geopolitical and regulatory changes, fulfilling FATF compliance expectations​​.

Role of Additional Fields in Compliance:

These fields enhance traceability, accountability, and risk profiling, ensuring the CRA process is comprehensive and meets regulatory standards.

Advanced CAMS-Audit Guidance:

Documentation must be detailed and periodically reviewed to address evolving AML risks effectively, as recommended by CAMS-Audit guidelines​​.

Distinguishing General and Specific Licenses:

Ageneral licensepermits predefined categories of transactions without individual approval.

Aspecific licenseis issued for unique transactions based on a written application evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

OFAC Guidance:

Auditors should verify that transactions routed through sanctioned countries align with the licenses and confirm appropriate documentation for compliance​​.

Key Assessment Factors for AML Structure Changes:

Staffing levels ensure the AML department has adequate resources to meet its obligations, especially in light of new responsibilities or organizational changes​​.

Irrelevant Options:

A:Interaction with internal audit is important but not directly tied to structural changes.

C:Changes in board members are governance-related, not operational AML concerns.

D:Reporting lines are relevant but secondary to resource adequacy.