OMG OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The diagram shows a package Pckg that includes two classes G and H with a one-to-many association between them. The multiplicity '1..5' near class G on the 'gh' association end suggests that for each H object, there should be between 1 to 5 associated G objects. However, the '*' (multiplicity many) near class H on the 'gh' association end indicates that a G object can be associated with zero or more H objects. This implies that it's possible to have a G object that is not associated with any H object.

References:

• UML 2.x Superstructure Specification: Multiplicity notations and association rules are clearly defined in the UML specifications, which detail the semantics of multiplicities and their implications for object association.
• UML 2.x Infrastructure Specification: Further explains the basic constructs of the UML metamodel, which underpin the interpretation of multiplicities in associations.

In UML 2, a structured class can have internal parts, which are depicted using 'parts' or 'roles' within the class diagram. These internal parts are used to show the composition of the class in terms of contained classes or components. In the context of the question, the structured class named 'System' contains two parts named 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2'.

Option C is the equivalent definition of 'System' in terms of UML 2 notation for several reasons:

• It represents the structured class 'System' with internal parts correctly labeled as 's1:Subsystem1' and 's2:Subsystem2-[ ]', which indicates the role names 's1' and 's2' followed by the class type 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2' respectively. The notation '1..*' after 's2:Subsystem2-[ ]' suggests a multiplicity, meaning that there can be one or many instances of 'Subsystem2' associated with 'System'.
• The compartmentalization within the structured class is indicative of the composition of the 'System', showing that 'Subsystem1' and 'Subsystem2' are integral parts of the 'System'.
• The notation conforms to the standard UML 2 representation for composite structures, as described in the UML 2 Superstructure Specification, where a class can be broken down into its constituent parts within the class rectangle.

This information is verified against the UML 2 Superstructure Specification, which is the authoritative source for UML notation and semantics. Particularly, this aligns with section 9.3.5 on Composite Structures Diagrams, which details the graphical notation for parts and roles within a structured class.

In UML, a Class is a template that defines the structure and behavior of objects, whereas a DataType is a type of classifier which specifies a domain of values without identity. Operations (such as money transfers and withdrawals) are behaviors that change the state of an object and, therefore, are defined in Classes rather than DataTypes. This suggests that accounts, which require operations to transfer and withdraw money, should be modeled as Classes.

References:

• UML 2.x Superstructure Specification: Provides definitions for Classes and DataTypes, and details the circumstances under which each should be used. It specifically states that Classes can have operations while DataTypes cannot.
• UML 2.x Infrastructure Specification: This foundational document provides an in-depth explanation of UML modeling constructs, supporting the use of Classes when operations are needed to manage an object's state.