OMG OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The diagram shows a package Pckg that includes two classes G and H with a one-to-many association between them. The multiplicity '1..5' near class G on the 'gh' association end suggests that for each H object, there should be between 1 to 5 associated G objects. However, the '*' (multiplicity many) near class H on the 'gh' association end indicates that a G object can be associated with zero or more H objects. This implies that it's possible to have a G object that is not associated with any H object.

References:

• UML 2.x Superstructure Specification: Multiplicity notations and association rules are clearly defined in the UML specifications, which detail the semantics of multiplicities and their implications for object association.
• UML 2.x Infrastructure Specification: Further explains the basic constructs of the UML metamodel, which underpin the interpretation of multiplicities in associations.

The provided image depicts a state machine fragment containing an invalid transition. The state machine has a single state labeled "S1" with an incoming and outgoing transition labeled "e".

According to the UML 2 Foundation documents, a transition in a state machine cannot originate from and target the same state. This type of loopback transition within a single state is not permitted.

Here's a breakdown of why other options are incorrect:

• Option A (A transition requires a trigger or guard) is not necessarily true. Transitions can exist without explicit triggers or guards, although their presence is often recommended for clarity and modeling complex behavior.
• Option B (A guard condition is not allowed on the initial transition) is valid. Guard conditions are indeed not allowed on the initial transition of a state machine, but the issue in the diagram is the loopback, not the presence or absence of a guard.
• Option C (A trigger is not allowed on the transition to the final state) is not always true. Final states can have outgoing transitions with triggers under specific circumstances (e.g., for hierarchical state machines). However, the error here concerns the loopback nature of the transition.

References:

• UML Specification (Superstructure) Version 2.5.1, specifically sections covering state transitions (Section 14.2.3.7). You can find it on the OMG website: https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1

In UML, when a class diagram shows an operation with a parameter that has a multiplicity of [0..1], it indicates that the parameter is optional. The range [0..1] means that the parameter can have 0 or 1 occurrence. This does not mean it accepts a collection, nor does it specify the values it accepts (it specifies how many times the parameter can occur).

The correct interpretation of the parameterpar1 : Integer [0..1]is:

A. It is optional.

B is incorrect because the multiplicity [0..1] does not mean a collection of items; rather, it signifies that the parameter can be omitted or present, but not multiple times. C is incorrect because the multiplicity [0..1] does not constrain the values to 0 or 1; it refers to the number of instances of the parameter. D is incorrect because [0..1] is not a range of values but a range of occurrences or instances of the parameter.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. It is optional.