ISC CISSP Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The main reason that system re-certification and re-accreditation are needed is to verify that the security protection of the system remains acceptable to the organizational security policy, especially after significant changes or updates to the system. Re-certification is the process of reviewing and testing the security controls of the system to ensure that they are still effective and compliant with the security policy. Re-accreditation is the process of authorizing the system to operate based on the results of the re-certification. The other options are not the main reason for system re-certification and re-accreditation, as they either do not relate to the security protection of the system (A and D), or do not involve re-certification and re-accreditation (B). References: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 10, page 633; Official (ISC)2 CISSP CBK Reference, Fifth Edition, Chapter 10, page 695.

A detection control is a type of control that identifies and reports the occurrence of an unwanted event, such as a violation of a policy or a threshold. A detection control does not prevent or correct the event, but rather alerts the appropriate personnel or system to take action34. References: 3: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1, page 294: CISSP For Dummies, 7th Edition, Chapter 1, page 21.

The best way to minimize the risk of inheriting outsourcing contracts that do not adhere to the current security requirements is to verify all contracts before a merger occurs. This means that the security professionals involved in the merger should review and assess the security clauses, standards, and practices of the contracts of the merging parties, and identify any gaps, conflicts, or inconsistencies with the current security requirements. This can help to ensure that the outsourcing contracts are aligned with the security objectives, policies, and regulations of the merged organization, and that the security risks and responsibilities are clearly defined and agreed upon by all parties. Verifying all contracts before a merger occurs can also help to avoid any legal, financial, or operational issues that may arise from non-compliance or breach of contract. Defining additional security controls directly after the merger, including a procurement officer in the merger team, and assigning a compliance officer to review the merger conditions are all possible ways to minimize the risk of inheriting outsourcing contracts that do not adhere to the current security requirements, but they are not as effective as verifying all contracts before a merger occurs. Defining additional security controls directly after the merger may be too late, as the outsourcing contracts may already be in effect and may not be easily modified or terminated. Including a procurement officer in the merger team may be helpful, as the procurement officer can oversee the contracting process and ensure that the security requirements are met, but the procurement officer may not have the technical expertise or authority to verify the security clauses, standards, and practices of the contracts. Assigning a compliance officer to review the merger conditions may be useful, as the compliance officer can monitor and audit the compliance status and performance of the outsourcing contracts, but the compliance officer may not have the power or influence to change or enforce the security requirements of the contracts.