JN0-351 Exam Dumps : Enterprise Routing and Switching Specialist (JNCIS-ENT)

 In OSPF, a DR (Designated Router) and a BDR (Backup Designated Router) are elected on each multi-access network, such as Ethernet or Frame Relay. The DR and BDR are responsible for exchanging routing information with other routers on the same network segment. The election is based on two criteria: the OSPF priority and the router ID. The router with the highest priority becomes the DR, and the router with the second-highest priority becomes the BDR. If the priorities are equal, the router with the highest router ID becomes the DR, and the router with the second-highest router ID becomes the BDR. The default priority is 1, and the router ID is either manually configured or derived from the highest IP address on any interface12.

In this scenario, R1 has a priority of 32 and a router ID of 192.168.1.2, and R2 has a priority of 64 and a router ID of 192.168.1.1. Since R2 has a higher priority than R1, it will become the BDR. The router ID does not matter in this case, because the priority is different. Therefore, the correct answer is C.

The other options are not correct because:

A. At least two routers are required for a DR/BDR election, not three2.

B. Router IDs do not have to match for an adjacency to form, they just have to be unique3.

D. R1 will not be the BDR, because it has a lower priority than R212.

A. On R1, enable Level 1 on the ge-0/0/1 interface.  In IS-IS, both levels (Level 1 and Level 2) are enabled by default when you enable IS-IS on an interface 1 .  Level 1 systems route within an area 2 .  If the destination is outside an area, Level 1 systems route toward a Level 2 system 2 . Therefore, enabling Level 1 on the ge-0/0/1 interface on R1 would allow packets to reach from R1 to R3.

D. On R3 enable Level 1 on the ge-0/0/4 interface Similarly, enabling Level 1 on the ge-0/0/4 interface on R3 would allow packets to reach from R1 to R3.

These explanations are based on the IS-IS configuration documents and learning resources available at Juniper Networks 1  and Cisco 3 4 .

An aggregate route is a route that summarizes multiple more specific routes into a single route advertisement. For example, an aggregate route to 10.0.0.0/8 can represent many routes to 10.x.x.x/24 subnets. An aggregate route has several purposes, such as:

To decrease the number of route advertisements: By consolidating multiple routes into one, an aggregate route reduces the size of the routing table and the amount of routing updates that need to be exchanged between routers. This can improve the scalability and efficiency of the network12.

To hide internal routes from external peers: By advertising only the aggregate route and not the more specific routes, an aggregate route can provide a level of abstraction and security for the internal network topology. This can prevent external peers from knowing the details of the internal routes and avoid potential attacks or misconfigurations13.

The other options are not correct because:

C. To allow external peers to see internal routes: This is the opposite of what an aggregate route does. An aggregate route hides the internal routes from external peers, not exposes them13.

D. To increase the number of route advertisements: This is also the opposite of what an aggregate route does. An aggregate route decreases the number of route advertisements, not increases them12.