JN0-351 Exam Dumps : Enterprise Routing and Switching Specialist (JNCIS-ENT)

The exhibit shows the configuration of RSTP on EX-4, which has the command  force-version stp .  This command forces the switch to use the legacy STP protocol instead of RSTP, even though the switch supports RSTP 1 .  This means that EX-4 will not be able to take advantage of the faster convergence and enhanced features of RSTP, such as edge ports, link type, and proposal/agreement sequence 2 .

The other switches in the network are likely to be running RSTP, as it is the default protocol for EX Series switches 3 . Therefore, there will be a compatibility issue between EX-4 and the other switches, which will result in longer convergence times and suboptimal performance.  The switch will also generate a warning message that says “Warning: STP version mismatch with neighbor” when it receives a BPDU from a RSTP neighbor 1 .

To solve this problem, the force-version command must be removed from EX-4, so that it can run RSTP natively and interoperate with the other switches in the network. This will enable faster convergence and better stability for the network topology.  To remove the command, you can use the  delete protocols rstp force-version  command in configuration mode 1 .

Default BGP keepalive timer in Junos is 30 seconds

The default keepalive time for BGP is 30 seconds, which means that BGP peers send keepalive messages to each other every 30 seconds to verify the liveness of the BGP session. If no keepalive message is received from a peer within the hold time, which is 90 seconds by default, the peer is considered to be unavailable and the BGP session is closed. The keepalive time and the hold time can be configured manually for each BGP peer or peer group, but they must match on both ends of the BGP session. The keepalive time should be one third of the hold time for optimal performance. Therefore, option C is correct and the other options are incorrect. References:  BGP keepalive messages and hold time - Juniper Networks

Option A is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce the convergence time . This is because changes in one area do not affect other areas, so fewer routers need to run the SPF algorithm in response to a change.

Option D is correct. Creating multiple areas in OSPF can help to reduce Link State Advertisement (LSA) flooding across the network. This is because LSAs are not flooded out of their area of origin.