312-38 Exam Dumps : Certified Network Defender (CND)

Phishing attempts that target users with fake usage bills from a cloud provider are examples of a cloud to user attack surface. This type of attack surface refers to the potential vulnerabilities and entry points that exist between the cloud service provider and the user. In this scenario, the attacker is exploiting the trust relationship between the user and the cloud service provider by presenting a fraudulent bill, hoping the user will reveal sensitive information or make a payment based on the fake bill.

References: The explanation is consistent with the Certified Network Defender (CND) curriculum, which includes understanding various attack surfaces, including cloud and user-related surfaces, and how they can be exploited through phishing and other social engineering attacks12.

 The correct Wireshark filter to detect a SYN/FIN DDoS attempt is tcp.flags==0X029. This filter is designed to capture packets where both the SYN and FIN flags are set, which is an unusual combination and indicative of a SYN/FIN attack. In a typical three-way TCP handshake, the SYN and FIN flags are not set in the same TCP segment. A SYN flag is used to initiate a connection, and a FIN flag is used to politely close a connection. Therefore, seeing both flags set in the same packet suggests a possible SYN/FIN DDoS attack.

References: The answer is based on the standard behavior of TCP flags in network communications and the detection of anomalous flag combinations that signify potential DDoS attacks. While specific references to the EC-Council’s Certified Network Defender (CND) course materials cannot be provided here, the explanation aligns with the general knowledge of network security practices and the use of Wireshark for network analysis.

 In the context of incident response methodology, the last step is typically referred to as ‘Post-Incident Activity’ or ‘Lessons Learned’. This step involves reviewing the incident to understand what happened, how it was handled, and how similar incidents can be prevented or mitigated in the future. It’s a critical phase where the organization can improve its security posture and response strategies. The follow-up step ensures that any residual risk is addressed, and that all documentation is completed. It also provides an opportunity for the incident response team to reflect on their actions and improve the incident handling plan for future responses.

References: The importance of the follow-up step as the last phase in the incident response methodology is supported by well-respected frameworks developed by NIST and SANS, which outline ‘Post-Incident Activity’ or ‘Lessons Learned’ as the final step123. These steps align with the objectives and documents of the EC-Council’s Certified Network Defender (CND) program.