300-420 Exam Dumps : Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks (ENSLD) v1.1

The selected configuration sets are correct because the addressing plan must use VLSM to maximize subnets and minimize wasted addresses. Customer A requires 125 hosts, so it needs a /25 subnet, which provides 126 usable host addresses. Customer D requires 62 hosts, so it needs a /26 subnet, which provides 62 usable addresses exactly. Point-to-point or small WAN links B, C, and E should use the smallest appropriate link subnets shown in the exhibit, typically /30 for IPv4 point-to-point links when two usable addresses are required. A correct plan must allocate the largest blocks first, align every subnet on the proper boundary, avoid overlap, and avoid assigning a larger-than-needed subnet to any customer or link. Options A and C are the two valid combinations that satisfy those rules in the exhibit. Any option that places a /25 or /26 on the wrong boundary, overlaps with another block, or wastes larger subnets on links would fail the design objective. Reference topics: IPv4 VLSM, subnet boundary alignment, host capacity planning, point-to-point addressing, route summarization readiness.

Forward error correction and quality of service are the two listed techniques that directly improve application experience in a Cisco SD-WAN design. Forward error correction protects selected application traffic by sending recovery information so packet loss can be corrected without waiting for retransmission. That is especially useful for real-time voice and video traffic, where retransmission delay can degrade quality. QoS improves application treatment by classifying, marking, queuing, shaping, and prioritizing traffic according to business intent and application sensitivity. Cisco SD-WAN designs commonly combine application-aware routing, QoS, and loss-mitigation features to keep critical traffic on the best path and preserve service quality during congestion or impairment. A stateful firewall, AMP, and Cisco Umbrella improve security posture, but they do not primarily improve application experience in the forwarding-quality sense asked by the question. They may protect applications, but they do not directly address loss, delay, jitter, and congestion treatment. Therefore, FEC and QoS are the best answers. Reference topics: Cisco SD-WAN application experience, FEC, QoS, loss mitigation, real-time traffic handling.

BIDIR-PIM is the correct multicast solution for interactive many-to-many communication with many sources when source trees must not be used. Bidirectional PIM is specifically designed for applications where receivers can also be senders and where the number of sources can grow without creating per-source multicast state throughout the network. Instead of building shortest-path trees for each source, BIDIR-PIM uses a shared tree rooted at the rendezvous point and forwards traffic bidirectionally along that tree. This reduces multicast routing-table growth and control-plane churn in environments with many active sources. PIM dense mode is not appropriate because it floods and prunes traffic and is inefficient at scale. Any-source multicast with PIM-SM may create source trees, which violates the requirement. MSDP is used to exchange source information between PIM-SM domains and is not itself the forwarding mode for this campus or WAN multicast design. Reference topics: BIDIR-PIM, many-to-many multicast, shared tree, multicast source scaling, PIM design.