Databricks Databricks-Certified-Professional-Data-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Partitioning a Delta Lake table is a strategy used to improve query performance by dividing the table into distinct segments based on the values of a specific column. This approach allows queries to scan only the relevant partitions, thereby reducing the amount of data read and enhancing performance.

Considerations for Choosing a Partition Column:

Cardinality: Columns with high cardinality (i.e., a large number of unique values) are generally poor choices for partitioning. High cardinality can lead to a large number of small partitions, which can degrade performance.

Query Patterns: The partition column should align with common query filters. If queries frequently filter data based on a particular column, partitioning by that column can be beneficial.

Partition Size: Each partition should ideally contain at least 1 GB of data. This ensures that partitions are neither too small (leading to too many partitions) nor too large (negating the benefits of partitioning).

Evaluation of Columns:

date:

Cardinality: Typically low, especially if data spans over days, months, or years.

Query Patterns: Many analytical queries filter data based on date ranges.

Partition Size: Likely to meet the 1 GB threshold per partition, depending on data volume.

user_id:

Cardinality: High, as each user has a unique ID.

Query Patterns: While some queries might filter by user_id, the high cardinality makes it unsuitable for partitioning.

Partition Size: Partitions could be too small, leading to inefficiencies.

post_id:

Cardinality: Extremely high, with each post having a unique ID.

Query Patterns: Unlikely to be used for filtering large datasets.

Partition Size: Each partition would be very small, resulting in a large number of partitions.

post_time:

Cardinality: High, especially if it includes exact timestamps.

Query Patterns: Queries might filter by time, but the high cardinality poses challenges.

Partition Size: Similar to user_id, partitions could be too small.

Conclusion:

Given the considerations, the date column is the most suitable candidate for partitioning. It has low cardinality, aligns with common query patterns, and is likely to result in appropriately sized partitions.

Partitioning a Delta Lake table improves query performance by organizing data into partitions based on the values of a column. In the given schema, the date column is a good candidate for partitioning for several reasons:

Time-Based Queries: If queries frequently filter or group by date, partitioning by the date column can significantly improve performance by limiting the amount of data scanned.

Granularity: The date column likely has a granularity that leads to a reasonable number of partitions (not too many and not too few). This balance is important for optimizing both read and write performance.

Data Skew: Other columns like post_id or user_id might lead to uneven partition sizes (data skew), which can negatively impact performance.

Partitioning by post_time could also be considered, but typically date is preferred due to its more manageable granularity.

This is the correct answer because it exemplifies best practices for implementing this system. By isolating tables in separate databases based on data quality tiers, such as bronze, silver, and gold, the data engineering team can achieve several benefits. First, they can easily manage permissions for different users and groups through database ACLs, which allow granting or revoking access to databases, tables, or views. Second, they can physically separate the default storage locations for managed tables in each database, which can improve performance and reduce costs. Third, they can provide a clear and consistent naming convention for the tables in each database, which can improve discoverability and usability. Verified References: [Databricks Certified Data Engineer Professional], under “Lakehouse” section; Databricks Documentation, under “Database object privileges” section.