Which of the following is NOT a component of the ISO/IEC 27032 framework?
What is a single sign-on (SSO)?
Scenario 7:Established in 2005 in Arizona, the US. Hitec is one of The leading online retail companies. It Is especially known for electronic devices, such as televisions, telephones, and laptops. Hitec strives to continually enhance customer satisfaction and optimize its technologyplatforms and applications. the company's website and mobile application provide a range of features designed to simplify the online shopping experience, including customized product recommendations and a user-friendly search engine. The system enables customers to easily track the progress of their orders made through any of Hitec's platforms, in addition. Hitec employs a comprehensive customer management system to collect and manage customer information, including payment history, order details, and individual preferences.
Recently. Hitec had to deal with a serious cybersecurity incident that resulted in a data breach. Following numerous customer complaints about the malfunctioning of the ordering system. Hitec's engineers initiated an investigation into their network. The investigation unveiled multiple instances of unauthorized access by two distinct attackers. They gamed access sensitive customer information, such as credit card numbers and login credentials. Instead of promptly sharing information about the detected threats with other companies in the cybersecurity alliance and asking for help, Hitec chose to rely solely on its own detection and response capabilities. After resolving the incident, the company publicly acknowledged falling victim to a data breach. However, it refrained from disclosing specific details regarding the impact it had on its customers
Two weeks after the cyberattack, another retail company, Buyent, made an announcement regarding their successful prevention of a similar data breach unlike Hitec. Buyent took a transparent approach by providing detailed insights into the attacker's methods and the step-by-step procedures they employed to mitigate the attack. As both companies were part of the same cybersecurity alliance, Buyent willingly shared the requested information in accordance with their established information sharing and coordination framework, ensuring that any personal data shared was processed in a manner that prevented direct attribution to specific data subjects. This Involved utilizing additional information, which was kepi separately and secured through technical and organizational measures.
To ensure secure transmission. Buyent sent links that required a password for access, protecting the encrypted files sent to Hitec These files included comprehensive guidelines and approaches adopted hy Buyent to effectively detect and respond to cybersecurity events.
Upon careful analysis of the provided Information. Hitec concluded that their previous attack was primarily attributed to weaknesses in their detection capabilities in response. Hitec made strategic changes to their procedures. They implemented the utilization of Darknet as a technical approach to detect suspicious and malicious network activities. Furthermore, Hitec established a new security policy which required regular network and system testing By implementing these controls. Hilec aimed to strengthen Us ability to identify system vulnerabilities and threats, thereby boosting the overall cybersecurity defense.
Lastly, Hitec decided to contract a training provider to conduct cybersecurity training for its employees. They agreed to provide a training session that covered essential cybersecurity practices applicable to all staff, regardless of their roles within the company As the agreed upon training date approached, the training provider requested the necessary documentation from Hitec. Including the cybersecurity policy and specific examples related to the practices or guidelines employed by the company. After Hitec did not deliver the requested resources, the training provider refused to conduct the training session.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Buyent shared detailed Information related to the cyberattack with another retail company. Is this a good practice?
Scenario 5:Pilotron is a large manufacturer known for its electric vehicles that use renewable energy. One of Its objectives Is 10 make the world a cleaner place by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels. In addition to electric vehicles, Pilotron also offers solar roof and advanced battery technology, all manufactured at its factory in Bastogne. Belgium. As one of the most Innovative manufacturers in Europe, Pilotron invests heavily in research and development to create unique components, such asmotors, sensors, and batteries. In addillon, it places a strong emphasis on delivering high-quality products, and requires all employees to undergo an intensive onboarding program that includes hands-on training.
Pilotron did not prioritize the establishment of a cybersecurity program to protect its information. This became evident when a frustrated employee took advantage of the company's lack of cybersecurity measures. The employee was aware that Pilotron's existing security measures could easily be evaded The company became aware of the incident after five weeks, when a sudden surge in network data transfer raised suspicions upon investigation. Pilotron discovered that the employee had multiple requests for access to software development resources that were unrelated to their daily tasks By using a false user name and avoiding the implemented cybersecurity controls, the employee directly modified the code of one of Pilotron's products. This unauthorized code change enabled the employee to transfer highly sensitive data to external parties
Knowing that insider threats pose a significant risk and the existing security controls were ineffective. Pilotron decided to shift its cybersecurity focus toward proactive detection and prevention strategies. It implemented a security software that detects unusual access patterns, large data upload, and credential abuse Additionally, Pilotron recognized the need to help improve the security of Its systems by Isolating devices (PCs. servers) on the opposite sides of a firewall.
The company also implemented an identity management solution to ensure the verification of Individuals requesting access. It decided to implement a mechanism that ensured only authorized individuals can access sensitive systems and data. In addition to the traditional username and password, employees were now required to provide a unique personal identifier, such as a fingerprint, as well as a one-time verification code generated through a mobile app
Moreover, in order to enhance security measures and gain the benefits of cloud computing, Pilotron decided to leverage cloud based services. A kiv factor in Pilotroo's decision was the capability to construct and oversee its personalized Infrastructure Instead of depending on pre-set platforms or software applications, the company could craft its virtualized environments. The significant level of customization is of utmost importance to Pilotron since it enables adjusting its infrastructure to align with the specific requirements of its projects and clients.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
What type of data threat was Pitotron subject to? Refer to scenario 5
Copyright © 2014-2024 CertsTopics. All Rights Reserved
