ARA-R01 Exam Dumps : SnowPro Advanced: Architect Recertification Exam

• The architecture in the image shows a Snowflake data platform with two databases, DB1 and DB2, and two schemas, SH1 and SH2. DB1 contains a table TBL1 and a stage STAGE1. DB2 contains a table TBL2. The image also shows a snippet of code written in SQL language that copies data from STAGE1 to TBL2 using a file format FF PIPE 1.
• To copy data from DB1 to TBL2, there are two possible options among the choices given:

SQLAI-generated code. Review and use carefully. More info on FAQ.

use database DB2;

use schema SH2;

create stage EXT_STAGE1

url = @DB1.SH1.STAGE1;

• uk.co.certification.simulator.questionpool.PList@18276980

SQLAI-generated code. Review and use carefully. More info on FAQ.

copy into TBL2

from @EXT_STAGE1

file format = (format name = DB1.SH1.FF PIPE 1);

• uk.co.certification.simulator.questionpool.PList@18276cf0

SQLAI-generated code. Review and use carefully. More info on FAQ.

use database DB2;

use schema SH2;

insert into TBL2

select * from DB1.SH1.TBL1;

• The other options are not valid because:

References:

• 1: CREATE STAGE | Snowflake Documentation
• 2: COPY INTO table | Snowflake Documentation
• 3: Cross-database Queries | Snowflake Documentation

The most efficient way to load data from the vendor into Snowflake is to create an external stage on Google Cloud Storage and use the external table to load the data into Snowflake (Option B). This way, you can avoid copying or moving the data across different cloud platforms, which can incur additional costs and latency. You can also leverage the external table feature to query the data directly from Google Cloud Storage without loading it into Snowflake tables, which can save storage space and improve performance. Option A is not efficient because it requires the vendor to create a Snowflake account and a data share, which can be complicated and costly. Option C is not efficient because it involves copying the data from Google Cloud Storage to Azure Blob storage using external tools, which can be slow and expensive. Option D is not efficient because it requires creating a Snowflake account in the Google Cloud Platform (GCP), ingesting data into this account, and using data replication to move the data from GCP to Azure, which can be complex and time-consuming. References: The answer can be verified from Snowflake’s official documentation on external stages and external tables available on their website. Here are some relevant links:

• Using External Stages | Snowflake Documentation
• Using External Tables | Snowflake Documentation
• Loading Data from a Stage | Snowflake Documentation

The best way to meet the requirement of consolidating company B’s sales data into company A’s Snowflake account is to use cross-region data replication within Snowflake. This feature allows data providers to securely share data with data consumers across different regions and cloud platforms. By replicating the sales data from company B’s account in Azure West Europe region to company A’s account in AWS us-east-1 region, the data will be synchronized and available for consumption. To enable data replication, the accounts must be linked and replication must be enabled by a user with the ORGADMIN role. Then, a replication group must be created and the sales database must be added to the group. Finally, a direct share must be configured from company B’s account to company A’s account to grant access to the replicated data. This option is more efficient and secure than exporting and importing data using CSV files or migrating the entire Snowflake deployment to another region or cloud platform. It also does not require building a custom data pipeline using external tools.

References:

• Sharing data securely across regions and cloud platforms
• Introduction to replication and failover
• Replication considerations
• Replicating account objects